Is it possible that the clinical theory of relational psychoanalysis corresponds to ereignis, i.e. the event of appropriation, since they emphasize the primacy of (mutual) enactment, and believe that only via the enactments coming alive can we learn something that really matters ?
The above question can be reiterated for the intersubjective theory, in a milder way, however.
And the above question is, put in another way, "does relationship precede interpretation ?"