- x

Saturday, April 16, 2016

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEVVZGOXZYa2xucU0/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEWUctcG9LZHBsNW8/view?usp=sharing

now, 有趣的人和人生必意含某種成癮, 成癮一定有某種快樂但這種快樂夙乎即逝不可留駐遂欲尋回並重覆之因此讓我們再說一次成癮一定有某種快樂但這種快樂帶來的是更大的饑餓和渴望, 成癮帶來的遂絕非平靜要平靜的人請去讀法華經 (每個台灣偉人去勢時必讀的那本書), 成癮應有完成某種作品的意函比如說將全身滿滿刺青比如說千人斬比如說完成某個哲學系統的論述比如說收集不管收集什麼鬼名堂但作品一旦完成會讓人無法避而不見黑洞般的空虛所以這種作品最好是完成不了的那種作品比如說史鐵生筆下命若琴弦的那把二胡, 以上所述當然有深陷神經迴路的機轉在作祟但恰恰就在這深陷的輪迴中那個盲者坐在廢墟他說一切都還好, 所以成癮是存在的證據讓我們希望那會是有趣的證據 (aug 5, 2015 流浪貓的流水席)

Friday, April 15, 2016

Masaoka Shiki (正岡子規, 1867-1902)

石野雪峰 (b 1962, Yukimine Ishino)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rwgm__1L42Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGVfiITL7Po&list=RDrwgm__1L42Q&index=3

Phenomenology and Psychotherapy

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEcXdNcDNIcnN5X2M/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYENEtHb0lVaV9zTE0/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYET0UzZGgtdC05Y2M/view?usp=sharing

Ladislav Timulak

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYER0N4SGFXWko3dkU/view?usp=sharing

james joyce

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEMVJvN1R5MHVaT0k/view?usp=sharing

how to read Taiwan

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEX1pvWXA2LW9kTm8/view?usp=sharing

where are we, and how are we doing?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEQS10NTRpZ3N4ZXc/view?usp=sharing

how to read China

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEY0pqVXd2QXFxNW8/view?usp=sharing

買兇拍人 (You Shoot, I Shoot, 2001)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1G-0zP4nfwQ

kenneth gergen

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEN3FMN1F3YUgzdFU/view?usp=sharing

everyday life

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEOFlSZFJtZzBLbmM/view?usp=sharing

Harry Stack Sullivan

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEcWpib1VSZzlVaGM/view?usp=sharing

Karen Horney

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEQ2lJNEVhODItekU/view?usp=sharing

on failure

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEb0RHcnJ1eHk2TTA/view?usp=sharing

jon mills

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEYzlSSzRWMllTUWs/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEclVqMm41VGtwLWs/view?usp=sharing

Tomas Plänkers

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEYUFHeDVkbTQ1SVU/view?usp=sharing

Ludwig Binswanger

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5viXpvvYMYEOElEY3lndUxKb2M?usp=sharing

Arthur Schopenhauer

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEODI3MU1TdzhYSmc/view?usp=sharing

lacan

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYESmlMNUFwYjJ2Tkk/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEYTdKaW1qLU56TGs/view?usp=sharing

Cabernite-Lobo Affair

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEZ0Jyd1BmM1NLWWs/view?usp=sharing

Thursday, April 14, 2016

一個濫賭的傳說 (2001)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdk3DO4s84g

赵牧阳 (b 1967, 宁夏中卫)

老威（廖亦武）语：突然想起底層歌手趙牧阳，我的朋友，曾經在雲南麗江，祼體開演唱會。

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mybj0W4fuGw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVyBZWAJA0Y

grandola vila morena (april 25, 1974)

ândola, brown town

http://lyricstranslate.com/en/gr%C3%A2ndola-vila-morena-gr%C3%A2ndola-brown-town.html#ixzz45o6W6FbX

Grândola, brown town

Grândola1, brown town2

Land of fraternity

It's the people who lead

Inside you, oh city

It's the people who lead

Land of fraternity

Grândola, brown town

On each corner there's a friend

In each face there's equality

Grândola, swarthy town

Land of fraternity

Grândola, brown town

In each face there's equality

It is the people who lead

In the shadow of a holm oak

Which no longer knew its age

I swore as my companion,

Grândola, your will

I swore as my companion

In the shadow of a holm oak

Which no longer knew its age

1.Town in Alentejo, Southern Portugal.
2.Or tanned, swarthy town.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaLWqy4e7ls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha-h5bPSxQE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDEZyFsZGbo

輪迴

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvW8JEuIo58

在慢車上讀沙河彼岸的歌 (2008 冬)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEZ29ta1RhWkppLUU/view?usp=sharing

masochism

我先前說過這種人(wounded healers)的兩個罩門
• Narcissism
• Masochism

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEaDNWYnByS3ZBWFU/view?usp=sharing

walking with robert walser

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEbXFaQjFlX3JadUE/view?usp=sharing

Reading Donna Orange (winter, 2015)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYETEJZd3lPZDFDUjg/view?usp=sharing

這一切要從龍天樓說起

龍天樓後無樓

另一處在龍天樓最後一句自「整座樓沒進暗影中」改為「整個樓面落進暗影中」

若要整座樓都沒入暗影中除非還有一座更高的樓在牠的背後擋住

一旦修改過困擾了我十多年的問題就像治好了十多年的痼疾一樣頓然輕鬆許多

十五篇小說序頁三

王文興一九八零年八月十日

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYESERHTUNkeDZkX00/view?usp=sharing

遠方的鼓聲

遠方的鼓聲﹕走向批判(的)心理治療

Drums faraway: March toward critical psychotherapy

Dec 12, 2015

張凱理

心理治療誕生於廿世紀初葉，迄今已逾百年。治療者，在治療室裡，面對時勢造成的下游浮沉漂流失所的人；在時勢中，溫馴地(甚至過度溫馴地)配合時勢討生活；改變不了時勢，卻自稱擁有內在世界的鎖鑰，可讓人真實知己，俯首接受不公不義的現實，想開一點，好好活下去。自欺欺人，卻裝得一付很有精神的樣子，午夜夢迴的治療者，是應該驚出一身冷汗的。這個學門的歷史，明顯罕見批判的血淚。

遠方的鼓聲？你確定不是幻聽？

批判有三，批判的精神醫學，批判的心理學，批判的心理治療。前兩者之歷史，比較明確。後者，祇有零星的論述，我們還不知道，批判的心理治療的可能性是什麼？這個工作坊，旨於介紹這些遠方的鼓聲，和尋找那個可能性。

(1) Where are we? 以Layard Report (2006), Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT)為例

(2) What are we? 以Tod Sloan (1995), Zygmunt Bauman (2003, 2011), Frank Furedi (2003), Michael Foley (2010)為例

(3) Who are they? 以David Smail (2013), Paul Moloney (2013), Del Loewenthal (2015)為例

(4) A few thoughts: Remembering Guattari

Reference

1. Layard Report (2006) http://cep.lse.ac.uk/textonly/research/mentalhealth/DEPRESSION_REPORT_LAYARD2.pdf

2. Damaged Life: The Crisis of the Modern Psyche, by Tod Sloan, Routledge, 1995

3. Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts, by Zygmunt Bauman, Polity, 2003

4. Collateral Damage: Social Inequalities in a Global Age, by Zygmunt Bauman, Polity, 2011

5. Therapy Culture: Cultivating Vulnerability in an Uncertain Age, by Frank Furedi, Routledge, 2003

6. The Age of Absurdity: Why Modern Life Makes it Hard to be Happy, by Michael Foley, Simon & Schuster UK; Reprint edition, 2011

7. Power, Interest and Psychology, by David Smail, PCCS Books, 2013

8. The Therapy Industry: The Irresistible Rise of the Talking Cure, and Why It Doesn't Work, by Paul Moloney, Pluto Press, 2013

9. Critical Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis and Counselling: Implications for Practice, ed. by Del Loewenthal, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015

10.Guattari Reframed: Interpreting Key Thinkers for the Arts, by Paul Elliott, I. B. Tauris, 2012

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEQkRIdy1hNW1QdG8/view?usp=sharing (2015-12-12)

2016-4-24

https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/9533673A737146F69F421FB960984053Y (MP3 2015-12-12)

2016-4-24

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEaXJDSmJuUmM3ZHc/view?usp=sharing (2007)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEdWhicEpJRUlHbjA/view?usp=sharing (2014)

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEcmlqYzBIbjhKeFU/view?usp=sharing (2015-3-7)

https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/D2218420EC1D4090B2182D8BAABAA5E6Y (MP3 2015-3-7)

Wednesday, April 13, 2016

文革五十年後

May 3, 2016 (kindle)

history in the ashes

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEM1hKOE1WQjFvanc/view?usp=sharing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCYZkTvRab8

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=po-XHAQc0Mo

2016-5-14

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5Y4gSz_T5M

Exile

文學 = 流亡文學 ?

Does psychoanalysis belong to the exile literature?

Is self psychology exile literature?

literature in the ashes

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEd1lVbGJHUFFoOXc/view?usp=sharing

2016-4-29

流亡
是失根的疲倦

能撐多久要看那
空燒的悲傷
和憤怒有沒有柴火
持續添加

但再怎麼
不甘願熄滅
這畢竟是
離開土地的空燒
改變不了現況的空燒
等待到發狂的空燒

意思是說
它必為灰燼

無聲無息的灰燼
從來都不曾存在過的灰燼
一切都是徒然的灰燼

以上說明
流亡的結局是
無名氏的死亡
在某個陋巷

於是
我們終於知道

故舊天涯三杯酒的酒
是祭拜的雨水和淚水　

2016-4-30

https://www.asuswebstorage.com/navigate/s/453A2A672BA741E6961FA120BC1F436EY (MP3 2016-4-30)

Monday, April 11, 2016

以自體心理學為基調的心理治療，究竟殊勝何在？

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEaTRWZElvdVNhUW8/view?usp=sharing

以自體心理學為基調的心理治療

張凱理醫師

承蒙主編陳醫師邀稿，遂藉此機會回答我自己，一個困擾卅年的問題。

那就是，以自體心理學為基調的心理治療，究竟殊勝何在？

What difference does the self make for the theory and practice of counselling
and psychotherapy?

以下，我分幾點試申述之：
一、精神分析理論發展的內在邏輯
二、現象學的路意謂人的歸位
三、而人的歸位意涵回到人文學的傳統
四、並沒有打算低估治療室裡的風險
五、風塵僕僕我們遂終於來到湖邊

精神分析理論發展的內在邏輯

精神分析理論的發展，非線性邏輯，明顯源自理論者的執見，和隨之與此執見的對話。
過去百年，已有數折1，(1) 本我心理學 (2) 自我心理學 (3) 客體關係理論 (包括克萊茵學派、中間[獨立]學派、依附理論) (4) 自體心理學 (包括後寇哈特之互為主體理論、特異性理論) (5) 關係學派 (6) 拉崗學派 (7) 與神經科學的交涉 (包括神經精神分析、人際神經生物學)。

(1)至(5)，五個關鍵辭是 id， ego， object， self， relationality。

其中(1)與(2)為古典精神分析理論，(3)的關鍵在克萊茵一生不捨對黝暗的逼視，且在兩個女人(安娜和克萊茵)的戰爭中，逼出中間學派；依附理論則是Bowlby不願受限於治療室裡，因而發生的治療室外的旅程，曾被精神分析圈內忽視多年，近年復成典範；(4)的關鍵在二戰後美國精神分析(2)自我心理學獨大之局的令人窒息，自體心理學的對話者是(2)，非(3)客體關係理論，與(3)雖不謀而合，但亦同中有異；(5)的源頭在沙立文，開始復興是在(3)(4)諸前輩，1980前後凋零後，在客體關係理論和自體心理學的既有基礎上，執關係一辭而論述，這是現在的顯學。(6)與(2)(3)(4)(5)皆無關，其關鍵辭為語言，這是巴黎的風景。(7)則是近廿年，神經科學突飛猛進，精神分析被迫須與之對話匯合。

所以讀精神分析文獻，要讀出作者在與誰對話。對話自有其情緒和脈絡。
最可貴的還是執見，那是一切的開始。
我嘗說，理論者以己為獻祭，換來讓我們得以一窺黝暗的燭光。
但燭光不過燭光，所見有限，且倏忽即逝。
意思是說，有志氣者，要決心待在黝暗中良久2，甚至沒有打算活著離開。

現象學的路意謂人的歸位

自體 (self) 就是人的現象和經驗，作為一個概念，它往往被批評為，無可救藥的主觀 (hopelessly subjectivistic) 。
但講自體，就必定走現象學的路。

據我所知，寇哈特沒有直接提過現象學。但他講過 experience-near vs. experience-distant，也講過 understanding vs. explaining。後者豈不正是德國哲學的 verstehen vs. erklaren！

且他說，sustained empathic immersion是心理治療的入徑。進去那裡？當然是人的世界。這是所謂 the primacy of self-experience (self-state)。

海德格是這麼界定verstehen的：

“standing before, residing before, holding oneself at an equal height with what one finds before oneself, and being strong enough to abide it” (GA 15: 334-5, Four Seminars, 40-1)

寇哈特見海公此言，應會微笑致意。

心理學方面，十九世紀末William James論述之後，self一辭消失了半個世紀，直到六零年代，第三心理學(人本心理學)興起，才又出現。精神分析方面， James Strachey把der Ich譯為ego，self一辭遂也消失了半個世紀，直到寇哈特的自體心理學，才又出現。當然，英國客體關係理論諸君，會說他們在講客體關係時，早就在講self了，但除了Guntrip和Winnicott，他們並沒有直接用這個字3。

the self was explicitly absent (though perhaps assumed to exist) in classical psychoanalysis (Brinich & Shelley, 2002)4

順此我說：

the self was implicitly present (though perhaps not acknowledged) in object relations theories

如果人(的現象和經驗)是一個銅板，銅板的一面是客體關係，另一面就是自體的狀態。把這個銅板翻過來，讓我們能夠面對自體，就是寇哈特的貢獻5。人的歸位謂此。

卅年來，我祇有兩個命題。

第一個命題，在1990s初期形成，就是：「個別動力心理治療的兩大基石為客體關係理論和自體理論」。

而人的歸位意涵回到人文學的傳統

第二個命題，在2005左右確定，就是：「從人文學的傳統迴溯心理治療，這個迴溯將體現於現象-詮釋-存在 (P-H-E) (Phenomenological-Hermeneutical-Existential)6 觀點」。

對我而言，這正是心理治療存在的理由 (raison d’etre)，我嘗謂此，人文精神的憩息之所。
第二個命題不是來自寇哈特，雖然我很高興他的未竟之夢是想做個歷史學家7。
這個命題，來自我此生前卅年8。
意思是說，這個命題對於我，是回到生命的原鄉。

那個地方，精神分析還不應該進場。

並沒有打算低估治療室裡的風險

我說過，自體心理學和中間學派是精神上的好兄弟 (kindred spirits)。他們都不忍不看到外在的苦境，所以他們都可能把他們的治療室變成幼兒園9。
關鍵的片語是use of therapist’s self。關鍵的概念是selfobject，或治療者必將成為病人的selfobject。
我知道，莫大的風險，等在不清楚的界限彼端，但我還是要說，治療者最有趣的位置，不在別處，正在那個兩難的versus上10。

風塵僕僕我們遂終於來到湖邊

幾年前，我終於把下面這張圖畫好，你可以說，我花了卅年才畫好。

The Two Dimensions of Psychotherapy

我心目中，最好的治療11，是放牛吃草，或在六七零年代的台灣，坐慢車旅行12。
當然，我知道，我們現在，已經沒有牛，也沒有慢車。
2015年春，與輔大心理所的同學，一起走過十六彎13，道別前我說，我們終於來到湖邊 …

以自體心理學為基調的心理治療，殊勝究竟何在？
它讓一個人，最後來到湖邊。

註
1. A Brief History of Psychoanalysis
1. Id psychology
2. Ego Psychology
3. Object Relations Theories
. Kleinians (Melanie Klein, Wilfred Bion)
. Middle School (The Independent School) (D. W. Winnicott, W. R. D. Fairbairn,
Harry Guntrip, Michael Balint)
. Attachment Theory (John Bowlby, Mary Ainsworth, Mary Main)
4. Self Psychology (Heinz Kohut)
. Intersubjectivity Theory (Robert Stolorow, George Atwood, Donna Orange,
Bernard Brandchaft)
. Specificity Theory (Howard Bacal)
5. Relational Psychoanalysis (Stephen Mitchell, Lewis Aron)
6. Lacanians (Jacques Lacan)
7. Interface with neuroscience
. Neuropsychoanalysis (Mark Solms)
. Interpersonal Neurobiology (Allan Schore, Daniel Siegel)

2. 關於這個黝暗，2014年，我嘗說：

治療者的自殺
這是不能談的話題
因為太私己個人褻瀆不敬了
但治療者的存在狀態
由此極端之例
或可窺其黝暗
廿年前我說治療者祇能despair and futility
十年前我說治療者的罩門是masochism and narcissism
可見我從來都不知道
他的救贖何在
意思是說
我心目中的治療者
是治療室裡
距離毀滅更近的那個人
他無能帶來光線
他在黑暗中
跟另一個人說
你先走罷
我還要留在這裡
這裡是我的家
其實我一直在這裡
比你更早來到這裡
我不是來這裡
找到你
帶你離開這裡的
應該說
是你來這裡找到我
以致於
你才可能離開這裡
祇有更大的黑暗
才能引領另一個黑暗
照這個邏輯
Frieda和Nina是適得其所
我們不該驚訝難過
她們就像喜瑪拉雅山上
冰封的好兄弟
已經成為山的一部份

3. 有人會說，Guntrip是第一位自體心理學家。

4. Paul Brinich, Christopher Shelley (2002) The Self And Personality Structure, Open University Press

5. 銅板翻過來之後，每個人遂都可以用self這個字了，這叫做自體的心理學 (Psychology of the Self)，這不必受限於寇哈特的自體心理學 (Self Psychology)。

6. P-H-E：現象學的路 (Phenomenological way)，詮釋學的精神 (Hermeneutic spirit)，存有的關懷(Existential concern) 。

7. 寇哈特之子，償其父志。Thomas A. Kohut (2003). Psychoanalysis as Psychohistory or Why Psychotherapists Cannot Afford to Ignore Culture, Annual of Psychoanalysis, 31:225-236. A German Generation: An Experiential History of the Twentieth Century, by Thomas A. Kohut, Yale University Press, 2013

8. 1991年冬，與陳珠璋教授一起在紐約開會(AGPA)。晚席，對某君說，我花了廿年學了一堆東西，然後花了十年把它忘掉，卅歲後才開始學我真正要學的，這個老外聽了大笑。這是在童年到青春期，走過白色恐怖年代的人的宿命。但吊詭的是，早就消逝的童年的家，擺滿父母親和兄姐藏書的簡陋的家，卻是我後卅年一直要回去的地方。

9. 回到那個房間裡的風暴：關於治療關係的思索，第十二屆自體心理學研討會，師大教育心理與輔導學系王麗斐教授主辦 (Dec 21, 2013)

10. The Key Issues in Treating the Difficult Patients

•boundary vs. flexibility
•structure vs. relaxation
•abstinence vs. responsiveness
•passivity vs. activity
•anonymity vs. self-disclosure
•Transference-Countertransference matrix vs. real relationship
•words vs. actions
•how to survive the projective identification process

11. 好的治療，是我不知道你是怎麼好起來的；不好的治療，是我知道你為什麼不好的。

12. 有三篇作品宜隨手翻閱，在慢車的旅途，讀出聲來。慢車是那種，沒有冷氣的，打開窗可以抽煙的，每站都停的，因此，每站都可以下，而且下了，就可能不再上的，真的是很慢的車。一是七等生的沙河悲歌，一是舞鶴的餘生，一是王文興的龍天樓，雖然第三篇可能要用山西太原的腔音。(在慢車上讀來自沙河彼岸的歌, 2008冬)

13. 心理治療十六彎 (Psychotherapy: Sixteen Meanderings)，輔大心理所2015課程。

輔大心理所2017自體心理學講座

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5viXpvvYMYEWUVfQUNOeGhIMUE/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B5viXpvvYMYEWllKZmtUZjNIdk0?usp=sharing

2017自體心理學講座
104-12-5
105-3-23
張凱理造
(1) 緣起

於是我乃知道運甕者以為他在甕外
洗碗工則不可能不在碗內

Stirrings Still

起身離去之際
算是對過去卅年做一個終於交待

此前形諸文字始自2002 其中所述大致不差不須修改
2014秋朔風動秋草邊馬有歸心
初探溯源和比較研究諸題 2015春輔大課上
2015秋增Donna Orange 遂為後寇哈特發展(7)
2015秋對中國和台灣局勢尤其前者莫大興趣遂增 how to read China / self (psychology) and history 反之對於自身所在之後者反而無話可說這點殊為奇怪
2015秋增 masochism 乃至moral masochism 慨然除narcissism外 masochism果是自體的大問題
入冬增叔本華其denial of the will 豈不與masochism有關
乃至 2016春文革五十年後流亡 self-censorship

至此尚未處理 Roy Baumeister / Arnold Goldberg (2015) / Robert M. Galatzer-Levy (2016) / Frank Dikotter (2016) …

故舊天涯三杯酒遠地望鄉第一樓
是的遠地望鄉

離溝久矣已失十年前臨床凝視之泥濘在場感
且明確知道非臨床的凝視從來都缺社會學人類學文化研究哲學史學文學 (尤其小說) 之紮實支援

生不過浮蝣
於是我乃知道

此生終於畢竟無法交待

(2) 目次

1. Heinz Kohut: Life and Work (1)
2. Heinz Kohut: Life and Work (2)
3. Kindred Spirits I: Fairbairn
4. Kindred Spirits II: Guntrip
5. Kindred Spirits III: Balint
6. Kindred Spirits IV: Bolwby
7. Tracing Back I: Ferenczi
8. Tracing Back II: Otto Rank
9. Further Dialogue: Relational Psychoanalysis
10. Further Dialogue: Arthur Schopenhauer
11. New Development I: Intersubjectivity Theory
12. New Development II: Specificity Theory
13. New Development III: Psychoanalytic Complexity
14. New Development IV: Beatrice Beebe
15. New Development V: Bernard Brandchaft
16. New Development VI: Arnold Goldberg (2015)
17. New Development VII: Donna Orange (2015)
18. The Self And Personality Structure
19. Narcissism 30 years later
20. Self (psychology) and history
21. How to read China / 文革五十年後 / Exile / How to read Taiwan
22. Drums faraway: march toward critical psychotherapy
23. Coda: Self psychology-imbibed psychotherapy

(3) 參考

1. Ammaniti, M. and V. Gallese (2014). The Birth of Intersubjectivity: Psychodynamics, Neurobiology, and the Self, W. W. Norton & Company.
2. Atwood, G. E. (2011). The Abyss of Madness, Routledge.
3. Atwood, G.E. et al. (2014). Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology and Contextualism, 2 ed., Routledge.
4. Auchincloss, E. L. (2015). The Psychoanalytic Model of the Mind, APPI.
5. Auchincloss, E. L. et al. (ed) (2012). Psychoanalytic Terms and Concepts, 4th Revised edition, Yale University Press.
6. Auerbach, J. S., et al. (2016). Relatedness, Self-Definition and Mental Representation: Essays in honor of Sidney J. Blatt, Routledge.
7. Bacal, H. A. (1998). Optimal Responsiveness: How Therapists Heal Their Patients, Jason Aronson.
8. Bacal, H. A. et al. (2010). The Power of Specificity in Psychotherapy: When Therapy Works and When It Doesn't, Jason Aronson.
9. Beebe, B., et al. (2016). The Mother-Infant Interaction Picture Book: Origins of Attachment, W. W. Norton & Company.
10. Beebe, B., et al. (2005). Forms of Intersubjectivity in Infant Research and Adult Treatment, Other Press.
11. Beebe, B. and F. M. Lachmann (2002). Infant Research and Adult Treatment: Co-constructing Interactions, Routledge.
12. Beebe, B. and F. M. Lachmann (2013). The Origins of Attachment:
Infant Research and Adult Treatment, Routledge.
13. Blatt, S. J. (2008). Polarities of Experiences: Relatedness and Self-definition in Personality Development, Psychopathology and the Therapeutic Process, Amer Psychological Assn.
14. Brandchaft, B. et al. (2010). Toward an Emancipatory Psychoanalysis: Brandchaft's Intersubjective Vision, Routledge.
15. Brinich, P. and C. Shelley (2002). The Self And Personality Structure (Core Concepts in Therapy), Open University Press.
16. Coburn, W. J. (2013). Psychoanalytic Complexity: Clinical Attitudes for Therapeutic Change, Routledge.
17. Coren, A. (2009). Short-Term Psychotherapy: A Psychodynamic Approach, 2nd Edition, Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Detrick, D. et al. (ed) (1989). Self Psychology: Comparisons and Contrasts, Routledge.
19. Galatzer-Levy, R. M. (2016). From 40 Years of Chaos: Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics, Complexity Theory, and Psychoanalysis, Routledge.
20. Goldberg, A. (ed) (1978). The Psychology of the Self: A Casebook, International Universities Press.
21. Goldberg, A. (2015). The Brain, the Mind and the Self: A psychoanalytic road map, Routledge.
22. Goodman, D. M. and E. R. Severson (2016). The Ethical Turn: Otherness and Subjectivity in Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Routledge.
23. Grossmark, R. (2016). The Unobtrusive Relational Analyst: Working with hard-to-reach patients, Routledge.
24. Hirsch, I. (2014). The Interpersonal Tradition: The origins of psychoanalytic subjectivity, Routledge.
25. Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self: A Systematic Approach to the Psychoanalytic Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorders, International Universities Press.
26. Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self, International Universities Press.
27. Kohut, H., Paul Ornstein (ed) (1978). The Search for the Self, Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut 1950–1978, Vol. 1, International Universities Press.
28. Kohut, H., Paul Ornstein (ed) (1978). The Search for the Self, Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut 1950–1978, Vol. 2, International Universities Press.
29. Kohut, H., Arnold Goldberg with Paul E. Stepansky (ed) (1984). How Does Analysis Cure?, University of Chicago Press.
30. Kohut, H., Charles Strozier (ed) (1985). Self Psychology and the Humanities, W. W. Norton & Co.
31. Kohut, H., Miriam Elson (ed) (1987). The Kohut Seminars on Self Psychology and Psychotherapy With Adolescents and Young Adults, W. W. Norton & Co.
32. Kohut, H., Paul Ornstein (ed) (1990). The Search for the Self: Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut: 1978–1981. Vol. 3, International Universities Press.
33. Kohut, H., Paul Ornstein (ed) (1991). The Search for the Self: Selected Writings of Heinz Kohut: 1978–1981. Vol. 4, International Universities Press.
34. Kohut, H., Geoffrey Cocks (ed) (1994). The Curve of Life: Correspondence of Heinz Kohut, 1923–1981 University of Chicago Press.
35. Kohut, H., Paul Tolpin and Marian Tolpin (ed) (1996). The Chicago Institute Lectures, The Analytic Press.
36. Kohut, H., Philip F. D. Rubovits-Seitz (ed) (1999). Kohut’s Freudian Vision, The Analytic Press.
37. Krycka, K. C., et al. (2015). Psychotherapy for the Other: Levinas and the Face-to-Face Relationship, Duquesne University Press.
38. Newman, K. M. and H. A. Bacal (1989). Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology, Columbia University Press.
39. Orange, D. M. (2009). Thinking for Clinicians: Philosophical Resources for Contemporary Psychoanalysis and the Humanistic Psychotherapies, Routledge.
40. Orange, D. M. (2011). The Suffering Stranger: Hermeneutics for Everyday Clinical Practice, Routledge.
41. Orange, D. M. (2015). Nourishing the Inner Life of Clinicians and Humanitarians: The Ethical Turn in Psychoanalysis, Routledge.
42. Rachman, A. (2016). The Budapest School of Psychoanalysis: The Origin of a Two-Person Psychology and Emphatic Perspective, Routledge.
43. Ronald R. Lee, et al. (1991). Psychotherapy After Kohut: A Textbook of Self Psychology, Routledge.
44. Stolorow, R. D., et al. (2002). Worlds of Experience: Interweaving Philosophical And Clinical Dimensions In Psychoanalysis, Basic Books.
45. Stolorow, R. D., et al. (2011). World, Affectivity, Trauma: Heidegger and Post-Cartesian Psychoanalysis, Routledge.
46. Strozier, C. (2001). Heinz Kohut: The Making of a Psychoanalyst, Farrar Straus Giroux.
47. Tafarodi, R. W. (2015). Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century: Psychological, Sociological, and Political Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.
48. Wallis, K. C. (2001). Internalization (Core Concepts in Therapy), Open University Press.