Perversion
(1) clinical or social control？
(2) paternal function
(3) absent father, lost sons (Absent Fathers, Lost Sons: The Search for Masculine Identity, Guy Corneau, Shambhala, 1991)
(4) related to narcissism (Timeless Grandiosity and Eroticized Contempt: Technical Challenges Posed by Cases of Narcissism and Perversion, Michael Shoshani, Batya Shoshani, Phoenix Publishing House, 2020)
(5) what did Lacan say
(6) expressed via technology (The Age of Perversion: Desire and Technology in Psychoanalysis and Culture, Danielle Knafo, Rocco Lo Bosco, Routledge, 2016)
(7) is perversion "difference"？(Ontology and Perversion: Deleuze, Agamben, Lacan, Boštjan Nedoh, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2019)
你要理解，一般思考和書寫，是順著既有框架鋪陳，不逾矩，所以，看了第一段，你就知道最後一段，即使，偶有片斷，氾濫逾越，一閃而逝，畢竟沒有想到底，說到底，上述是正常書寫，所以不好看，為什麼正常書寫這麼常見，我想是因為，作者過度潤飾，稜角都磨平了，還有就是，囿於學術規格，「遂無法不正經了」，這時，你才知道，perversion，就是不打算用傳教士姿勢打炮的傳教士，意思是說，打炮，「遂變得有趣起來」，
