https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alenka_Zupan%C4%8Di%C4%8D
https://egs.edu/alenka-zupancic-disavowal-book-discussion/
What did Alenka Zupančič say about poststructuralism and schizoanalysis? (ChatGPT, 2025-4-4)
Alenka Zupančič, a prominent figure in the Ljubljana School of Psychoanalysis, has critically engaged with both poststructuralism and schizoanalysis, particularly in relation to Lacanian psychoanalysis.
On Poststructuralism:
Zupančič distinguishes Lacan’s approach from that of poststructuralists. In a lecture titled “The Big Difference Between Lacan and Poststructuralists,” she articulates that while poststructuralists often emphasize the endless play of language and the instability of meaning, Lacan focuses on the structural limits of language and the encounter with the Real—elements that resist symbolization. This perspective underscores a fundamental divergence: poststructuralism tends to highlight the fluidity of meaning, whereas Lacan emphasizes the points where meaning collapses, revealing the subject’s confrontation with the Real.
On Schizoanalysis:
Regarding schizoanalysis, developed by Deleuze and Guattari as an alternative to traditional psychoanalysis, Zupančič and her colleagues in the Ljubljana School have critically assessed its premises. They argue that schizoanalysis, while aiming to liberate desire from the constraints of the Oedipal framework, may overlook the structural role of lack and negativity that Lacanian psychoanalysis posits as central to subject formation. In this view, schizoanalysis’s emphasis on the productive and affirmative aspects of desire might neglect the constitutive gaps and impasses that define the human subject in Lacanian terms.
In summary, Zupančič positions Lacanian psychoanalysis as offering a more nuanced account of subjectivity than what is found in poststructuralist and schizoanalytic frameworks. Her work suggests that while these approaches provide valuable insights, they may not fully account for the structural limitations and encounters with the Real that are central to Lacan’s theory.
