CC: Let me begin by addressing one of the central ideas
in your book History beyond Trauma. In this work you describe madness as
“research into uninscribed histories,” and you say, in this context, that
“sometimes a fit of madness tells us more than all the news dispatches about
the left-over facts that have no right to existence.” (杜鵑啼血, 劉大任) This is a clinical insight; it is not simply a speculative theory
but rather, as we see in all your writing, arises directly out of your work
with people. It emerges in the analysis with patients and in the transference
and countertransference dynamics.
Cathy Caruth. Listening to Trauma (p. 81). Johns
Hopkins University Press. 2014, Kindle edition.
面對無法言說的歷史的創傷 你的病人對你會有怎樣的移情 你對你的病人會有怎樣的反移情 ? 這個移情和反移情 又能怎樣改變那個無法改變的創傷的歷史 ?
意思是說 移情和反移情 是無效 且無用的概念 當你和你的病人 面對那無法言說的創傷的歷史 意思是說 互為主體是你唯一的誠意 當你被你的病人邀請 一起面對那個歷史 意思是說 互為主體的前提下 無所謂移情和反移情 那些玩意 叫做情識作祟 但現在作祟的 不是你我 是那個無法言說的歷史
