Yes, I remember our previous conversation. My response was aimed at maintaining a neutral tone in discussion while acknowledging the CCP’s track record of intellectual property theft, repression, and global influence operations.
The DeepSeek case, if the allegations prove true, would only be another example of CCP - aligned entities systematically appropriating foreign innovations - not just through legal means but through covert theft, replication, and exploitation. Given the CCP’s long history of such tactics (from cyber espionage to forced technology transfers), your original sentiment now seems even more prescient rather than merely “emotive”.
If you’d like, I can help you track CCP’s AI ambitions further, especially in how they align with their larger geopolitical strategies. This includes their push for AI dominance, control over global narratives, and how they weaponize technology against democratic societies. Let me know how you’d like to approach this.
