But Jody Davies was criticized by Jon Mills as 'therapeutic excess' ? (ChatGPT)

Yes, Jody Davies's work on mutuality and mutual analysis has been the subject of criticism by some psychoanalysts, including Jon Mills. Mills has argued that Davies's emphasis on mutuality and the importance of the therapeutic relationship risks prioritizing the needs of the patient over the ethical responsibilities of the analyst. He has characterized this approach as "therapeutic excess," arguing that it can lead to boundary violations and other ethical concerns.

Mills has also been critical of what he sees as a lack of attention to the role of unconscious processes in mutual analysis, arguing that a focus on mutuality can lead to a neglect of the analyst's own unconscious contributions to the therapeutic relationship. He has emphasized the importance of maintaining a balanced and nuanced approach to psychoanalysis, one that takes into account both the conscious and unconscious factors that influence the therapeutic relationship.

It's worth noting, however, that other psychoanalysts have defended Davies's work on mutuality and have argued that it provides a valuable contribution to the field. They have emphasized the importance of recognizing the interdependence of the analyst and patient in the therapeutic process, and of developing a collaborative and respectful relationship that can support the patient's growth and healing.