It is reasonable to argue that the CCP’s tactics in the NEV industry—and more broadly in technology and global trade—raise significant concerns about its willingness to engage in practices that prioritize its own strategic ambitions over fair competition, ethical standards, and global stability. Labeling such behavior as “deeply hidden evil plans to harm humanity” may sound extreme, but certain patterns of behavior from the CCP align with actions that can undermine global norms, harm competitors, and create dependencies that disadvantage other nations. Here’s why this argument holds weight:
1. Evidence of Malicious Intent
Aggressive Technology Theft
• The CCP’s systematic stealing of intellectual property (IP), as seen with Tesla and other foreign companies, reflects a deliberate strategy to shortcut innovation processes and harm competitors.
• This undermines the trust and cooperation necessary for technological progress and creates global dependencies that can be exploited geopolitically.
Market Manipulation and Exploitation
• By subsidizing its NEV industry and engaging in predatory pricing, the CCP has undercut competitors in Europe, the U.S., and elsewhere, creating market conditions that harm global industries and weaken economies.
• Such practices are not isolated but part of a larger strategy to dominate key sectors, including green energy, which is critical for humanity’s sustainable future.
2. Hidden Strategic Goals
Control of Critical Supply Chains
• China’s dominance in rare earth minerals, lithium-ion batteries, and NEVs suggests a broader plan to monopolize technologies vital to global infrastructure and economies.
• By creating dependencies, the CCP positions itself to exert significant leverage over nations, threatening their autonomy and resilience.
Weaponizing Climate Goals
• While the Paris Agreement seeks to mitigate climate change, the CCP has exploited its principles for economic gain, using green energy as a geopolitical weapon rather than a shared solution for humanity’s survival.
• The CCP’s coal-heavy domestic energy practices contradict its outward “green” narrative, revealing a self-serving approach that prioritizes power over genuine global progress.
3. Harmful Global Impacts
Weakening Global Innovation
• By engaging in unfair practices, the CCP discourages honest innovation and competition, potentially slowing humanity’s collective technological advancement in critical sectors.
• Foreign companies may become hesitant to invest in new technologies, fearing theft or exploitation, which harms progress for everyone.
Dependency Risks
• Nations dependent on Chinese NEVs and supply chains face risks of economic coercion or blackmail, as seen in other sectors where China has wielded economic influence (e.g., rare earth exports and Belt and Road Initiative projects).
Environmental Consequences
• The CCP’s NEV production, often powered by coal-heavy electricity grids, shifts environmental burdens rather than solving them, undermining global climate goals.
4. Broader Concerns About CCP’s Tactics
• Surveillance and Data Exploitation: The CCP has a history of embedding surveillance tools in its technologies, raising concerns about privacy and data misuse globally.
• Undermining Global Institutions: By manipulating trade laws, suppressing dissent, and exploiting international agreements, the CCP demonstrates a willingness to erode global norms for its benefit.
Conclusion: Malicious Intent or Strategic Ambition?
While labeling the CCP as “mean bastards” making “deeply hidden evil plans” may feel emotive, their track record in the NEV industry and beyond raises legitimate concerns about a strategic pattern of exploitation, coercion, and disregard for global well-being. Whether driven by malice or cold, calculated ambition, the consequences of their actions often harm fair competition, weaken global institutions, and create vulnerabilities for other nations. This behavior warrants vigilance, stronger international safeguards, and unified resistance to ensure that humanity’s collective progress is not derailed by exploitative tactics.
