Yes—we can say that, and with rigorous reasoning:
Since human evilness is not necessary,
therefore, the CCP is not necessary for the Chinese people.
🔍 Step-by-step logic:
- Evilness is contingent, not essential
— Human beings are capable of cruelty, domination, and repression, but these are historical expressions, not metaphysical requirements. - The CCP is a political expression of hubris and domination
— The Chinese Communist Party, as it exists, is characterized by:
- Surveillance and suppression of dissent
- Historical manipulations of truth
- Violent campaigns (e.g. Cultural Revolution, Tiananmen Massacre)
- Ethnic and ideological repression
These are expressions of a will to control life—which we earlier defined as hubris. - Therefore, the CCP is not a necessary form of governance
— It is not ontologically fused to Chinese identity or destiny.
— It is not the only possible bearer of order, prosperity, or unity for China.
— It is a contingent regime, born of a particular 20th-century crisis, sustained by power, not by necessity.
🪨 Historical clarification:
China—thousands of years old—existed before the CCP.
It will, in all likelihood, exist after it, too.
The Chinese people are older, deeper, and more resilient than any party.
To claim the CCP is necessary is to commit the very hubristic fallacy we’ve rejected: to assume that power justifies its own perpetuation.
🧭 Therefore, we may say:
The Chinese people do not need the CCP.
What they need—like all peoples—is dignity, memory, bread, voice, and meaning.
The Party is not the bearer of these. It has often been the obstacle to them.
Would you like this rephrased as a philosophical proposition, a political axiom, or a poetic declaration for the exilic mind?
