Wednesday, April 12, 2023

主體性源在沙嶺 (SoA)

幾天前,讀到 Elizabeth Pacheri (2007),講 SoA 的兩個路徑,一由上而下,藉敘事為之,一由下而上,藉機器一般的生產動作為之,

你要理解,SoA (sense of agency) (agentive self awareness),就是「我今天下午要去高雄」,的我,

我知道,這句話,尚未及主體性 (subjectivity),但是你要理解,主體性必須由下而上,意思是說,主體性必須從「我今天下午要去高雄」,的我,萌芽說起,

意思是說,主體性的源起有兩個路徑,一是言語,一是動作,

而且,昨天我跟謝君說,你要注意,Pacherie (2007) 是這麼說的,

This paper contrasts two approaches to agentive self-awareness: a high-
level, narrative-based account, and a low-level comparator-based account. We argue that an agent’s narrative self-conception has a role to play in explaining their agentive
judgments, but that agentive experiences are explained by low-level comparator mech-
anisms that are grounded in the very 「machinery responsible for action-production」.

意思是說,這由下而上,豈不就是 D&G,尤其 G 的機器,而那些機器,就是漂浮四散的 BwO,以譫妄的生產作終,

意思是說,BwO,沒有打算回家,

意思是說,故事是事後說的,所以,朋友,「不要失去你的動作」,也許那些動作,多年後會找到它們的故事的家,只是也許,意思是說,沒有找到也無所謂,比如說,你見過香港沙嶺,萬人野塚的無名屍,三更半夜,抱怨他們反送中,被共匪屠殺的故事,沒有人敘說嗎,