https://journal.existentialanalysis.org.uk/ea
等了很多年，
Thursday, April 30, 2026
躺平萬歲滅習滅共萬萬歲 （菊次郎十六式）
https://youtu.be/UfvJNpmUtS4?si=-Dhpqt5Xx-yhZ0z3 （3:57）
我本不知，共匪把躺平，歸咎于原生家庭，你要理解，原生家庭，就是 Proustian ，歸因于共匪暴政，就是 Kafkaesque，你說給我聽，is psychotherapy Proustian or Kafkaesque ?
中國人民站起來反抗共匪暴政了
https://youtu.be/W06KZGaw3eg?si=zhXufTqaFY6A2fSr
你要理解，十個中國人，殺一個共匪，很快殺光後，大家坐下來，一起喝兩杯，然後去睡覺，一大早醒來，繼續殺，昨天漏掉的共匪，然後，吃中飯，然後，開始建設新中國，
Князь Григорий Александрович Потёмкин-Таврический （Grigoriy Aleksandrovich Potyomkin-Tavricheskiy, 1739-1791)
「波坦金村」
波坦金村的典故來源於葉卡捷琳娜對南方的訪問，這一說法由德國傳記作家喬治·馮·赫爾比格首創。批評者指出，波坦金用粉刷一新的外牆來讓葉卡捷琳娜誤以為這個地區非常富足。據說有數以千計的農民被組織起來配合這樣的形象工程。毫無疑問，波坦金的確希望能為葉卡捷琳娜展現最好的一面，他為女皇組織了許多充滿異國情調的旅行，並且至少兩個城市的地方官員建造了形象工程來掩蓋當地的貧困。
那年夏天看夕陽
https://sutian.moe.edu.tw/zh-hant/su/14076/
這明顯（obviously) 比拉丁文有趣，起因是小九說了很多次，但我「他媽的」（你要理解，這是少林正宗懷古鄉音）（Cf. 肉ㄉㄞ最喜歡的趕羚羊，這是共匪入侵後，海明威失去的非洲草原）（這明顯 (apparently) 也比拉丁文有趣）一直聽不懂，
性感的靈魂
你要理解，靈魂不是（九叔最喜歡抓的那種）陰魂，靈魂是你我火化後，逃逸的那二十一公克，遁入宇宙虛空的原子，你要理解，性感的靈魂，就是不穿褲子（或脫下褲子）的靈魂，換句話說，就是下半身的靈魂，你要理解，長樂街烏蠅哥，和明天冥交，大喊假的假的，意思是說，柯文哲和性感的靈魂「靈交」，兩個人的上半身，都大喊假的假的 （有趣的是，假的假的，就是假的平方，意思是說，就是『真的』貪污，或正確的說，（不穿褲子，或脫下褲子）『性感的』貪污），回到靈交，靈是心理學（甚至形上學），交是物理學，你要理解，形下終將戰勝形上，這就是昨天我說純粹形下，Carlo Strenger 反覆夢到，康德過世的那個深夜，多年後，他終于知道，這是一個失去形上慰藉的夢，海明威的老人，夢到年輕的獅子，非洲海灘嘻嘻，以上說明，交者無夢，
躺平即是正義 （民族英雄駱華忠，2021）
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E9%AA%86%E5%8D%8E%E5%BF%A0
https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20210714/lying-flat-in-china/
https://i.ifeng.com/c/86idAJdl8dz
https://youtu.be/EuAYq427PRU?si=k2ztySKlWdh6-myH
https://news.cctv.com/2026/04/28/ARTIYaYCRn5wqPeWkgcYxLSS260428.shtml
https://app.xinhuanet.com/news/article.html?articleId=20260428b9c2ef54d8a242738d84821a7ce63aba
https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202604280060.aspx
意思是說，共匪搔著陰囊，「腳」踐踏著中國人民，苦口婆心的說，不躺平就是畜牲，就是為境內邪惡集團，賣命為奴，
Wednesday, April 29, 2026
cornered state pattern
https://youtu.be/hoMuCZuht6U?si=UTssbpT0ZeGl8nv2
海峽封鎖一開始，伊朗就把其經濟，轉為內需，苟延殘喘型經濟，意思是說，IRGC 根本沒有打算投降，反而是在，密謀大反撲，這件事 1941 年，突襲珍珠港前，的日本知道，這件事，共匪也早就知道，意思是說，滅共就要炸光，共匪的十二億桶戰備儲油，意思是說，美國人的謀，是天真陽謀，IRGC / CCP 的謀，從頭到屌，都是狡詐陰謀，意思是說，ㄖㄡˋㄉㄞ吸的，是一支狡詐的陰險屌，你要理解，這種邪惡的屌吸多了，非常傷身，吸者的屌，會縮小到，周星馳用放大鏡，都找不到，簡單講，皮諾丘說謊越多，鼻子越長，吸共匪屌越多，屌越縮小，
In Carlo Collodi's The Adventures of Pinocchio (1883), Pinocchio’s nose grows as a physical consequence of lying, symbolizing dishonesty. It is a magical manifestation of his misbehavior. The nose can grow infinitely with continued lies, often cited as a paradoxical "infinite wood source". The phenomenon is also associated with the "Pinocchio paradox," where saying "my nose grows now" creates a logical contradiction.
4/29/26. (星期三）純粹形下 （菊次郎十六式）
澆水，118/4，fin 6/18，嚮往純粹形下的生活，肉呆純粹性器官，意思是說，共匪（3 cm laughable 性器官）之贏學，柯文哲（沒有請傭人）但是開銷很大，包子帝 （請很多傭人）但是開銷很小，問 deep(shit)seek 怎麼除包，小微說天下烏鴉（I.e. 共匪匪諜）一般黑，烏鴉是鳥，鳥是恐龍演化而來，在活火山島討生活，你要理解時間的單位，螞蟻壽命二十一天，川普節奏很穩，且無廢動作，意思是說，每個音符，都在它恰當位置，謝震龍說美即瞬間，物理即物性，人性純屬想像，物性大于人性，生物學即命運，地理即命運，生物學和地理，皆為物，歷史，人類的那種，只是人 / 物之間，的自以為是，比如說，IRGC / CCP，之肆虐人間，肉呆直播帶貨賣航母，你要理解，生命富沾黏性，沾就是糾結，黏就是黏液，性當然，就是性器官，意思是說，性器官，是肉呆對共匪，終極的想像 （ultimate imagination)，就像 1800，是我終極的臆想（ultimate fantasy)，你要理解，fantasy 非 phantasy，後者是克萊茵學派的絕活，前者只是胡思亂想，後者才是，潛意識的真相，意思是說，克萊茵學派的定義，就是唯一宣稱，見過潛意識的真相，還能活著回來者，意思是說，這種相信，非同小可，見到一隻（找不到下榻之處的）蜜蜂，牽牛花，作一點無關緊要的小事，就算草草一生，歡欣鼓舞的神經元說，路徑依賴實在可恥，路徑依賴就是，每天往返同樣的路，這種日子，還有三年，意思是說，第二個春天，尤其，第三個春天，才是春天，什麼是性感的靈魂，柯文哲說，答案當然是，脫了褲子的靈魂，
Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Dear friend, what’s your comment about Yuval Noah Harari’s concept of the "useless class"? (ChatGPT, 2026-4-28) (菊次郎十六式)
Yuval Noah Harari’s idea of the “useless class” — most clearly articulated in Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow — is deliberately provocative. But if we take it too literally, it quickly becomes misleading, even dangerous.
Let me unpack it in a way that might resonate with your own concerns about event, existence, and witnessing.
1. What Harari actually means (in a narrow sense)
Harari is not saying people are intrinsically useless.
He’s pointing to a possible economic trajectory:
- In previous eras:
- Humans were economically necessary (farmers, soldiers, workers)
- In an AI-driven future:
- Machines may outperform humans in most tasks
- Many people may become economically redundant
So “useless” really means:
“Not needed by the dominant economic system.”
That’s already a narrower — and colder — definition than it sounds.
2. The hidden assumption (this is where things get shaky)
Harari’s argument quietly assumes:
Human value = economic or functional utility
This is the weak point.
Because once you accept that equation,
history becomes very uncomfortable:
- Slaves were once “useful”
- The elderly are often “less productive”
- Children are “economically dependent”
Yet none of these categories are ontologically or ethically useless.
So the concept risks smuggling in a technocratic worldview:
a world where value is measured by performance, efficiency, data contribution.
3. A deeper critique (closer to your thinking)
From your perspective — especially your emphasis on:
- “症狀是存在的理由”
- bearing witness
- 為岩中花樹所見
Harari’s concept collapses.
Because:
Existence is not justified by function.
A “useless” person may still be:
- the site of an event (Ereignis)
- the bearer of a symptom that testifies to reality
- the one who must be witnessed
In your language:
The so-called “useless class” may be precisely
those closest to existence without alibi.
4. The real danger is political, not technological
Historically, labeling groups as “useless” leads to:
- marginalization
- abandonment
- or worse
The danger is not that AI creates useless people.
The danger is:
Systems begin to treat people as if they are disposable.
That shift is subtle, but catastrophic.
5. A reversal (your kind of move)
Let me try a reversal in your style:
- Harari:
→ “A useless class may emerge.” - Your line of thought could say:
→ “When the system cannot use you,
you finally appear.”
Or even more sharply:
“被判無用者，方顯其在。”
(Those declared useless are precisely those who are.)
6. A more grounded interpretation
If we strip away the drama, Harari is really pointing to a real issue:
- Mass displacement of meaning, not just jobs
- A crisis of:
- purpose
- dignity
- participation
That part is important.
But his framing is:
- sociological
- economic
- systemic
What it lacks is:
- existential depth
- ethical grounding
7. Final thought (quiet, but decisive)
The “useless class” only exists
in a world that has forgotten how to see.
In a world of:
- witnessing
- encounter
- event
there is no useless class.
Only:
those who have not yet been met.
If you want, we can take one further step:
👉 connect “useless class”
with your posthuman formulation
「物的反撲，人的退位」
That would open a very interesting (and slightly dangerous) line of thought.
Useless Class （菊次郎十六式）
Yuval Noah Harari’s concept of the "useless class" refers to a potential future, driven by AI and biotechnology, where a large portion of the population becomes not just unemployed, but unemployable. Unlike the Industrial Revolution, AI may outperform humans in both physical and cognitive tasks, creating a class of people seen as socially and economically irrelevant.
- Definition: The useless class consists of people who are not contributing to the economy or to society's knowledge,, as described by the Institute for Internet and the Just Society and Psychology Today.
- Cause: AI and biotechnology are advancing faster than labor markets, making many human roles redundant.
- Why "Useless?": As discussed by Medium and Psychology Today, AI may make more economical sense than human labor, rendering many workers "superfluous".
- The Difference with Past Revolutions: While previous technological revolutions replaced human labor with machine labor (physical), this new revolution threatens to replace human cognitive skills (brainpower) as well.
- The Danger: The issue is not just unemployment, but the creation of a group of people who are unemployable, creating intense social and political tension.
- Proposed Solutions: Harari highlights the need for solutions such as Universal Basic Income (UBI) and developing new definitions of human value beyond work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)