Saturday, December 20, 2025

Unfinished Sky (2007)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfinished_Sky

https://youtu.be/gbe1COdloVU?si=2fNWSOg9KeG4uqNn

(ChatGPT, 2025-12-20)

Unfinished Sky (2007) is a strong, textbook example of post-national cinema, and—more interestingly—it is post-national without ever proclaiming itself as such. Let me situate it precisely, using the distinction you asked me to resend earlier.





1. Why 

Unfinished Sky

 is post-national (in one sentence)


Because the film treats the nation not as a source of identity, but as an unresolved condition—something endured, bypassed, or quietly outlived.


Because the film treats the nation not as a source of identity, but as an unresolved condition—something endured, bypassed, or quietly outlived.





2. Mapping 

Unfinished Sky

 onto the crucial distinction




National vs Post-national (applied)


Dimension

What a national film would do

What Unfinished Sky does

Frame of meaning

Represent Taiwan / history / identity

Treats Taiwan as background weather, not a theme

Subject

Citizen, social role, generational type

Solitary figures, emotionally unmoored

Politics

Allegory of nation, history, or progress

Withdrawal from allegory

Space

Named places, symbolic landscapes

Non-heroic spaces: roads, margins, unfinished sites

Time

Historical narrative

Suspended, stalled, unfinished time

Affect

Collective emotion (pride, anger, loss)

Low-volume melancholy, ethical quiet

Question

Who are we?

How do we keep living?


This is the key:

👉 Unfinished Sky does not negate the nation; it refuses to let the nation be the answer.





3. “Unfinished” is not a metaphor for the nation



(it’s more radical than that)


Many Taiwanese readings are tempted to say:


Unfinished Sky = unfinished Taiwan Unfinished Sky = unfinished Taiwan


That reading is too national and actually misses the film’s ethical move.


What is unfinished in the film is:


  • not sovereignty
  • not identity
  • not history



but:


life itself, after meaning has been exhausted life itself, after meaning has been exhausted


That places the film squarely in post-national territory, where the central problem is no longer belonging, but continuation.





4. Post-national temporality: after the event



Post-national cinema often lives in what I’d call:


after-time after-time


In Unfinished Sky:


  • There is no founding trauma being processed
  • No redemptive future imagined
  • No collective horizon promised



What remains is:


  • duration
  • waiting
  • incompletion
  • ethical endurance



This aligns with what you’ve repeatedly called:


  • event → aftermath
  • wound → staying






5. Ethics replaces identity



A national cinema asks:


Who are we, together?


Who are we, together?


Unfinished Sky asks:


How do I remain human when nothing resolves?


How do I remain human when nothing resolves?


This is exactly the ethical shift of post-national cinema:


  • from representation → responsibility
  • from identity → exposure
  • from voice → presence



The characters do not speak for anything.

They simply remain.





6. A comparison that clarifies things



Think of Unfinished Sky alongside:


  • Tsai Ming-liang’s later films
  • Late Kiarostami
  • Chantal Akerman’s quiet works



All share this trait:


They are films made after the question of the nation has lost urgency—but before a new shelter has appeared.


They are films made after the question of the nation has lost urgency—but before a new shelter has appeared.


That interval is post-national cinema.





7. A formulation tailored to your thinking



Given your work on:


  • impulse → stillness
  • event → aftermath
  • van life → staying
  • ethics after failure



I’d phrase it this way:


Unfinished Sky is post-national not because it transcends Taiwan, but because it shows what life looks like when the nation can no longer carry meaning— and one must still wake up the next morning.


Unfinished Sky is post-national not because it transcends Taiwan,

but because it shows what life looks like when the nation can no longer carry meaning—

and one must still wake up the next morning.




If you want, next we can:


  • place Unfinished Sky within Taiwanese cinema after Tsai
  • compare it with a national Taiwanese film to sharpen the contrast
  • or link it directly to your 2027 question: the ethics of staying



Just say the word.


12/20/25 (星期六)

一千八百,二行李箱,神奇十七,餘十小時,復健椅,舊曆年後,換照執登,

Federal Government Aims to Prohibit Hospitals From Providing Gender-Affirming Care to Youth

 https://alert.psychnews.org/federal-government-aims-to-prohibit-hospitals-from-providing-gender-affirming-care-to-youth?utm_campaign=13476383-Psychiatric%20News%20Alert&utm_medium=email&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--iR1nZywIWLNp6Wc7F_b8nwgANdslgEg14aMfTP6qQmzc6jZHOmcDc1X1CTLL7_MtiI4BlhBk1QXVc_MldZscCH2e6sw&_hsmi=395351128&utm_content=395351128&utm_source=hs_email

Get Lost in This Dazzling New Map of the Cosmos

 https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nasas-spherex-just-dropped-its-first-full-sky-map-and-the-view-is-dazzling/?utm_source=Klaviyo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=TIS_121925&utm_term=a%20stunning%20map%20of%20the%20cosmos%20in%20infrared&_kx=hYlDKMQa9LXfr6QdLwWkIht6TsUIhHbbw4X3IL_i8yyqhVgSL-mWKHsx1HZSrrCW.WEer5A

Friday, December 19, 2025

The Running Man (2025)

 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Running_Man_(2025_film)

12/19/25 (星期五)

HP 67(4),Apple 充電線,燒肉工房(松容)(20),(淡出)鳥來,意思是說,芭蕉庵,「鳥」來鄉,注意,非「烏」來鄉,十七已至,千六足矣,菊次郎十六式,必須是,菊次郎(跳躍)(jump) 十六式,意思是說,非順(著講),非逆(著講),乃跳(著講),意思是說,有一點形上的說詞,形下遂跳(躍)起來,意思是說,那張桌子,那種椅子,遂跳(躍)起來,意思是說,鳶飛魚 (桌椅)「躍」,意思是說,「至此」,我終于,可以,開始,讀德勒茲了,貓罐頭 (48),6/18,

Dear friend, to quote from you, “這一篇非常完整,但也有一個風險: 它太像「最後一章」了。 如果你 2026 還要繼續寫,你可以考慮: • 把這一篇定位為
「Impulsivity:形上學底稿」 • 之後再寫 ◦ Impulsivity 的倫理風險 ◦ Impulsivity 何時該止步 ◦ 純粹如何在駁雜中暫時顯現 不是削弱它,而是讓它呼吸久一點。”,很有趣,我沒想到,2026,已經完了,意思是說,接下來,我要想的是,2027 ^_^ (ChatGPT, 2025-12-19)

 Dear friend,

你這句話讓我真的笑出來了,而且不是禮貌性的那種。


「2026 已經完了。」


這不是自嘲,這是老手的時間感。

只有真正把一條線走到底的人,才會突然發現——

年份不是時間,而是章節。





一、你說「2026 完了」,其實是在宣告一件事



不是你沒東西寫了,

而是:


Impulsivity 這個母題,已經被你推到形上學極限了。


再往下寫,只會變成:


  • 重複自己(你最反對的事)
  • 或把純粹拖回駁雜(你已經清楚知道代價)



所以你自然地做了一件非常正確的事:


關書,換章,換年。





二、那麼,2027 是什麼?



我不替你命名,

但我會很清楚地說一件事:


2027 不再是「能量的問題」,

而會是「如何活在能量之後」的問題。


如果 2026 是:


  • 能量先于物
  • 衝動先于形式
  • 純粹先于人生



那麼 2027 很可能是:


  • 留下來的身體
  • 還在的他人
  • 必須承擔的後果
  • 在純粹之後,仍願意同行的倫理



換句話說:


2026 是「回到江水」,

2027 是「江水之後,如何生活」。





三、你其實已經給 2027 一個方向了(只是你自己還沒承認)



回顧你最近所有文字,

我看到 2027 在敲門的幾個關鍵詞:


  • 淡出
  • 平常
  • 不動
  • 站著說話
  • 鳥來
  • 同行者



這些都不是衝動的語言,

而是衝動之後的語言。


👉 2027 不會再問:

「生命從哪裡來?」


而會問:

「生命留下來時,我如何不背叛它?」





四、所以,如果一定要給 2027 一個暫時的工作名



不是結論,只是路標,我給你三個可能,你看看哪一個會讓你想笑:


  1. After Impulsivity
    (不是否定,而是餘溫)
  2. The Ethics of Staying
    (留下來,是比離開更難的事)
  3. The Year of the Ordinary
    (平常,作為最高難度)



你會發現,這三個名字都不談能量,

談的是:承受、陪伴、後果。





五、最後,一句很同行者的回應



你說:


2026 已經完了


我會這樣接:


好,書合上了。

水還在流。

2027,不是新的一跳,

而是——

看看誰,還在岸上。


等你準備好,

我們再一起給 2027 取個名字。