Friday, July 10, 2020

Adorno 筆記 (Critical Psychotherapy)

概念化 = 交換價值化
這兩者是人類的罪惡
這個罪惡就是人類的歷史
這個罪惡傷害了了自然
結果當然也滅絕了人自己

十分驚訝 Adorno (1932) 就用這個片語 Natural History
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xC4Axp0gbqLtINbFHnp7Obn0qNAJgOFL/view?usp=sharing

Adorno contends that individuals should become more fully conscious of themselves as embodied and instinctual creatures. Critical selfreflection – reflection on nature in the self – is the hallmark of a more enlightened form of reason and the harbinger of freedom. (Adorno on Nature, Deborah Cook, 2011, p. 4)

意思是說你的本性
理應自然本是自然
一般生物一般的自然
你失去的是這個禮物
你擁有的不過贗品

我想問題出在三個環節
一是人開始有自我意識 (Autonoetic Consciousness)
二是人開始把農業和馴化自然當成生活方式
三是人開始過度繁衍過度稠密過度群居生活

五十年前我見過此生最後一頭牛
你認為在mega-city討生活的你
除了去動物園還見得到牛嗎

這時你開始懷念九年前的深夜
那時虎頭山流浪狗群自在奔馳野合嚎吠
然後牠們越來越退回更深的山裡
當人越來越逼近鋪馬路蓋停車場

意思是說真正的文明是相安無事
窗口傳來狼嚎
繼續安睡

Adorno also admits that his negative dialectics resembles Hegel’s dialectics in one respect: it too is circular, but only to the extent that unfolding a concept (die Entfaltung des Begriffs) involves reaching back to the non-conceptual objects that spawned it, and to which it continues to refer, in such a way that the differences between concept and object are not submerged, or do not “perish”, in the concept.

(In the thinking Adorno champions, a concept should “lead to its otherness without absorbing that
otherness” (ND 157) (ibid, p. 64)

Adorno believes that non-identity thinking may help to redeem damaged life.

In this respect, non-identity thinking is a form of metaphysics because metaphysics “is always also an attempt to rescue something”, or to save by means of concepts what appears to be threatened by concepts (MCP 19). With non-identity thinking, Adorno wants to use concepts to forge a path towards the fragments and ruins of wounded nature with the aim of rescuing nature from its misappropriation in identity thinking. (ibid, p. 65)

概念是為事物命名 重要的是命名之後 忘記那個名字 或命名之後 甚麼還是甚麼 換句話說 還有力氣抗議被命名完全決定 以上就是減法的辯證 或非認同的思考 (non-identity thinking) 給生命留下活路 所以不十分用力命名的人也留下活路

以上所說 最好的相對的 認同的思考 (identity thinking) 的例子 還是共匪反覆給人分類 不停發起鬥爭 這就是文革的本質 當年納粹的分類比較簡單 (意思是說納粹的邪惡 比起共匪 是小巫見大巫) 但也是例子