Sunday, December 20, 2020

mainly deleuze (critical psychotherapy)

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1EfJ9t9_8_WLHW48OkUQQevFMdeJhrYdB?usp=sharing

Chap 12 The Deleuzian Project, by Chris Oakley, in Critical Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis and Counselling: Implications for Practice ed. by Del Loewenthal, Palgrave Macmillan, 2015

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/post-clinical/201512/deleuze-and-stupid-psychology

https://www.amazon.com/Deleuze-Psychology-Philosophical-Provocations-Psychological-ebook/dp/B01JSIQG8E

https://www.amazon.com/Therapy-Counter-tradition-Philosophy-Manu-Bazzano-ebook/dp/B01DPGMOGI/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=therapy+and+counter+tradition&qid=1608519528&s=books&sr=1-1 (ordered, google play, not sure when)

幾點說明第一德勒茲不曾離開法國所以他是很貞潔的法國貨第二他是拒絕被肺部病魔折磨跳樓自殺的這點很誠實第三他與Guattari結緣二十多年這件事很有趣第四他對待哲學史(乃至歷史)的態度是健康的ass-fuck這點值得衛道人士比如說中共黨史學家模仿第五他明顯喜歡文學這點我中意第六他與心理衛生行業無關(除了透過Guattari那段和essays: critical and clinical, 1993)所以沒有Psy business的包袱而這個包袱是我迫切想擺脫的第七他擅長找到主流結構的裂縫然後引爆或take a pee第八他喜歡和被遺忘的小傳統為伍第九基本上老法在1968前後多昏了頭宣稱自己是毛主義者我沒有讀到德勒茲做過這種無法原諒的混帳事(Guattari明顯做過)第十讀德勒茲的策略比照讀海公從key concepts切入其oeuvre第十一似乎Guattari沒有key concepts一書可見老G不是以概念取勝