https://readingoutpost.com/zettelkasten-6-steps/
https://zettelkasten.de/overview/
https://theinformed.life/2023/09/10/episode-122-soenke-ahrens/
但是，最重要的，不是 （收集囤積以為擁有）資料的碎片，而是（點起紙菸微哂看著）思考的碎片，
關鍵是，將記憶外包，以致思考得以，輕裝旅行，
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklas_Luhmann
Luhmann was famous for his extensive use of the "slip box" or Zettelkasten note-taking method. He built up a zettelkasten of some 90,000 index cards for his research, and credited it with making his extraordinarily prolific writing possible. It was digitized and made available online in 2019.[27] Luhmann described the zettelkasten as part of his research into systems theory in the essay Kommunikation mit Zettelkästen.[28]
冷，12/16 再處理，ppt / 報備支援，二元之前，當然就是一元，二元之後，當然就是三元；由二返一，讓我們重返存有的 （being) 一元，由三返一，讓我們得以重返生成的 （becoming) 一元；一般心理治療，在一二之間 （transference) 操作，批判的心理治療 (schizoanalysis 亦然），在一三之間 (transversality) 操作；前者讓你以為回到家，後者讓你點起紙菸看著遠方四海為家；意思是說，前者讓你甘于 （自圓其說）不自由，後者讓你勇于（無法自圓其說）自由；意思是說，見三者 （讓三穿透自己者），方重得碎片的自己，和宇宙塵埃的自由 （零的定義，就是一還沒有，第一次發生之前）（意思是說，生成中的，碎片的自己，就是零）；
https://alert.psychnews.org/2024/12/new-guideline-advises-metformin-to.html
Metformin for the Prevention of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: Guideline Development and Consensus Validation
https://search.books.com.tw/search/query/key/%E6%96%BD%E5%B1%95/adv_author/1/
既然這是所謂偽中國歷史學家，我希望他能對習皇帝的「翹翹的」偽屁股，說點道地的偽見解，
https://theexaminedlife.org/library/the-myth-of-sisyphus
https://philosophybreak.com/articles/absurdity-with-camus/
Rising, tram, four hours in the office or factory, meal, tram, four hours of work, meal, sleep, and Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, according to the same rhythm—this path is easily followed most of the time.
https://youtu.be/KMYLAZP6jxA?si=nm4Xe28H2A-trQFM
https://youtu.be/S-UjeOU7wjo?si=pCjTB901lPhwrFFh
https://youtu.be/d7m-zT7Vp4c?si=ZYmhzFqBUu7hpET3
https://youtu.be/i3N8bp1lW5U?si=yxWt9JqvfJqO9kte
舉世聞名的反共鬥士韓國瑜傅崐萁，和小屁孩史東妓說，包子是最爽的裸官，裸就是「沒有穿褲子」光著屁股的意思，蘇小和說，其他數百「偶爾有穿褲子」的趙家人加起來總共「才」貪污五百六十萬億美金，就足以給十四億「沒有褲子穿」以致不得已光著屁股的中國人免費醫療教育安家養老五百六十年，意思是說，包子貪污所得可以養中國人八千年，
Second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-induced weight gain is a significant side effect of these medications, which are commonly used to treat psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression. The causative factors and potential treatments are outlined below:
Causative Factors of SGA-Induced Weight Gain
1. Neurochemical Mechanisms:
• Serotonin (5-HT2C) receptor antagonism: Many SGAs block the 5-HT2C receptor, reducing satiety signals and increasing appetite.
• Histamine (H1) receptor antagonism: This can lead to increased appetite and sedation, contributing to reduced physical activity.
• Dopamine (D2) receptor antagonism: Altered dopamine signaling in the hypothalamus may disrupt energy regulation and food reward systems.
2. Endocrine and Metabolic Effects:
• Insulin resistance: SGAs can impair glucose metabolism, leading to hyperinsulinemia and weight gain.
• Leptin resistance: Disruption in leptin signaling can impair appetite regulation.
• Dyslipidemia: SGAs can lead to altered lipid metabolism.
3. Lifestyle Factors:
• Reduced physical activity due to sedation.
• Increased caloric intake due to cravings and appetite stimulation.
• Socioeconomic and environmental factors limiting access to healthy food or exercise opportunities.
4. Genetic Susceptibility:
• Certain genetic polymorphisms (e.g., in the HTR2C or MC4R genes) may predispose individuals to SGA-induced weight gain.
5. Drug-Specific Potency:
• High risk: Olanzapine, Clozapine.
• Moderate risk: Risperidone, Quetiapine.
• Low risk: Aripiprazole, Lurasidone, Ziprasidone.
Treatment and Management Strategies
1. Lifestyle Modifications:
• Dietary counseling: Emphasize a balanced diet, portion control, and reducing high-calorie, sugary foods.
• Exercise programs: Encourage regular physical activity tailored to the patient’s capabilities.
2. Pharmacological Interventions:
• Metformin: Often used to manage insulin resistance and reduce weight gain.
• Topiramate: An adjunctive medication with appetite-suppressing properties.
• GLP-1 receptor agonists (e.g., liraglutide): Promising in reducing weight gain and improving metabolic parameters.
• Amantadine: May reduce SGA-induced weight gain through dopaminergic modulation.
• Switching SGAs: Consider lower-risk alternatives such as aripiprazole or lurasidone.
3. Behavioral Interventions:
• Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT): Can address emotional eating and improve adherence to lifestyle changes.
• Motivational interviewing: Helps patients build commitment to weight management goals.
4. Regular Monitoring:
• Weight and BMI: Monitor weight regularly.
• Metabolic parameters: Track blood glucose, HbA1c, and lipid profiles.
• Early intervention: Address weight gain as soon as it starts to minimize long-term impact.
5. Emerging Therapies:
• Investigational drugs targeting 5-HT2C or MC4R pathways.
• Genetic testing to predict individual susceptibility and guide SGA choice.
Clinical Recommendations
• Individualized approach: Tailor interventions based on the patient’s psychiatric condition, overall health, and preferences.
• Interdisciplinary collaboration: Psychiatrists, primary care physicians, and dietitians should work together to address weight gain.
• Shared decision-making: Involve the patient in choosing a strategy that aligns with their goals and needs.
Proper management of SGA-induced weight gain can significantly enhance treatment adherence, quality of life, and long-term health outcomes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freud%27s_Last_Session (Amazon Prime Video)
寄信；全聯，水晶皂 / 啤酒；好朋友，置花盤（2中）；明 ppt；取信後，報備支援；取消續訂 Evernote，Amazon Prime Video ，MyVideo（till 114-7)，Apple TV；維持續訂 Perlego / Everand (Scribd) / Webex / SEA (maybe) / Netflix / ChatGPT 4.0 / SA (maybe) / Z lib / CHPD (Hogrefe)；少看少聽，唯點起紙菸，看著遠方；考慮岩谷（Iwatani) (濾掛咖啡)；需戶外杯；Philip 行動電源（Asus，iPad) 即可，不需攜帶式儲能行動電源；世間渣滓，糟粕充斥，唯須敬重，創意純度；不考慮 Carlat Total Access（$689，太貴)；三商巧福，十分難吃；混口飯吃，車行台灣；中國觀察，培養判斷；禮失求諸野；
先生游南鎮，一友指岩中花樹問曰：「天下無心外之物。如此花樹，在深山中自開自落，於我心亦何相關？」先生曰：「你未看此花時，此花與汝心同歸於寂。你來看此花時，則此花顏色一時明白起來。便知此花不在你的心外。」岩中花樹曰：「汝二人未看我時，我與汝心同歸於寂。汝來看我時，則汝心顏色一時明白起來。便知汝不在我心外。」
Your question raises a paradox that is central to the deconstruction of concepts like evil in the politics of friendship and postmodern philosophy. The claim that “evil does not exist anymore” because it is deconstructed does not mean that evil is erased or that it is “evil to talk about evil.” Instead, deconstruction challenges how we define, use, and weaponize the concept of evil. Let’s break this down:
1. What Does It Mean to Deconstruct Evil?
• Deconstruction does not deny the reality of harm, suffering, or destructive actions often labeled as “evil.” Instead, it questions the concept of evil as an absolute, universal category.
• It asks:
• How is “evil” constructed historically, culturally, and politically?
• Who defines what is evil, and for what purpose?
• How does the label “evil” function to exclude, dehumanize, or justify violence against the “other”?
• By deconstructing “evil,” Derrida and similar thinkers show that what is called “evil” is often contextual, relational, and contingent.
2. If Evil Is Deconstructed, Does It Still Exist?
• Deconstruction does not deny the reality of acts that cause harm or suffering, but it resists framing them within an absolute, metaphysical concept of “evil.”
• This shift means that:
• Instead of saying “evil exists,” we examine the underlying dynamics of harm, power, and enmity without resorting to an oversimplified moral category.
• Evil, as a fixed idea, dissolves, but acts of harm and suffering remain real and need to be addressed.
3. Is It Evil to Talk About Evil?
• Deconstructing the concept of evil does not make it “evil” to talk about evil. Rather, it invites us to be cautious about how we use the term.
• Labeling something or someone as “evil” often has the effect of:
• Closing off dialogue.
• Justifying punitive or exclusionary actions.
• Absolving the person or group labeling others as “evil” from self-reflection or accountability.
• In this sense, using the term “evil” uncritically can perpetuate harm, but the discussion of evil as a concept remains valuable as long as it is approached with critical awareness.
4. Ambiguity and Ethical Responsibility:
• Deconstruction reveals the ambiguity of moral categories, which can feel destabilizing because it denies the comfort of moral absolutes.
• However, this ambiguity does not absolve us of ethical responsibility. Instead, it demands a more nuanced, context-sensitive approach to harm and justice.
5. Practical Implications: Addressing Harm Without “Evil”:
• If we move beyond “evil” as a concept, we can still:
• Recognize harm and suffering.
• Hold individuals or systems accountable.
• Seek justice and reconciliation without resorting to rigid moral binaries.
• For example, rather than saying “this person is evil,” we might examine the circumstances, structures, or relationships that led to harmful actions and seek ways to address them constructively.
Conclusion:
Deconstructing “evil” does not mean evil no longer exists in any form, nor does it mean it is “evil” to discuss evil. Instead, deconstruction asks us to critically analyze how we use the concept of evil and to move beyond simplistic moral judgments. By doing so, we create space for a deeper, more ethical engagement with harm, suffering, and justice. However, this approach requires us to navigate ambiguity and resist the temptation of moral absolutes, which can be both liberating and challenging.