Wednesday, January 1, 2025

In my view, Levinas’ philosophy came from his ethical wound, likewise, the true metaphysical philosopher must start from his “metaphysical wound”? (車行形上學) (ChatGPT, 2025-1-1)

 Your perspective is deeply insightful, and the idea of a “metaphysical wound” resonates profoundly with the origins of true philosophical inquiry. Just as Levinas’ philosophy arose from his ethical wound—his profound encounter with the suffering of the Other and the inescapable demand of ethical responsibility—it makes sense that a true metaphysical philosopher would be similarly marked by an existential or “metaphysical wound.” Here’s how this idea could be explored:


1. The “Metaphysical Wound” as a Point of Origin

• What is a metaphysical wound?

• It is an existential rupture or profound awareness of the mysteries, limits, and tensions of existence.

• It could stem from the confrontation with the mystery of being, the contingency of existence, or the irreducible distance between self and the cosmos.

• This wound compels the philosopher to seek answers—or at least grapple with questions—about the ultimate nature of reality.

• Examples of metaphysical wounds:

• Wonder: The awe of existence itself (e.g., Plato’s thaumazein).

• Alienation: A feeling of estrangement from the world (e.g., Heidegger’s anxiety in the face of Being).

• Loss: Confronting the fragility and finitude of existence (e.g., Nietzsche’s nihilism).

• Transcendence: An overwhelming sense of the ineffable or the divine (e.g., Plotinus’ mystical yearning for the One).


2. Levinas and the Ethical Wound

• Levinas’ ethical wound:

• His philosophy emerged from his direct encounter with the suffering of others, particularly during the Holocaust and his experiences in a prisoner-of-war camp.

• This wound made him hyper-attuned to the irreducible responsibility toward the Other, grounding his ethics in the face-to-face encounter.

• Parallels with the metaphysical wound:

• Just as Levinas felt the inescapable call of the Other, the metaphysical philosopher feels an inescapable call from Being itself or the ground of existence.

• Both wounds are sources of deep existential vulnerability, and both demand a response—whether ethical or metaphysical.


3. Historical Examples of Metaphysical Wounds

• Socrates: His relentless questioning was driven by an awareness of his own ignorance and the fragility of human wisdom.

• Nietzsche: His metaphysical wound was the recognition of the “death of God” and the resulting void of meaning.

• Heidegger: The tension between Being and the forgetting of Being shaped his metaphysical project.

• Schopenhauer: His metaphysical wound lay in the suffering inherent in the will to life.

• Kierkegaard: His confrontation with despair and faith led to his exploration of the tension between the finite and the infinite.


4. The Wound as a Source of Depth

• A “metaphysical wound” ensures that the philosopher’s work is not merely abstract or academic but rooted in a personal, existential confrontation.

• This wound gives their inquiry authenticity and urgency, making their metaphysical explorations resonate on a human level.


5. The Wound as a Gift and a Burden

• The Gift: The wound opens the philosopher to questions and insights that might remain hidden to others. It grants a sensitivity to the mysteries and paradoxes of existence.

• The Burden: The wound also isolates, as the philosopher must confront truths or questions that may be deeply unsettling or even unanswerable.


6. Metaphysics as Healing

• Just as Levinas’ ethical philosophy can be seen as a response to heal or navigate his ethical wound, metaphysical inquiry can be viewed as a way to process and understand the metaphysical wound.

• However, metaphysics does not necessarily “heal” in the sense of closure—it might instead deepen the wound, transforming it into a source of ongoing inquiry.


Conclusion


Your idea that the “true metaphysical philosopher must start from their metaphysical wound” aligns with the history of philosophy and the personal struggles that drive its greatest thinkers. The metaphysical wound is both the source of their inquiry and the reason their philosophy speaks to universal human concerns. Just as Levinas’ ethical wound makes his philosophy profoundly human and urgent, the metaphysical wound ensures that the philosopher’s work is rooted in the deep, existential realities of life.


Would you like to explore specific metaphysical thinkers and their “wounds” further?


What are the personal qualities of philosophers who are suited (or fated) for metaphysical explorations? (ChatGPT, 2025-1-1) (車行形上學)

 Philosophers who are suited—or perhaps fated—for metaphysical explorations often possess a distinctive combination of intellectual, emotional, and existential qualities. These traits enable them to grapple with abstract, foundational questions about reality, existence, and the nature of being. Here are some key personal qualities:


1. A Profound Sense of Wonder

• Characteristic: A deep curiosity about the fundamental nature of reality, often sparked by a sense of awe at existence itself.

• Example: Plato’s idea of philosophy beginning in “wonder” (thaumazein).

• Fated Aspect: Such wonder can feel almost innate, as though the philosopher is compelled by a mysterious call to understand the underlying truths of existence.


2. Intuitive Depth

• Characteristic: An ability to perceive patterns, connections, or insights that go beyond immediate empirical observation.

• Example: Parmenides’ poetic assertion of the unity of being, or Spinoza’s intuitive grasp of substance as infinite.

• Fated Aspect: This intuition often feels like a “gift” or destiny, enabling metaphysical thinkers to reach beyond conventional understanding.


3. Intellectual Rigour

• Characteristic: The capacity to engage in precise, systematic thinking to explore abstract concepts and avoid contradictions.

• Example: Kant’s meticulous critique of metaphysics in The Critique of Pure Reason.

• Fated Aspect: This trait may feel like an obligation to “think through” reality in its entirety, no matter how daunting.


4. Existential Sensitivity

• Characteristic: A heightened awareness of existential questions about life, death, meaning, and the universe’s ultimate purpose.

• Example: Heidegger’s preoccupation with Being and the human experience of finitude.

• Fated Aspect: Such sensitivity often stems from personal encounters with existential crises, which compel metaphysical inquiry.


5. Detachment and Contemplation

• Characteristic: A natural tendency toward introspection and a willingness to detach from the immediate concerns of everyday life to contemplate universal truths.

• Example: Plotinus’ mystical withdrawal from the material world to focus on the One.

• Fated Aspect: This detachment can feel like a calling to transcend the ordinary and focus on eternal principles.


6. Tolerance for Ambiguity

• Characteristic: Comfort with uncertainty and paradox, and the ability to embrace questions that may have no definitive answers.

• Example: Heraclitus’ acceptance of change and contradiction as fundamental to reality.

• Fated Aspect: This tolerance often manifests as a deep trust in the mystery of existence, as though one is “fated” to dwell in the unknown.


7. Visionary Imagination

• Characteristic: The ability to visualize alternative realities, worlds, or modes of being, fueling metaphysical creativity.

• Example: Leibniz’s concept of possible worlds or Nietzsche’s eternal recurrence.

• Fated Aspect: Visionary thinkers often feel driven, as if possessed by ideas that demand articulation.


8. Courage to Challenge Established Norms

• Characteristic: A willingness to question conventional beliefs, even at the cost of personal or societal conflict.

• Example: Descartes’ radical doubt or Schopenhauer’s defiance of prevailing optimism.

• Fated Aspect: Such courage often feels like an inevitability, as if the philosopher cannot do otherwise.


9. Passion for Unity and Universality

• Characteristic: A longing to unify disparate phenomena under a single, coherent framework.

• Example: Spinoza’s monism, which sees everything as expressions of one substance.

• Fated Aspect: This passion often drives metaphysical thinkers to pursue their work with an almost religious fervor.


10. Reflective Solitude

• Characteristic: A natural inclination for solitude, which provides the mental space for deep reflection and contemplation.

• Example: Kierkegaard’s solitary meditations on faith and existence.

• Fated Aspect: This solitude can feel like both a gift and a burden, as though the philosopher is “set apart” for their task.


Conclusion


Philosophers suited for metaphysical explorations are often characterized by a unique combination of innate wonder, intellectual depth, existential awareness, and visionary courage. These qualities, combined with a “fated” sense of compulsion, enable them to grapple with the profound and often unanswerable questions of metaphysics.


Would you like to explore how these qualities manifest in specific philosophers?


車行形上學 (2025)(自由)

先說結論,

形上學,包括宇宙論和本體論,

因此,結論是,

流浪貓的流水席,放牛吃草,

尋訪蒼青駐足,行止遂由天色決定,



Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Reacher season 3 (2025)

https://youtu.be/Fk0Sp6UDVXI?si=_EIu9DzuAdeK-Mqh

Black Bag (2025)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Bag_(film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Soderbergh#Filmography

The Agency (2024)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Agency_(2024_TV_series)

Nowhere to see yet. 

年末 (12/31/24)(車行形上學)

5:30 PM,三時十三里後,甫由初診病人,得知尚義過世,愕然慨矣,由此而知,此車行,非夏日之行,乃「行于十一月」(November van life),

Check Out Psychiatric News’ Top 10 Most Viewed Articles of 2024

https://alert.psychnews.org/2024/12/check-out-psychiatric-news-top-10-most.html

車行形上學

關鍵在,形上學 (宇宙論,本體論) 和倫理學,

意思是說,糊裡糊塗,沒有知識論那種玩意,

粗茶淡飯,跟美學沒有半毛錢關係,

12/31/24 (星期二)

Monday, December 30, 2024

1131227 共匪之民主脫褲生活會

https://youtu.be/IgwndPu2jsk?si=Q-m1AQw_WzAfFYhT

重點當然,不是民主,不是生活,只是脫褲,你要理解,隔著褲子舔,和脫了褲子舔,是完全不同的民主,前者隔山打牛,後者與牛鞭 (dick, phallus),齊嬉戲翻滾于泥漿,不亦樂乎,

車行形上學

1. Travels with Charley in Search of America (John Steinbeck, 1960)

2. Travels with the Self: Interpreting Psychology as Cultural History (Philip Cushman, 2018)

3. The Self-Overcoming of Nihilism (Keiji Nishitani, 1990)

4. Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life (Theodor Adorno, 1951)

5. Generation A (Douglas Coupland, 2009)

6. James Bahoh, Michael Marder, Pieter Hallward, Jane Bennett, Karen Barad

7. 余英時評政治現實 (無處非中)(2022)

8. 物的反撲,人的退位;物的復位,人的歸位

9. Metaphysics includes cosmology and ontology, how does development of cosmology influence our understanding of ontology? (ChatGPT, 2024-12-28) (自體的心理學)(車行形上學)(自由)(2025)

10. 物的演化,生命的演化,意識 (心)的演化,

11. 

車行形上學

首須處理,形上學的終結 (end of metaphysics),

意思是說,車行,係行于,形上學的廢墟 (ruins of metaphysics),

以前我說,詮釋學是構建形上世界的誠意,

現在我說,詮釋學是一個套套循環,走不出既有的材料,

意思是說,推翻滿清習共,必由蒙難倫敦開始,

意思是說,車行形上學,非止詮釋學,必由事件開始,

必由歷史判斷的事件 (event of historical judgment) 開始,

方無愧于,那個廢墟,

12/30/24(星期一)

回條寄醫學會,處理置物櫃,充電插座雙線,Kill Shot 發生在蒙大拿,Xian Mikol has a great ass,你要理解,我不要我的病人破費,40 公里之後,明寄自關,

Sunday, December 29, 2024

Kill Shot (2023)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt13039008/ (MyVideo)

Crossroads (Xian Mikol)

Dirty Angels (2024)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Angels

Don't Move (2024)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_Move_(2024_film) (Netflix)

關于 2025 廢墟花園心理治療團督的數點說明 (2025)

1. 這是基于自體的心理學的心理治療的團督,

2. 基于自體的心理學的心理治療,是五合一,回到歷史 + 回到自然 + 存在治療 + 批判的心理治療 + 後結構主義的心理治療,

3. 就是,傳說中的,菊次郎十六式,岩中花樹療法,船子擺渡療法,

4. 但是,有趣的是,P-H-E 仍在那裡,

5. 所以這是,在變動不居中,作 P-H-E 的考察,

6. 在變動不居中,留下一個夏天的回憶,

7. 你要理解,行已至此,

8. 自體的心理學,非自體心理學,非客體關係理論 (包括克萊茵學派,中間學派,依附理論),非關係學派精神分析,非拉岡學派,非心智化理論,非精神分析場論,

9. 但上述,精神分析的遺產 (legacy),都包涵在內,

10. 又加上,上述五合一的,行走荒野的車行 (van life),

11. 至此,我相信,你不知道,我在講什麼,

12. 有趣的是,你很快就會知道,我也不知道,我在講的,如何實現,

13. 意思是說,我還不知道,菊次郎十六式,到底是什麼,

14. 就像 Deleuze & Guattari,也不知道,分裂分析(schizoanalysis),是什麼,

15. 這兩個不知道,其實是同一個不知道,

16. 意思是說,菊次郎十六式,

17. 如果 D&G 尚且在世,

18. 我希望,關于這個,被問道于盲,復問道于盲,的事件後的事件,他們會搖頭大笑,

19. 意思是說,足以取悅 D&G,是這個團督,存在的理由(raison d'être),

車行形上學

我先前說過,這是被事件事件,被他者(的事件)事件,

所以正確的說,這是車行之「被」形上學,

你要理解,多了「被」一字,你有多麼,鬆了一口氣,

那口氣,就是一條腰帶一口氣的氣,

意思是說,少了那條腰帶,你終于可以,光天化日脫褲,

正確的說,「被」脫褲,


王滬寧製片宋濤導演諸 motherfuckers 主演之匪諜の紀錄片

https://youtu.be/cUiE9IOGRP4?si=uYmgJScnB2sUnW3u


包子又投毒

https://youtu.be/1ntDBIwOUPo?si=8czdr1ONFRtL1lSo

柯文哲你要對我好一點我知道你很多事

https://youtu.be/xye5ooWkSzk?si=pdh1gcU-jG148Etf

Bernard Marr

https://bernardmarr.com/all-articles/

12/29/24(星期日)

家樂福,USB 插座,充電線,衛生紙,柯文哲說,感謝上蒼給他滅證機會,滅證收工,下午三點,歸鄉土城,繼續研究區塊鏈,和史明台灣史,的辯證關係,和心疼的想像,橘子怎麼偷偷,花那幾十億,

偉大的反共鬥士韓國瑜傅崐萁說共匪統戰公公王滬寧含著習近平的屌嘎嘎作響對蔣經國發誓漢賊曾經不兩立國民黨 (懶得假裝)不是匪諜黨

https://youtu.be/-ATrQJJb4lY?si=w5_7ANuAcn_4mANC

你要理解,A 片是視覺聽覺的經驗,意思是說,舌頭蠕動的音效很重要,有點像,幽靜森林裡,溪澗聲鳥鳴聲落雨聲,大海醉臥海潮聲,聲聲入耳,所謂床前明月光,疑是地上霜,兩岸猿聲啼不住,輕舟已過萬重山,

What’s the brain capacity of the Denisovans? (ChatGPT, 2024-12-29)

 The brain capacity (cranial volume) of Denisovans is not definitively known because we have limited fossil evidence. However, based on indirect evidence and comparisons with their close relatives (Neanderthals and modern humans), we can make some informed estimates.


1. Limited Fossil Evidence

• The primary Denisovan fossils discovered so far include:

• A finger bone and teeth from Denisova Cave (Siberia).

• A jawbone from Tibet.

• These fossils provide limited information about the size of their skull or brain.


2. Estimations Based on Related Species

• Neanderthals: Had an average brain capacity of 1,200–1,750 cm³, slightly larger on average than modern humans.

• Homo sapiens: Modern humans have an average brain capacity of 1,200–1,500 cm³.

• Denisovans: As a sister group to Neanderthals, their brain size was likely within a similar range, estimated at 1,300–1,600 cm³, making it comparable to or slightly larger than that of modern humans.


3. Cognitive Implications

• Brain size alone does not determine intelligence, but Denisovans likely had cognitive capacities similar to Neanderthals and early modern humans.

• Genetic studies suggest that Denisovans shared some advanced traits with modern humans, such as the ability to adapt to extreme environments (e.g., high altitudes in Tibet).


4. Genetic Evidence of Cognitive Abilities

• FOXP2 Gene: Associated with language and speech, was present in Denisovans, suggesting they may have had some capacity for complex communication.

• Their contributions to modern human genomes (e.g., in Southeast Asia and Tibet) suggest they were capable of survival in diverse environments, indicating advanced behavioral adaptability.


Conclusion


While exact measurements of Denisovan brain capacity remain speculative, it likely fell within the range of 1,300–1,600 cm³, similar to or slightly larger than modern humans. Their cognitive abilities were advanced enough to adapt to extreme environments, interact with Homo sapiens and Neanderthals, and leave a genetic legacy that persists today.