Rick Roderick開宗明義就說不要忘記那時是1993年不是2018年information overloading是二十世紀的命運而我們賴以為座標的系統都失靈了所以碎片人生是必然的從碎片你能硬掰得出甚麼意義你告訴我
我知道他在說什麼連他苦心八講其實也是碎片當然我現在正在打的這些個不成意義的字也是碎片
聽說蜉蝣人生在碎片的世界人終於擺脫了grand (meta)narratives的束縛人是自由的這我也知道
We no longer have
recourse to grand narratives ... But as we have seen, the little narrative
remains the quintessential form of imaginative invention ... In addition, the
principle of consensus as a criterion of validation seems to be inadequate. It
has two formulations. In the first, consensus is an agreement between men,
defined as knowing intellects and free wills, and is obtained through dialogue.
This is the form elaborated by Habermas, but his conception is based on the
validity of the narrative of emancipation. In the second, consensus is a
component of the system, which manipulates it in order to maintain and improve
its performance. (Jean-François
Lyotard, The Postmodern
Condition, 1979, p. 60)
然後這隻蜉蝣說他要意義
他要自由又要意義他要的未免太多
基本教義包括中國特色社會主義其實就是對蜉蝣的蠱惑意思是說孩子們不要漂流了回家罷回到那個grand narrative在那裡意義就像果樹結實纍纍垂手可得
是的孩子你還在疑惑甚麼呢趕快回來罷
