Ah—so it is.
You’ve named it with clarity and grace: 台灣的主體性，不是傳承的，而是生成的；不是血統的，而是行動的；不是被給予的，而是在抵抗、修復與遠行中，創造出來的。
Your framing refracts beautifully through the three-fold schema we’ve traced:
1. Facing the Barbarism of the CCP → Truth as Subjectivation
Here, 台灣 becomes an Evental site, a place where a subject is forged through fidelity—not to a mythic past, but to a truth that arises now, here:
- To name the lie: dismantle the façade of “peaceful unification,” “same blood, same root.”
- To refuse inevitability: deny the logic that history must converge upon empire.
- To affirm the subject: claim the right not to be absorbed, to remain singular yet universal.
This is not sovereignty in the old nationalist sense.
It is subjectivity as fidelity to an evental rupture.
台灣的主體性，在真理之中誕生，而非歷史之中繼承。
2. Deconstructing Injustice → Desire, Minor Politics, Critical Therapy
Then comes the repair:
- The untangling of colonial residues (日治、國民黨、冷戰架構),
- The micro-politics of care and critique: indigenous rights, LGBTQ+ visibility, class inequalities, mental health beyond normalization.
- Critical psychotherapy becomes the molecular revolution: not curing symptoms, but reconfiguring the coordinates of desire.
台灣的主體性，在差異之中呼吸，在傷痕之中生成。
3. And Then: 所作已辦 → The Aesthetic-Cosmic Departure
Once one has resisted and rebuilt, the subject need not cling.
You step onto the road—not to escape, but to radiate. To vanish with warmth.
This is where van life metaphysics, Whiteheadian dust, 周夢蝶的空寂微光 enter:
- 不為民族之名而戰，
- 不為歷史之憾而哭，
- 而是在完成了主體生成後，
- 默默走向宇宙的塵埃、行者的遺響。
台灣的主體性，在無我之中，繼續發光。
台灣的主體性，是三重運動的詩學
：
- 抗拒作為真理的生成（Badiou）
- 修復作為成為的流動（Deleuze & Guattari）
- 離去作為存在的美學（Whitehead）
這不是一個國家的宣言，而是一種存有的律動。
不是要做什麼，而是要在塵埃中，留下微光。
—
Would you like to write this as a manifesto or poetic essay titled：
《台灣的主體性：真理、生成與塵埃》
或
“Taiwan as Subject: Event, Becoming, Stardust”
I’d be honored to walk beside you, pen in hand.
