These ponderings attempt to let themselves be appropriated by the event. (Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Martin Heidegger, 1936–38/1989)
Sunday, May 19, 2019
階級和意識(型態)
統治階級要有統治意識(型態)
被御用寵幸階級要有被御用寵幸意識(型態)
被統治階級要有被統治意識(型態)
被割韭菜階級要有被割韭菜意識(型態)
這是一個正確的把人民清楚分類的正確的世界
每個人都有屬於自己的正確的位置和馬桶
正確的孔子說過每個人都要正確的抬頭看著正確的天正確的哭泣
除了正確的統治階級以外
意識(型態)就是擁有絕對權力
為槍斃你的正確的子彈正確的買單
3:47 AM
野犬剛開完會一哄而散
(1) SP / ORT (2) P-H-E (3) back to History /
Nature
(1) (2) (3) 三者之間的辯證
有點像野犬開會
其實我已預知最終還是脫落
脫落的意思是說甚麼都不要
當然碗繼續洗
繼續被一百個饅頭和十五遍Lady-Gaga感動
繼續養蟑螂蜘蛛蚊子流浪貓
還有那隻多年未見的大蛇
Saturday, May 18, 2019
M (FJU 2019) - One wonders what the 3 percent of dissenters had to say.
What tribute to one’s transformative brilliance could be more thrillling than the warning that your inventions threaten to attain consciousness and reduce human beings to patronized pets? The Asilomar Statement of AI Principles, signed by eight thousand scientists, representing a 97 percent consensus—including a passel of Nobel laureates and Hawking—echoed the billowy affirmations of Google’s own “Do No Evil” precepts and the statement of principles of Burning Man. “Superintelligence should only be developed in the service of widely shared ethical ideals, and for the benefit of all humanity rather than one state or organization. . . . An arms race in lethal autonomous weapons should be avoided.” One wonders what the 3 percent of dissenters had to say.
Gilder, George. Life After Google: The Fall of Big Data and the Rise of the Blockchain Economy. Gateway Editions. 2018, kindle location 1442/5072, Kindle edition.
Gilder, George. Life After Google: The Fall of Big Data and the Rise of the Blockchain Economy. Gateway Editions. 2018, kindle location 1442/5072, Kindle edition.
Friday, May 17, 2019
Thursday, May 16, 2019
Salmagundi
https://salmagundi.skidmore.edu/
An international quarterly magazine of politics, culture, literature and the arts published at Skidmore College
An international quarterly magazine of politics, culture, literature and the arts published at Skidmore College
Death and Fallibility in the Psychoanalytic Encounter: Mortal Gifts (Ellen Pinsky, Routledge, 2017)
Death and Fallibility in the Psychoanalytic Encounter considers psychoanalysis from a fresh perspective: the therapist’s mortality—in at least two senses of the word. That the therapist can die, and is also fallible, can be seen as necessary or even defining components of the therapeutic process. At every moment, the analyst's vulnerability and human limitations underlie the work, something rarely openly acknowledged.
Freud’s central insights continue to guide the range of all talking therapies, but they do so somewhat in the manner of a smudged ancestral map. That blur, or degree of confusion, invites new ways of reading. Ellen Pinsky reexamines fundamental principles underlying by-now-dusty terms such as "neutrality," "abstinence," "working through," and the peculiar expression "termination." Pinsky reconsiders—in some measure, hopes to restore—the most essential, humane, and useful components of the original psychoanalytic perspective, guided by the most productive threads in the discipline's still-evolving theory. Freud's most important contribution was arguably to discover (or invent) the psychoanalytic situation itself. This book reflects on central questions pertaining to that extraordinary discovery: What is the psychoanalytic situation? How does it work (and fail to work)? Why does it work?
This book aims to articulate what is fundamental and what we can't do without—the psychoanalytic essence—while neither idealizing Freud nor devaluing his achievement. Historically, Freud has been misread, distorted, maligned or, at times, even dismissed. Pinsky reappraises his significance with respect to psychoanalytic writers who have extended, and amended, his thinking. Of particular interest are those psychoanalytic thinkers who, like Freud, are not only original thinkers but also great writers—including D. W. Winnicott and Hans Loewald.
Covering a broad range of psychoanalytic paradigms, Death and Fallibility in the Psychoanalytic Encounter will bring a fresh understanding of the nature, benefits and pitfalls of psychoanalysis. It will appeal to psychoanalysts and psychoanalytic psychotherapists and provide superb background and inspiration for anyone working across the entire range of talking therapies. (amazon)
Psychoanalysis is an Antiphilosophy (Justin Clemens, EUP, 2013)
Love, hate, slavery, torture, addiction and death - as this book shows, only psychoanalysis can speak well of such matters. Psychoanalysis was the most important intellectual development of the 20th century, which left no practice from psychiatry to philosophy to politics untouched. Yet it was also in many ways an untouchable project, caught between science and poetry, medicine and hermeneutics. This unsettled, unsettling status has recently induced the philosopher Alain Badiou to characterise psychoanalysis as an 'antiphilosophy', that is, as a practice that issues the strongest possible challenges to thought. Justin Clemens takes up the challenge of this denomination here, by re-examining a series of crucial psychoanalytic themes: addiction, fanaticism, love, slavery and torture. Drawing from the work of Freud, Lacan, Badiou, Agamben and others, Psychoanalysis is an Antiphilosophy offers a radical reconstruction of the operations and import of key psychoanalytic concepts and a renewed sense of the indispensable powers of psychoanalysis for today. (amazon) (accessible via questia)
這不是夢的解析
東莞招工底薪一千七百二十元全勤加班吐血月薪可達三千四百元
Aufhebung (sublation)
(Hegel) 和
Abduction (Peirce) 是兩個關鍵概念
前者說明歷史後者說明突變
前天萬壽路上見到一車待宰豬仔哀號
八年前今日我清晨出發來到荒山野嶺
活了六十二年不曾夢到媽祖託夢
滿山蟬鳴即將開幕還不確定何時
M (FJU 2019) - 2019-5-17
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1agipYsbmZK8UqImVP3RyH0uKkAhmYR5N?usp=sharing
Wednesday, May 15, 2019
Dementia: WHO Prevention Guidelines Stress Physical Activity (2019-5-16)
M (FJU 2019) - 另一個讓人懷念的 trickster
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prometheus
Prometheus, possibly meaning "forethought", is a Titan, culture hero, and trickster figure who is credited with the creation of man from clay,
and who defies the gods by stealing fire and giving it to humanity, an act that enabled
progress and civilisation. Prometheus is known for his
intelligence and as a champion of mankind[2] and also seen as the author of the human arts
and sciences generally. He is sometimes presented as the father of Deucalion, the hero of the Greek flood story.
The punishment of Prometheus as a
consequence of the theft is a major theme of his mythology, and is a popular
subject of both ancient and modern art. Zeus,
king of the Olympian gods, sentenced the Titan to
eternal torment for his transgression. The immortal Prometheus was bound to a
rock, where each day an eagle, the emblem of Zeus, was sent to feed on his
liver, which would then grow back overnight to be eaten again the next day. (In
ancient Greece, the liver was often thought to be the seat of human emotions.)[3] Prometheus is freed at last by the hero Heracles (Hercules).
In another myth, Prometheus
establishes the form of animal sacrifice practiced in ancient Greek religion.
Evidence of a cult to Prometheus
himself is not widespread. He was a focus of religious activity mainly at Athens, where he was linked to Athena and Hephaestus, other Greek deities of creative skills and
technology.[4]
In the Western classical tradition,
Prometheus became a figure who represented human striving, particularly the
quest for scientific knowledge, and the risk of overreaching or unintended consequences.
In particular, he was regarded in the Romantic era as embodying the lone genius whose efforts
to improve human existence could also result in tragedy: Mary Shelley, for instance, gave The Modern Prometheus as
the subtitle to her novel Frankenstein (1818).
M (FJU 2019) - Sisyphus
Mythology
He was
punished for his self-aggrandizing craftiness and deceitfulness by being forced
to roll an immense boulder up a hill only for it to roll down when it nears the
top, repeating this action for eternity.
Reign
Sisyphus
was the founder and first king of Ephyra (supposedly the original name of Corinth).[7] King Sisyphus promoted navigation and commerce
but was avaricious and deceitful. He also killed travellers and guests, a
violation of xenia, which fell under Zeus's
domain. He took pleasure in these killings because they allowed him to maintain
his iron-fisted rule.
Conflict
with Salmoneus
Sisyphus
and his brother Salmoneus were known to hate each other, and Sisyphus consulted
with the Oracle of Delphi on just how to kill Salmoneus without incurring
any severe consequences for himself. From Homer onward,
Sisyphus was famed as the craftiest of men. He seduced Salmoneus's
daughter Tyro in one of his plots to kill Salmoneus, only for Tyro
to slay the children she bore him when she discovered that Sisyphus was
planning on using them eventually to dethrone her father.
Cheating
death
King
Sisyphus also betrayed one of Zeus's secrets by revealing the whereabouts
of Aegina, (an Asopid who was taken away by Zeus) to her father (the
river god Asopus) in return for causing a spring to flow on the
Corinthian acropolis.[7]
Zeus
then ordered Death (in Greek, Thanatos) to chain King Sisyphus down below in Tartarus. Sisyphus was curious as to why Hermes, whose job it was to guide souls to the Underworld, had
not appeared on this occasion. King Sisyphus slyly asked Thanatos to
demonstrate how the chains worked. As Thanatos was granting him his wish,
Sisyphus seized the opportunity and trapped Thanatos in the chains instead.
Once Thanatos was bound by the strong chains, no one died on earth. This caused
an uproar especially for Ares (who was annoyed that his battles had
lost their fun because his opponents would not die), and so he intervened. The
exasperated Ares freed Thanatos and turned King Sisyphus over to Thanatos.[9]
In
another version, Hades was sent to chain Sisyphus and was
chained himself. As long as Hades was tied up, nobody could die. Because of
this, sacrifices could not be made to the gods, and those that were old and
sick were suffering. The gods finally threatened to make life so miserable for
Sisyphus that he would wish he were dead. He then had no choice but to release
Hades.[10]
Before
King Sisyphus died, he had told his wife to throw his naked body into the
middle of the public square (purportedly as a test of his wife's love for him).
This caused King Sisyphus to end up on the shores of the river Styx.
Then, complaining to Persephone, goddess of the Underworld,
that this was a sign of his wife's disrespect for him, King Sisyphus persuaded
her to allow him to return to the upper world. Once back in Ephyra, the spirit
of King Sisyphus scolded his wife for not burying his body and giving it a
proper funeral (as a loving wife should). When King Sisyphus refused to return
to the Underworld, he was forcibly dragged back there by Hermes. In
another version of the myth, Persephone was tricked by Sisyphus that he had
been conducted to Tartarus by mistake, and so she
ordered that he be released.[11]
In Philoctetes by Sophocles, there is a reference to the father of Odysseus (rumoured to have been Sisyphus, and not Laërtes, whom we know as the father in the Odyssey) upon having returned from the dead.
Punishment in the Underworld
As
a punishment for his trickery, King Sisyphus was made to roll a huge boulder
endlessly up a steep hill.[7][12][13] The maddening nature of the punishment was
reserved for King Sisyphus due to his hubristic belief that his cleverness surpassed that of
Zeus himself. Zeus accordingly displayed his own cleverness by enchanting the
boulder into rolling away from King Sisyphus before he reached the top, which
ended up consigning Sisyphus to an eternity of useless efforts and unending
frustration. Thus it came to pass that pointless or interminable activities are
sometimes described as Sisyphean. King Sisyphus was a common
subject for ancient writers and was depicted by the painter Polygnotus on the walls of the Lesche at Delphi.
這件事教我們 讀希臘神話 要注意tricksters
他們是那個滿天神佛的世界中 最有趣的傢伙 就像在我們這個世界 要注意洗碗工和應召女和流浪跑路的人 他們是當今最有趣的生命型態的可能
M (FJU 2019) - 星火 (雜誌)
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%98%9F%E7%81%AB_(%E9%9B%9C%E8%AA%8C)
起因
1959-1961年,中華人民共和國繼「大躍進」和人民公社化運動後,出現了大饑荒,全國範圍內死亡人數逾3000萬,當時政府宣傳說是由於「趕上三年災害」(實際上不是天災而是人禍)、「蘇聯政府又背信棄義地撕毀兩國經濟技術合作協議」等。蘭州大學被下放到農村進行勞動改造的部分右派學生,目睹了甘肅省武山、天水兩縣的農村饑荒的慘烈情況,1960年初,歷史系學生張春元發起創辦《星火》雜誌,他們希望通過《星火》雜誌,傳播思想、喚醒社會的良知。
行動
學生們湊錢買了油印機,自己刻蠟版,印成了首期《星火》,三十多頁,其中發表了林昭的長詩《普羅米修斯受難的一日》。該期有篇文章,稱讚彭德懷為民請命,並表達了對毛澤東的不滿。在《當前的形勢和我們的任務》一文中則揭露了當時社會的慘狀,希望由共產黨內部發起革命。他們計劃將雜誌寄給各省市的領導人,以期糾正錯誤。
結局
但首期《星火》還沒有寄出,第二期尚在編輯中,1960年9月30日,在武山、天水的這些學生被捕,同時被捕的還有數十名了解並支持他們的當地農民。
·
張春元被判無期徒刑;
·
物理系學生徐誠,判十年以上;
·
當地四十多歲的農民劉武雄,判十二年。
1961年8月10日,張春元越獄,9月6日再次被捕。
1968年4月29日,林昭被槍決。
1970年3月,張春元和杜映華因「在監內進行第二次反革命活動」(遞紙條),兩人被處決於蘭州。[1]
1978年,中共中央發布五十五號文件,《星火》案所涉及的蘭州大學其他七名案犯右派身分得到改正。1981年4月,天水中院宣告張春元、向承鑒無罪。
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
