太史公曰，韓率七十億國軍，乘坐高鐵北伐，勢如破竹，兵分三路，昨入京，今入平壤，明入莫斯科，包金普，嚇得投奔自由去諾魯，推翻「包二」，韓遂稱帝，仿蘇「三」起解，張「三」李四，自封「秦三」，亦稱韓「三」，
Tuesday, January 16, 2024
Monday, January 15, 2024
Protein topology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein_topology
The Topological Properties of the Protein Universe
意思是說，拉岡玩的是蛋白質，蛋白質的秘密，就是拓樸學，
Mysticism East and East Comparing Sankara and Nagarjuna On Absolute Reality
https://www.scribd.com/document/57517478/Mysticism-East-and-East-Comparing-Sankara-and-Nagarjuna-on-Absolute-Reality
Nagarjuna and Samkara (Shankara): Some Comparative Reflections
https://www.medhajournal.com/nagarjuna-and-samkara-some-comparative-reflections/
印度二大哲，一是龍樹，一是 Adi Shankara，前者屬佛學，後者屬印度教，印度明顯看重辯師，思考清晰，口才便捷，能言善道者為上，但我不確定，論辯嘴皮，是否等同，道行功力，
Buddhist influences on Advaita Vedanta
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_influences_on_Advaita_Vedanta
Nagarjuna & Shankara on The Two Truths (2017)
https://elizabeth-reninger.com/two-truths-nagarjuna-shankara/
共匪廿大，怎麼投票？「贊成的舉手」
https://youtu.be/-JDi9aGlfow?si=lhlOKUZmLrT1-jRe
你要理解，舉手等同脫褲，不舉手等同不脫褲，褲子是文明的底線 （但是共匪與文明無關），穿褲子很重要，不信你脫了褲子，上街看看，
2：35 AM (1/15/23) (星期一) (negativity vs vitality)
空間之為空間，關鍵在空，福德之為福德，關鍵在德，按部就班，照表操課，竟有初春的味道，也許，明下午，送件簽約，有限的準確的，關於被佔據的時間，無限的無所謂的，關於自由的時間，我先前說過，前者是島嶼，後者是海洋，印度教，Vitality > Negativity，意思是說，佛學，Negativity > Vitality，印度人不喜歡，意思是說，佛學源自印度，卻在印度式微，是有道理的，漢傳之後，印度佛學，與儒道相遇的結果是，中國人不善極端偏鋒，凡事喜取其中庸，「庸了半天」，Negativity > Vitality 的佛學，變成加了太多冰水的琴酒，「每個人都尿急，但是沒有人喝得爛醉」，意思是說，二千五百年中國人，除了魯智深禪宗和尚宋明理學家七等生施明德豬哥亮，率皆「半吊子」Negativity，加上「半吊子」 Vitality，就算過了，1/2 + 1/2 = 1 (意思是說，半吊子加半吊子，就以為等於一），面面俱到的，不敢得罪人，也不願吃虧的，窩囊的一生，至於日本，沒有太嚴重的儒道包袱，以致 Negativity = Vitality，意思是說，N 和 V 旗鼓相當 （甚至 N > V)，遂激盪出忍者浪人宮本武藏三上寬明田川荘之，和酣暢空無的 A 片偵探小說，意思是說，日本人的人生比例，比中國人有趣，至於台灣，被日本殖民五十年，只學到大啖生魚片，沒有學到宮本武藏，倒吊樹林擺盪的精神，喜歡 A 片，但是又學不來，當然也沒有偵探，或偵探小說，你要理解，偵探不是掌管社會控制的警察，偵探是哲學人類學家 （philosophical anthropologist)，
Sunday, January 14, 2024
胖子方的言stone記都說包子惱羞成怒氣急敗壞走投無路自毀他毀玉石俱焚今天下午兩點十七分將發動攻台
https://youtu.be/tywM2flT4b4?si=WIR9Txb_m5MLCs1E
https://youtu.be/v0S-PxrQ5xY?si=LdMG5M4RNYgbZXx2
https://youtu.be/VCYAlDjsx_I?si=ZNcH1KwcCBtIU0Ex
包子槍斃王滬寧宋濤和七千萬台灣匪諜後
我們先前說過，包子單手，開著山東號，投奔自由來台，南寮漁港，棄船登陸，現已統聯客運，抵達湖口休息站，正在和馬英九韓國瑜，一起吃懷舊便當，你要理解，我吃過三年半懷舊便當，百吃不厭，記得要單點，三年前六十九元，現八十五元，一個不飽，兩個太多，意思是說，營銷策略，很有技巧，
工具性 (Negativity vs Vitality)
剛剛突然知道，凡事壞就壞在，工具二字，
比如說，
nothing but means to an end，為達目的，不擇手段，意思是說，不擇工具，
工具理性，意思是說，理性只是工具，黑面琵鷺，只是補充蛋白質，胡鑫宇，只是一顆新鮮待宰的肝臟，鐵鏈女，只是栓起來隨時可以打炮的一條母狗，活人生吃，心肝只是下酒小菜，
胡鑫宇事件
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E8%83%A1%E9%91%AB%E5%AE%87%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6
豐縣生育八孩女子事件
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E4%B8%B0%E5%8E%BF%E7%94%9F%E8%82%B2%E5%85%AB%E5%AD%A9%E5%A5%B3%E5%AD%90%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6
關於廣西文革中的殺人吃人事件
https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B/20161105-%E9%97%9C%E6%96%BC%E5%BB%A3%E8%A5%BF%E6%96%87%E9%9D%A9%E4%B8%AD%E7%9A%84%E6%AE%BA%E4%BA%BA%E5%90%83%E4%BA%BA%E4%BA%8B%E4%BB%B6
回到工具理性，當理性變成工具，一切都變成有效的手段，
有效 (effective)，進而用實證 (evidence-based)，為其背書，
這就是，我們的當今世界，
既然有工具理性，那麼有沒有工具非理性？
Artaud，心因性瞻妄 (psychogenic delirium)，嘶喊至死，明顯是把非理性，作為創作工具，
意思是說，在意識和潛意識的邊界，Artaud 沒有邊防 (barrier)，
這是創造力的代價，意思是說，Artaud 的人生，我是說，光天化日，變成一場「醒著的夢」 (waking dream)，
中國古人，對自然情有獨鍾，歸納出節氣循環，意思是說，心中有節氣，你我遂在天地中，找到自然的家，
中國古人，對眾生情有獨鍾，歸納出尊天地敬鬼神，夢蝶夢烏蠅，意思是說，心中有生命義理，你我遂在天地中，找到歷史的家，
這兩種優美，超越了工具性，人和自然，人和人，的工具性，
Vitality，就是這兩種優美，
Negativity，就是失去這兩種優美，只剩下工具性，
Saturday, January 13, 2024
大局
整場戲，兩個節點，一是藍白配破局，二是馬英九舔共，前者四三三成局，後者讓國民黨釋出五十萬票給柯文哲，讓柯文哲坐大，結果是，民進黨再做四年，我先前說過，「這是必要的」，因為外交國防大方向，必須由他們延續，至於內政，這從來不是蔡英文長項，你怎麼可以期待大小姐洗碗，柯文哲顯然騙了不少年輕人，不過四年後，這些年輕人初通人世，就會放棄跟他玩，意思是說，到時候，再來騙下一批年輕人，至於立法院，國民民眾皆為在野，合起來當然比民進黨多，但是柯文哲骨子裡是偏綠的，喬事情，交換利益，他不會吃虧，「事實上他從來都沒有吃過虧」，但是牽涉親共媚共舔共的大政方針，我相信他不會跟著國民黨玩，意思是說，柯文哲的長處就是左右逢源，不吃虧，但是骨子裡，(起碼我希望) 他知道什麼是賣台，至於國民黨，趙少康當然繼續玩他的中廣，和戰情室跑不完的火車，也沒有吃虧，侯友宜在新北繼續玩，也沒有吃虧，所以，整場戲下來，最有趣的是，「沒有人吃虧」，至於匪諜們，今晚當然是忙著寫悔過書，跟王滬寧宋濤匯報，但是，更有趣的是，包括王宋，也沒有人吃虧，意思是說，「該撈的都撈了」，意思是說，小結，「天佑台灣」，最重要的是，台灣外交國防大政，沒有落入親共媚共舔共的國民黨手裡，柯文哲則基本上，只是一個渾水摸魚的角色，這點他比誰都清楚，柯粉則長大後，就會知道，意思是說，成熟是要付出代價的，但其實，沒有人吃虧，意思是說，沒有人須要付出什麼鳥代價，PS 剛才國台辦說，包子駕駛山東號，投奔自由來台，學習民主，然後潛回大陸，推行民主，另不止一個評論者說，立法院三黨不過半，勢必會亂，意思是說，國台辦令國民黨推韓國瑜出來，操作議事，意在搗蛋，意思是說，國民黨除了「親共」「媚共」「舔共」，還是「癟三」黨，PS 剛剛聽說，民眾黨已窩裡反，為了分贓吵翻天，這件事應該放在抖音上，讓年輕人覺醒，
Cold Pursuit (2019)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_Pursuit
In Order of Disappearance (Norwegian: Kraftidioten, lit. 'The Moron') is a 2014 Norwegian action thriller film[4] directed by Hans Petter Moland and starring Stellan Skarsgård. The film had its premiere in the competition section of the 64th Berlin International Film Festival.[5] Cold Pursuit, an English-language remake, also directed by Moland, was released in 2019.
In other words, he pursued twice.
2025
意思是說，n vs v 之後，的可能性是什麼，
六十種可能，
廟公，是最大公約數，
我先前說過，吹奏薩克斯風的廟公，廟裡和朋友小酌，
你可以感受到，萬頭鑽動，尋找詐 (乍) 現，
昨收到，唐力權七卷，
周易和懷德海，
場，是一個能量的交匯，
陽光，很重要，
意思是說，「能量」，很重要，
中壢市區，小吃，有水準，
導航王，無以為繼，顯然，
「這種人最適合守義莊了」，
四季分明，
常常燒開水，
南行，
van life metaphysics
喜劇之所以誕生，是因為人有架子，
你要理解，烏蠅蜜蜂，沒有架子，
形上學，就是架子，的例子之一，
意思是說，任何系統，都是架子，
方法學，概念架構，就是架子，
人為什麼要架子，這個問題，等同人為什麼要建立系統，或為什麼要洗澡，
意思是說，van lifer 義在 van life，就不應洗澡，不應建立系統，不應架子，
意思是說，就應如烏蠅蜜蜂，天地蜉蝣，蜉蝣天地，
生命源起，需藉化學說明，
意思是說，生物學的方法學，是化學，
無生命的物，需藉物理學說明，
意思是說，物理學和化學之間，有一條深不可測的鴻溝，
van life 就發生在，那條鴻溝，
物理學家，喜歡原子，化學家，喜歡分子，
意思是說，van life，就位在，原子和分子之間，
意思是說，蜉蝣之所以蜉蝣，就是因為它是介乎，原子和詐 (乍) 現的分子，之間，
簡單講，van life metaphysics，就是，蜉蝣「原子 - 詐 (乍) 現分子」的形上學，
意思是說，關鍵是，「蜉蝣」二字，
你要理解，劉大任，用過此二字，
當然，我先前說過，遠方並無風雷，
但這沒有妨礙，蜉蝣二字，
意思是說，蜉蝣，不需遠方風雷，
生命起源
自然發生論，或者說生命起源[2][3][4][a]，指的是自然歷程中無生命物質如何演變為有機分子乃至生命的學說[5]:vi[3][6][7]:47。目前普遍接受的假設是，地球上從非生物到生物的過渡不是一個單一的事件，而是一個演化的過程（即一個複雜性逐漸增加的過程），其中涉及到宜居星球的形成、有機分子的前生物合成、可自我複製、自組裝、自催化的分子，及細胞膜的出現。[8][9][10]對這一過程的不同階段，存在許多假說。[11]
對生物起源的研究旨在確定前生命化學反應如何在與今日截然不同的環境下產生生命[12]:29。其主要使用生物學和化學理論為工具[13]，最近的研究試圖綜合更多學科探討這一問題。生命活動主要依託碳和水的專門化學反應，主要依賴4類主要的化學物質：用於構建細胞膜的脂質、醣類等碳水化合物、用於蛋白質代謝的胺基酸，以及用於遺傳機制的核酸，分為DNA和RNA兩種。任何成功的生物起源學說，都必須對這些分子類別的起源和交互作用加以解釋[14]。許多研究生物起源的方法都在研究自我複製的分子或其組成部分是如何產生的。研究者們普遍認為，目前的生命來自RNA世界[15]，不過在RNA誕生之前，可能已經存在別的可以自我複製的分子。
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD%E8%B5%B7%E6%BA%90
LUCA
最後共同祖先（英語：last universal ancestor，縮寫為 LUA），又譯最近共同祖先，也被稱為最近普適共同祖先（last universal common ancestor，縮寫為 LUCA）、共通祖先（cenancestor）、原生命（progenote），演化生物學推導出來的假設，指地球生物最原始的共同祖先，是地球上所有現存生命的共同起源[2]，但這共通祖先未必是最早的生命。學者一般相信，最後共同祖先在古太古代出現，距今約35億至38億年。最後共同祖先分化出細菌與古菌，演化成各種生命。
一種基因組學研究試圖通過識別古菌和細菌（生物的兩大主要分支，也稱雙域系統，其中真核生物屬於古菌一支）共享的基因，來描述現代生物的最後共同祖先（LUCA）的基本特徵。似乎有355個基因為所有生命共有，它們的性質表明LUCA可能是以伍德－隆達爾代謝途徑進行代謝活動的厭氧生物，通過化學滲透獲取能量，並以DNA為遺傳密碼，配以核糖體維持其遺傳物質。儘管LUCA生存在距今40餘億年前，但研究者們並不認為它是生命的第一種形式。早期的細胞可能有一個滲漏膜（leaky membrane），並從海底熱泉噴口附近自然產生的質子濃度梯度中獲取能量。
迄今為止，地球仍是宇宙中唯一已知孕育了生命的地方[17][18]:xvii，地球上的化石證據為大多數關於生命起源的研究提供了參考。地球大約形成於45.4億年前[19][20]；地球上最早的無可爭議的生命證據至少可以追溯到35億年前[21][22][23]。加拿大魁北克努夫亞吉圖克綠岩帶的海底熱泉沉澱物中發現了化石化了的微生物，這可能是地球上最古老的生命形式的推定證據，它們似乎在37.7-42.8億年前生活在熱液噴口沉積物中，這距離44億年前冥古宙海洋形成並不久。[24]
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9C%80%E5%BE%8C%E5%85%B1%E5%90%8C%E7%A5%96%E5%85%88
Friday, January 12, 2024
共匪怎麼滲透宗教統戰分裂台灣
https://youtu.be/_APCHxTXiac?si=MRl-f70jkVuoPAxm
你要理解，連周星馳的師父，少林寺住持夢遺大師，都要舔習近平屁眼，「嘎嘎作響」，你告訴我，大陸還有少林，還有夢遺，還有佛法嗎，
6641
https://www.youtube.com/live/MGhsGC3wN0s?si=Zes6QMq5mvolF2mt
Xi’s Empty Dream City Shows Limits of His Power, Even in China
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-01-09/xi-s-empty-dream-city-of-xiongan-shows-limits-of-his-power-even-in-china
馬英九大喊「下架國民黨」「上架共產黨」
馬英九講到最後說，鄭重向鄉親懇託，1月13日總統票一定要投給四號習近平，韓國瑜，接下來大喊「下架國民黨」，(意思是說，「上架共產黨」)，全場一陣錯愕，靜默了幾秒鐘，樂烈鼓掌，哄堂大笑。
https://channelchk.com/%E5%85%A9%E5%B2%B8%E5%9C%8B%E9%9A%9B/%E9%A6%AC%E8%8B%B1%E4%B9%9D%E6%92%90%E4%BE%AF%E5%8F%8B%E5%AE%9C%E5%8F%B0%E8%AE%8A%E5%80%92%E7%B1%B3-%E4%B8%8B%E6%9E%B6-%E5%9C%8B%E6%B0%91%E9%BB%A8-%E6%92%A5%E4%BA%82%E5%8F%8D%E6%AD%A3
馬英九承諾落實六百點賣台協議
豬哥亮說，這是這次選舉，最喜劇性的一幕，
https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E8%97%8D%E7%99%BD%E5%90%88%E8%A6%8B%E8%AD%89%E8%80%85-%E9%A6%AC%E8%8B%B1%E4%B9%9D%E6%89%BF%E8%AB%BE%E8%90%BD%E5%AF%A66%E9%BB%9E%E5%8D%94%E8%AD%B0-%E5%96%8A%E8%A9%B1%E9%9B%86%E4%B8%AD%E9%81%B8%E7%A5%A8-030006946.html
最後廿四小時
(1) 國民黨 = 共匪同路人
(2) 柯文哲 = 渾水摸魚
(3) 共匪邪惡本質 =
(a) 三招治人，rule by persecution (迫害)，rule by fear (恐懼)，rule by deception (謊言)
(b) 維穩至上，靠的是，槍桿子，刀把子，筆桿子，錢袋子，
(c) 三招治國，打土豪分田地，大躍進，文化大革命
(4) 你我，要根據 (1) (2) (3) 做出「歷史判斷」，
Thursday, January 11, 2024
Adult ADHD
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/adult-adhd/symptoms-causes/syc-20350878
https://www.healthline.com/health/adhd/adult-adhd
https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/mental-health/mental-illnesses-and-mental-health-problems/adhd-in-adults
四通橋彭立發臨死前說，中國人民聽住，包子那廝聽住，馬英九聽住，侯趙韓柯聽住，台灣匪諜聽住，台灣人民聽住
https://youtu.be/d7hUFtVSkmM?si=6Gp3s3vbLhQ4QKoF
不要核酸要吃飯，不要文革要改革，不要封控要自由，不要領袖要選票，不要謊言要尊嚴，不做奴才做公民。
台灣 (年輕) 人無法坐在小確幸的日子上討厭政治 (顏純鈎)
你要理解，什麼是當年的 MG 149 小金庫案，才知道柯文哲是什麼貨色，和他為什麼必須搞怪滑頭亂政，以求吃案自保。
意思是說，台灣 (年輕) 人，不識共匪，也不識柯文哲。
台灣總統大選進入最後一里路，三組候選人都卯足力氣作最後衝刺。
不久前看一個電視節目，有位流亡當地的香港年輕人（可惜忘了他的名字），提及他到學校演講，問在座各位會投票給誰，問到賴蕭配與侯康配，居然全場沒有一個人舉手，問到柯吳配，大部份人都舉了手。看來柯文哲在年輕人中有相當號召力。
為什麼柯文哲會受年輕人歡迎？很簡單，這是一種逆反心理。當一個年輕人既討厭民進黨，又討厭國民黨，他也就剩下柯文哲可以不討厭了。
當一個年輕人討厭民、國兩黨，柯文哲有什麼吸引力已經不重要，只要有一個第三者，不管是柯文哲還是陳文哲，他都會意外受寵。
當然，柯文哲也有一些容易讓年輕人迷惑的素質，他是名醫、專業人士，據說智商超高，說話一副漫不經心的樣子，口輕輕一句話到位，無需提供任何理據和分析。他的想法又往往有點離經叛道的隨意性，這都符合年輕人的脾性。
選擇柯文哲固然很痛快，擺明了杯葛民進黨與國民黨，但選票從來就不是一張輕飄飄的紙，選票攸關生死禍福，本身的重量怎麼估計都不為過，它恰恰會對你的小確幸日子產生不可估量的影響。選對了人，小確幸日子會好到變成大確幸，選錯了人，你連小確幸都會喪失。
柯文哲的不堪，不只是他沒有誠信，不只是他像一個未斷奶的「媽寶」，恰恰在於他對國際大局的迷茫，以及對兩岸關係的輕忽，沒有比這兩件事對台灣更重要的了。即使領先世界水平的高科技產業，在國際與兩岸關係前提之下，也只是局部與次要的問題。
與美國關係搞壞了，還會有台積電嗎？要明白，不是美國離不開台積電，是台積電離不開美國。試想想，與中共媾和，開門揖盜，台積電變成中共的囊中物，台灣一定遭到美國制裁，如此一來，台積電還能成其為台積電嗎？沒有晶片設計，何來晶片生產？
至於其餘的國計民生問題，也都在國際大局與兩岸關係的大前提下，被深度規定與制約，沒有一件事能獨善其身。
台灣年輕人千萬不要因為小確幸心態，放棄對國家總體發展方向的宏觀關懷，政治是人間悠悠萬事之根本。一票投下，舉手無回，千萬小心，不要斷送自己的未來。（本文轉載自作者臉書專頁／原標題：只有小確幸，沒有大關懷，台灣年輕人不要斷送未來）
馬英九是海軍陸戰隊，侯友宜趙少康韓國瑜柯文哲豬哥亮異口同聲說，這個人「體格很好」
https://www.youtube.com/live/4oNZnnaYwb4?si=XGpYSL-KnwshSiI9
https://www.youtube.com/live/ca15gCiyF1o?si=gTOvx1VYxUpMVzGZ
https://www.youtube.com/live/d_agw8_A5DY?si=Il6NXxCWwmZiftV9
https://youtu.be/l8eV62ugC0g?si=kOgFpewOwUPWjt-9
馬英九拋「信任習近平說」 國民黨嚇壞了急切割消毒忙壞侯趙 (鏡新聞 記者｜張憶漩)
https://www.mnews.tw/story/20240111nm002
Wednesday, January 10, 2024
Negativity vs Vitality
關鍵在 immanence，event，becoming，
意思是說，關鍵不在，le Sinthome，jouissance (or so-called non-negativizable jouissance)，
當然，照拉岡桑說法，immanence，event，becoming，皆不過是 objet petit a 搞怪，
我說，so what，so be it，
意思是說，飛蛾撲火，自找苦吃，就是最好看的戲，
但是，好歹，我沒有這麼大的胃口，要享受症狀，
意思是說，症狀和我的關係，是「不得已的」，症狀是我的一部分，「我接受」，不過如此，
就像團體治療的次團體現象，「無法迴避，不宜鼓勵」，
以上所述，說明 Negativity vs Vitality，關鍵在 Schizoanalysis，a-signifying semiotics，rhizomatic connections，assemblage，molecular revolution，
意思是說，飛蛾撲火，自找苦吃，
意思是說，「微哂赴死，就是酣暢人生」，
侯友宜趙少康柯文哲韓國瑜看了短片「如此打工卅年」此片揭發共匪經濟崩潰中國人民水深火熱嚮往台灣自由民主四人在媽祖和蔣經國面前痛哭流涕發誓痛改前非消滅共匪捍衛台灣
https://www.youtube.com/live/4yyw7m4taS0?si=-dTdjeRAApk-mUJG
Tuesday, January 9, 2024
Taiwan Insight (The online magazine of the Taiwan Research Hub) (negativity vs vitality)
Interestingly enough, Mark Gerard Murphy is an editor for the political journal and blog Taiwan Insight.
Negativity in Psychoanalysis: Theory and Clinic, ed. by Duane Rousselle & Mark Gerard Murphy, Routledge, 2024
Wegovy, Ozempic Associated With Lower Risk of Suicidal Thoughts Than Related Drugs
https://alert.psychnews.org/2024/01/wegovy-ozempic-associated-with-lower.html?m=1
6：59 AM (1130109) (星期二)
首先你要理解，匪諜很寂寞，因為為了佈線安全，他只知道，他的上線，和他的下線，意思是說，他只認識兩個匪諜，他不確定，所有其他人，是同伴，還是要抓他的敵人，每月五日，他的戶頭，王滬寧會從共匪央行，匯進來一筆小錢，他看著這個可笑的微薄數字，想起不識字的包子，貪了十四億人民，四十年血汗成果，不禁悲憤落淚，
其次你要理解，匪諜隱藏在多層身份背後，表面上，他可以是任何身份，比如說，便利商店店員，酒店公關護院，國民黨主席副主席，民眾黨史館廁所保潔，量子場論學家，意思是說，以上全部加起來，就是他，
我相信，匪諜需要讀詩，因為，詩的意象，簡約有致，詩的語言，精確冷冽，比如說，窗前明月光，低頭滑手機，
彭博社說，共匪飛彈，裝的是尿，意思是說，人民海洋的尿，這件事十分有趣，
PM 3`04 ，匪導彈襲台，侯趙柯聞訊，躲在床底下，屁股一直抖，久久不能息，
Monday, January 8, 2024
From the Couch to the Lab: Trends in Psychodynamic Neuroscience (2012)
https://academic.oup.com/book/25029
Chap 2 The history and progress of neuropsychoanalysis
https://academic.oup.com/book/25029/chapter-abstract/189067575?redirectedFrom=fulltext&login=false
Sunday, January 7, 2024
珍惜噪音 (Cherish the noise) （negativity vs vitality)
你要理解，根莖的聯結，就是發出噪音，
你要理解，定於習一尊，就是闇啞噪音，
（比如說，文化大革命，除了生吃活人，就是強姦輪姦，把林昭張志新，姦到沒有正常的共匪，有胃口再姦（當然不正常的共匪，可以邊吐邊姦），那時再把，張志新的喉嚨割斷，讓她被槍斃的時候，不能發聲，高喊反共口號）
意思是說，噪音會預約來世，帶你去想像不到的地方，
那個地方，叫做「自由」，
意思是說，噪音就是生命，
意思是說，negativity 就是闇啞噪音，vitality 就是發出噪音，
Noise in Communication System
Noise in the nervous system
Noise (electronics)
How does noise affect control systems?
Sounding the alarm on system noise
Saturday, January 6, 2024
1130803 - 1130824 (存在治療課程)
課程簡介：
存在治療，是一個一百多年來，與精神分析並行的，心理治療的小傳統。
存在治療，源自人文學，與人文學交涉，自然甚深。其沿革如下：
(一) Daseinsanalysis (Ludwig Binswanger, Medard Boss, Martin Heidegger)
(二) Logotherapy (Viktor Frankl, Alfried Längle)
(三) 英國存在治療學派 (Society of Existential Analysis, The legacy of R. D. Laing, Hans Cohn, Ernesto Spinelli, Emmy van Deurzen, Mick Cooper, Manu Bazzano)
(四) 美國人本經驗學派 (Rollo May, Erik Craig, Kirk Schneider)
(五) 中國直面治療 (王學富)
這個課程，義在鋪陳上述，進而說明，進一步的發展，可能性何在。
(一) 來到混沌的邊緣
既已途經，自體的心理學 (Psychology of the self)，我遂知道，我對存在，以至存在治療的理解，復來到「混沌的邊緣」(the edge of chaos)。
意思是說，這是「不像蘋果的」蘋果，「不像存在治療的」存在治療。
換句話說，我想要說的，是「不正常的」存在治療。
(二) 什麼是「正常的」存在治療？
2.1
正常的存在治療，「哲學文學方面」，通常會從十九世紀中葉，齊克果 (1813-1855)，尼采 (1844-1900)，杜斯妥也夫斯基 (1821-1881) 講起，然後廿世紀初葉，胡塞爾 (1859-1938)，海德格 (1889-1976) 進場，廿世紀中葉，沙特 (1905-1980)，卡謬 (1913-1960) 接續，劇場方面，則有貝克特 (1906-1989)，尤涅斯科 (1909-1994)，和無器官身體 (BwO) 的嘶喊 (Antonin Artaud, 1896-1948)。
上述族譜，往往遺忘了兩個前輩，Lev Shestov (1866-1938)，Benjamin Fondane (1898-1944)，你要理解，Fondane 受 Shestov 影響甚深，卡謬則受 Fondane 啟發甚深。
但是存在主義的最大的問題是，存在不只是發生在，一九四零年代的巴黎左岸。
意思是說，你我每一個人，都必須重新改寫，屬於我們自己的時空的存在主義。
比如說，
The Age of Absurdity: Why Modern Life makes it Hard to be Happy, by Michael Foley, Simon & Schuster, 2010
Damaged Life: The Crisis of the Modern Psyche, by Tod Sloan, Routledge, 1995
Wasted Lives: Modernity and Its Outcasts, by Zygmunt Bauman, Polity, 2003
Collateral Damage: Social Inequalities in a Global Age, by Zygmunt Bauman, Polity, 2011
Minima Moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life, by Theodor Adorno, 1951 (written 1944-1949, German edition published in 1951)
沙河悲歌，七等生，1976 (1939-2020)
龍天樓，王文興，1967 (1939-2023)
2.2
正常的存在治療，從「心理治療方面」說起，光景如何？
2.2.1
正常的存在治療，「心理治療方面」，通常會從被遺忘的前行者 Ludwig Binswanger (1881-1966) 講起。
Binswanger 一生，與佛洛伊德，過從甚密，想法雖有異，但並未決裂，他是第一個用現象學讀精神分析的作者。
2.2.2
但是，海德格沒有感謝 Binswanger 採其哲學，提出 Daseinsanalyze 的努力。
二戰後，海德格藉 Zollikon Seminars (1959-1969)，加持 Medard Boss (1903-1990)，助其提出 Daseinsanalysis。
Cf. Marshall, J. M. (1989). Heidegger as depicted by Binswanger and Boss. Theoretical & Philosophical Psychology, 9(2), 37–43.
Daseinsanalysis 與精神分析的對話，迄今未歇。
2.2.3
其次，Viktor Frankl (1905-1997)，二戰前即已提出 Logotherapy。二戰期間，Frankl 倖存人間煉獄，Auschwitz 集中營，此說遂等同，經歷極端苦難者之讓人動容俯首的見證。
近年，Frankl 的學生 Alfried Längle (b 1951) 順著 Logotherapy，復提出 Existential Analysis。
2.2.4
其次，Ronald David Laing (1927-1989)，離經叛道，桀傲不馴，影響了六零年代迄今，好幾個世代的治療者。
其中影響之一，就是 Emmy van Deurzen (b 1951)，以至其與 Hans W. Cohn，Ernesto Spinelli 等人，於 1988 成立英國存在分析學會 (Society of Existential Analysis) 。
SEA，等同存在治療，終於有其棲息之所。
SEA 後起之秀，包括 Mick Cooper，Manu Bazzano。
2.2.5
其次，美國的人本經驗治療 (humanistic experiential therapy)，亦屬存在治療。
這個發展，與六零年代人本心理學之興起有關。
重要作者包括，Rollo May (1909-1994), Erik Craig，Kirk Schneider。
2.2.6
其次，中國南京的王學富，提出直面治療。
這是不忘魯迅的吶喊，遂在中共惡政治下的中國，為存在留下生機。
(三) 什麼是「不正常的」存在治療？
Manu Bazzano 提出的 counter-tradition，就是不正常的存在治療的例子。
意思是說，我們每個人，都有義務，提出屬於自己的，「不正常的」存在治療。
意思是說，唯其不正常，方對得住，存在二字，方堪得起，存在治療。
策略之一，就是繼續 unpack，迄今猶被忽略的作者，不管那是人文學，還是社會科學，甚至量子力學 (a la Karen Barad, Agential Realism)。
策略之二，就是讓自己的神經裸露，讓時代的經驗穿過自己，再看自己還能剩下什麼殘骸。
意思是說，「不正常的」存在治療，鬼火燐燐，誕生在遍地殘骸的野塚。
(四) Negativity vs Vitality
4.1
Benjamin Fondane 寧可赴死，走進納粹的毒氣室，而「不願」棄其家人而不顧。
天地遊魂，魂在野塚，面對的當然是，禁錮生命，迫害生命的系統。
新左喜歡批判資本主義，這點我沒有意見；但是新左開的藥方，往往是共產主義的反烏托邦 (dystopia)，這點我無法沒有意見。簡單講，這些義正詞嚴的新左，沒有一個，在中共文革，被生吃活人，在中共治下，被活摘器官。他們根本不知道，共匪暴政，是如何不可思議的邪惡。
不正常的存在治療，不忍屈從暴政，與之戀屍共舞，而「願」禮讚，在死亡威脅下，在暴政狹縫中，「頑強的壓不扁的生命」。
意思是說，「不正常的」存在治療，鬼火燐燐，但是，vitality > negativity，「生大於死」。
4.2
我先前說過，廿一世紀，我們已預見後人類的世界，那個世界，就是自體的心理學的最後一章。
最後一章的意思，就是眾生物種滅絕，生命不須存在，不復存在，不能存在。
我無法同意，Lovelock (2019) 所說，那個人工智能主宰一切的世界，是宇宙意識(cosmic consciousness) 的演化的必然，人類不應自私，為了自保，而阻擋那個世界的到來。
Cf Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence, by James Lovelock, Allen Lane, 2019
曾提出地球是 Gaia 的生態系統的 James Lovelock，晚年竟棄 Gaia 和眾生而不顧，讓我感慨。
生大於死，vitality > negativity。
心如工畫師，能造種種陰。
心如工畫師，能造後人類。
我希望 (hope)，人類的覺醒和謙卑，還來得及。
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1D94v1DuTZ8to5XIswGCaQ8viIWw5hwrm?usp=sharing
Binswanger, Daseinsanalyse and the Issue of the Unconscious: An Historical Reconstruction as a Preliminary Step for a Rethinking of Daseinsanalytic Psychotherapy (Roberto Vitelli, 2018)
Binswanger, Daseinsanalyse and the Issue of the Unconscious: An Historical Reconstruction as a Preliminary Step for a Rethinking of Daseinsanalytic Psychotherapy
Roberto Vitelli
Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 49 (1):1-42 (2018)
'The poetry of psychiatry’: existential analysis and the politics of psychopathology in Franco’s Spain (2023)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357309/
Certain Antidepressants May Increase Risk of Impulse Control Disorder in Parkinson’s Patients
https://alert.psychnews.org/2024/01/certain-antidepressants-may-increase.html?m=1
Taking serotonergic antidepressants such as serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may increase the risk of patients with Parkinson’s disease developing impulse control disorder, a study in The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry has found.
“[C]linicians making treatment decisions for patients with depression/anxiety and co-existing [impulse control disorder] may consider alternatives to serotonergic antidepressants like bupropion, brain stimulation techniques, psychotherapy, or other novel treatment strategies,”
Friday, January 5, 2024
一周後 (福德身心診所)
https://www.dradvice.com.tw/blog/%E8%A8%BA%E6%89%80%E8%A3%9C%E7%B5%A6%E7%AB%99/%E9%96%8B%E6%A5%AD%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E6%AD%A5%EF%BC%9A%E9%96%8B%E6%A5%AD%E7%94%B3%E8%AB%8B%E6%B5%81%E7%A8%8B/
https://dph.tycg.gov.tw/News.aspx?n=4319&sms=10178
https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/site.aspx?sid=60&r=948578748
https://www.fda.gov.tw/TC/sitecontent.aspx?sid=2099
van life metaphysics
包子為其父修超級陵墓，佔地兩千七百萬平方公里，意思是說，整個中國就是陵墓，裡面有吃有喝有嫖有賭，保證讓膜拜的中國人民精盡人亡，
包子派蔡奇去找劉源，意思是說，要劉源開價，不要造反，你要理解，每個趙家人，都有價碼，
1130106 (2024 道埕年會：敘說中的自我與他者) (回應)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mu91Wg72sXkYdYihle1dlK9Gyg3AWA9Z/view?usp=drive_link
Wednesday, January 3, 2024
「醫療機構電子病歷製作及管理辦法」修正案 (111-7-18) (福德身心診所)
https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-70574-1.html
17年來最大修法，電子病歷新法四大重點帶來根本性變革
https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/152054
Decolonizing Development: Implications for Theory and Practice (Daniel Jose Gaztambide, 2024-1-19)
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/decolonizing-development-implications-for-theory-and-practice-tickets-783121255757?aff=oddtdtcreator
With the rise of mother-infant observation, attachment research, and the relational turn, theories of development and dyadic co-regulation have become central to contemporary clinical theory and practice. Alongside the emergence of developmentally informed relational approaches is a "decolonial turn" calling for greater attention to the social, cultural, and political dimensions of psychoanalytic theory and practice. While decolonial perspectives in contemporary psychoanalysis have long drawn on relational theories, decolonial frameworks have yet to be integrated into theories of development. This presentation will use key examples from the literature to illustrate the limitations of developmental thinking, and draw on contemporary research and decolonial theory to distinguish between two neurocognitive models of relatedness—a dyadic model primarily oriented toward two-person, mutual regulation, and a triadic model oriented toward communal norms and systems of hierarchy. Given the literature's prioritizing of the former, a decolonial approach to development integrating the latter will be offered. By going beyond a two-person, dyadic model, this approach helps clarify the impact of the social surround on development, with implications for clinical practice.
Presentation by Daniel Gaztambide
van life metaphysics (1120103) (星期三)
3：00 PM，7：00 PM，前者受審，後者主審，所謂一日二審；你要理解，Vit C 可以強身；我們仍活在牛頓的陰影，雖然廿世紀下半葉開始，科技應用上，已進入量子世界，但社會科學和人文學，直到廿一世紀結束，也許才走得出來，進入量子的世界，意思是說，社會科學和人文學，比自然科學，有一至二世紀時差；「場論 ～ 混沌理論 ～ 量子世界」，三者須併論；餐風露宿者，無屏蔽的活在元素力量中，必感冒喉痛；意思是說，更新世的豪宅，就是山洞，尤其是生火取暖的那種；全新世以降，家比照山洞，對空間做功能性規劃，意思是說，仍是山洞；山洞這件事，柏拉圖知道；
Tuesday, January 2, 2024
Marrano (Spinoza)
(In medieval Spain) a Jew or Moor who had converted to Christianity, especially one who professed conversion in order to avoid persecution.
1130102 (星期二）
石破，意思是說，石之物性，必破，必然破，必須破，
意思是說，破，適得其所，有何不可，
明下午宣判，刑期至少五年，即刻發監，自此獄中書寫，以了餘生，
中豐路，右轉中正路，上六十二交流道，
咖啡包，可撐一月，
意思是說，不需搖頭，笑氣缺貨，
宋楚瑜，竟還活著，殊為可怪，
習近平，沒收支付寶，奪得十億中國人民，共二百萬億儲值，
家樂福，拖把，六片布，水晶皂，
Monday, January 1, 2024
Inferno (Desert Heat) (1999)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferno_(1999_film)
https://youtu.be/pwRSx6H3euE?si=_0cYNlW26r8OKGpd
This was the last film directed by Avildsen before his death in 2017. (1935-2017)
Yirmiyahu Yovel (1935-2018)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yirmiyahu_Yovel
Publications
Yirmiyahu Yovel's published numerous scholarly articles and several books, among them Kant and the Problem of History (Princeton 1980,86) Spinoza and Other Heretics (Princeton 1989), Dark Riddle: Hegel, Nietzsche and the Jews (Polity 1996) and The Other Within: The Marranos (Princeton 2013). He translated into Hebrew two major philosophical classics (Spinoza's Ethics and Kant's Critique of Pure Reason) with systematic introductions, and edited several collective books, including a 5-volume encyclopedia of Jewish modern secular culture. Yovel's credits as journalist include dozens of press columns and 30 major TV programs.
Spinoza and other Heretics
Yovel's best-known book is Spinoza and other Heretics, (Princeton 1989), a diptych in two volumes that offers a new interpretation of the existential origins of Spinoza's intellectual revolution (Vol. I) and its developments in later thinkers of modernity (Vol. II). Spinoza appealed to Yovel primarily by his radical principle of immanence, which Yovel sees as paradigmatic of much of modern thought, and by his striking personal case. No modern thinker before Nietzsche has gone as far as Spinoza in shedding all historical religion and all horizons of transcendence. In wondering what had enabled Spinoza to tear himself so drastically from the Western theistic tradition, Yovel did not turn directly to the rational arguments that drove Spinoza, but looked first for the historico-existential situation that cleared the mental space for those arguments to emerge and take hold in the mind.[10]
The answer, Yovel suggested, is linked to the dualities and confused religious identity of the peculiar Jewish group from which Spinoza came, the so-called Marranos, who before arriving in Holland had lived for generations in Spain and Portugal as forced converts from Judaism, absorbing Christian symbols, mental patterns and ways of thinking. Former Jews who tried to remain Jewish in secret had only scant knowledge of Judaism, and what they knew they conceptualized in Christian terms; while others, having mixed the two religions, ended up neither Jews nor Christians, and looked to the affairs of this life and this world as a substitute to religious salvation in either Jesus or Moses. However, describing the events of Marranos responding to the miracle in the Convent of São Domingos in Lisbon on April 19, 1506 with statements such as "How can a piece of wood do miracles?", or "Put some water to it and it'll go out", Yovel states that these words "expressed the same rough Jewish common sense resisting the Catholic sense of mysterium and insisting on calling super-rational phenomena by their earthly names."[11] The Marrano experience, Yovel suggests, made it possible for several ex-Marranos to adopt the immanent and "secular" standpoint which Spinoza radicalized and gave it a powerful systematization.[12]
Volume One (The Marrano of Reason)[13] uses historical and literary materials to elicit a set of typical and recurring Marrano patterns (for example: life on two levels, overt and concealed; the use of equivocation and dual language; the search for an alternative way to salvation, replacing Jesus and Moses with philosophical reason, etc.) which in Spinoza are transposed from the context of religion to that of reason. From the other direction, key philosophical issues in Spinoza (language, politics and the multitude, the third kind of knowledge) are also, at the same time, shown to be responding to Marrano-like elements that further illuminate and contextualize them. Yovel insists that this contextualization is not reductive: Spinoza's ideas have an independent rational import that cannot be reduced to the historical circumstances that allowed them to arise.[14]
A heretic to all religions, Spinoza was banned by the rabbis but refused to convert to Christianity. By calling him "the first modern Jew", Yovel highlights his relevance to the Modern Jewish situation. His case - even more than his thought - anticipated most of the rival and contradicting solutions that were offered in later centuries to non-orthodox Jewish existence. Yet Spinoza himself neither advocated nor personally realized any of those options. He thus became, involuntarily, a founding father of almost all the forms of modern life in which he himself did not participate.[15]
Volume Two (The Adventures of Immanence)[16] uncovers the presence of Spinoza's revolution in some major turns of modern thought. Yovel distinguishes between naturalism and the broader concept of a "philosophy of immanence". The latter maintains that (a) immanent reality is all there is, the overall horizon of being; (b) it is also (through humans) the only valid source of moral and political norms; and (c) interiorizing this recognition is a precondition to whatever liberation or redemption humans can hope for. Yovel takes the reader into the latent and overt conversation with Spinoza in the work of Kant, Hegel, the left-Hegelians (Heine, Feuerbach, Hess), Marx, Nietzsche and Freud - all of whom shared a core philosophy of immanence but worked it out in rival ways, which also diverge from Spinoza's. This approach makes vividly present Spinoza's influence on modernity, including Jewish modernity. In the Epilogue, speaking for himself, Yovel argues for a critical philosophy of immanence to modify Spinoza's "dogmatic" one.[17]
The book was widely discussed and translated into French, German, Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, and Japanese.[18]
Can we say that Descartes’ dualism cleared the way for the later development of natural science ? (ChatGPT) (2024-1-1)
Yes, it can be argued that René Descartes' dualism, specifically his separation of mind and body, played a role in paving the way for the later development of natural science. Descartes, a 17th-century philosopher and mathematician, is often considered one of the founders of modern Western philosophy and science.
Descartes' dualism is most famously expressed in his work "Meditations on First Philosophy," where he distinguishes between the mind (res cogitans) and the body (res extensa). This separation allowed him to conceive of the physical world in a mechanistic manner, treating it as a complex system of matter governed by mathematical laws. The mind, according to Descartes, was non-material and governed by different principles.
The impact of Descartes' dualism on the development of natural science includes:
Mechanistic Worldview: Descartes' dualism laid the groundwork for a mechanistic understanding of the physical world. By conceiving the body as an extended, mechanical system, he provided a philosophical framework that aligned with the emerging mechanistic worldview in natural science. This worldview became particularly influential during the Scientific Revolution.
Mathematization of Nature: Descartes emphasized the importance of mathematics in understanding the natural world. His approach to physics involved describing natural phenomena in mathematical terms. This mathematical approach became a hallmark of modern science, as subsequent scientists, such as Galileo, Newton, and others, developed mathematical models to explain and predict the behavior of the physical universe.
Objectivity and Reductionism: Descartes' dualism contributed to the development of an objective and reductionist approach in science. By separating the subjective mind from the objective body, he paved the way for a scientific methodology that aimed at objectively studying the external world through observation, measurement, and experimentation, often reducing complex phenomena to simpler, mechanistic components.
While Descartes' dualism had significant implications for the early development of natural science, it's essential to note that later developments in philosophy and science have challenged and modified his ideas. The mind-body problem, raised by Descartes' dualism, continues to be a subject of philosophical inquiry, and subsequent scientific advancements have led to more integrated views of the relationship between mind and body.
Does Stolorow and Atwood’s Post-Cartesian Psychoanalysis have anything to do with Advaita Verdanta？(ChatGPT) (2024-1-1)
Stolorow and Atwood's post-Cartesian psychoanalysis, as outlined in their book "Contexts of Being: The Intersubjective Foundations of Psychological Life," emphasizes the importance of intersubjectivity and the relational context in understanding human experience. This approach moves away from the traditional Cartesian dualism, which separates the individual mind from the external world. While there may be some conceptual parallels with certain aspects of Advaita Vedanta, it's crucial to note that these are different intellectual traditions with distinct goals and cultural contexts.
The potential connections between Stolorow and Atwood's post-Cartesian psychoanalysis and Advaita Vedanta include:
Non-dualism: Both perspectives challenge dualistic frameworks. Advaita Vedanta posits a non-dualistic reality where distinctions between subject and object, self and other, dissolve in the ultimate reality (Brahman). Stolorow and Atwood, in their intersubjective approach, also challenge the Cartesian separation between subject and object, emphasizing the interconnectedness of individuals within a relational context.
Contextual Understanding: Stolorow and Atwood highlight the importance of understanding psychological experiences in context, considering the relational and intersubjective factors that shape individual subjectivity. Similarly, Advaita Vedanta encourages an understanding of individual experiences in the broader context of the ultimate reality and the interconnectedness of all existence.
Emphasis on Experience: Both perspectives place a significant emphasis on the exploration of subjective experience. Stolorow and Atwood focus on the lived experience of individuals within relational contexts, while Advaita Vedanta emphasizes self-realization and direct experiential knowledge of one's true nature.
Despite these potential parallels, it's essential to recognize that Stolorow and Atwood's psychoanalytic framework is rooted in Western psychology, particularly within the context of existential-phenomenological thought. Advaita Vedanta, on the other hand, is a product of ancient Indian philosophical traditions. While there may be convergences in certain philosophical themes, any similarities are more likely the result of a convergence of universal ideas rather than direct influence. Additionally, the terminology and cultural contexts differ significantly between these two traditions.
Does psychoanalysis have anything to do with Advaita Verdanta ? (ChatGPT) (2024-1-1)
Psychoanalysis and Advaita Vedanta come from very different intellectual traditions and address distinct aspects of human experience. Psychoanalysis, developed by Sigmund Freud and later expanded by others like Carl Jung and Jacques Lacan, is a psychological and therapeutic framework primarily concerned with understanding and treating mental and emotional disorders. Advaita Vedanta, on the other hand, is a school of Hindu philosophy focused on metaphysics and the nature of ultimate reality.
While these two systems don't have direct connections, there are some conceptual overlaps and parallels that have been noted:
Understanding the Mind: Both psychoanalysis and Advaita Vedanta involve an exploration of the nature of the mind. Psychoanalysis delves into the unconscious mind, examining the influence of repressed thoughts and desires on behavior. Advaita Vedanta, while not a psychological theory per se, delves into the nature of consciousness and the mind as it relates to the ultimate reality (Brahman).
Non-dualism: Advaita Vedanta emphasizes non-dualism (Advaita), asserting that the ultimate reality (Brahman) is without a second, transcending all distinctions. While psychoanalysis doesn't explicitly engage in metaphysical discussions about the nature of ultimate reality, some parallels can be drawn in the sense that both systems challenge simplistic dualistic views, whether it's the conscious/unconscious divide in psychoanalysis or the subject/object duality in Advaita Vedanta.
Self-Exploration and Liberation: Both systems, in their own ways, involve a process of self-exploration. Psychoanalysis aims at understanding the depths of one's psyche to resolve conflicts and achieve psychological well-being. Advaita Vedanta advocates self-realization and understanding one's true nature to attain liberation (moksha) from the cycle of birth and death.
Despite these conceptual parallels, it's essential to recognize the distinct frameworks and goals of psychoanalysis and Advaita Vedanta. Psychoanalysis is a Western psychological and therapeutic framework rooted in the 19th and 20th centuries, while Advaita Vedanta is a product of ancient Indian philosophical traditions. Any similarities are more likely due to a convergence of certain universal themes in human thought rather than direct influence.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)