Monday, December 18, 2023
與系統的關係 (自體的心理學)
Sunday, December 17, 2023
有關第四世的數點說明 （第四世）(自體的心理學)
那天八庵我說，時間被壓縮了，
意思是說，原本一世卅年，結果，第三世三年餘，即已入第四世，
即已，恍若隔世，
Now，恍若隔世，就是，好像，上輩子，的事，
我相信，孟祥森離鹽寮，李叔同入虎跑寺，就是恍若隔世，
所作已辦，為而不有，
意思是說，空手，去鹽寮，步虎跑，入四世，
唯其「手空」，方得自由，
至於自由，並非孤懸，
意思是說，我在無待，迎面而來，四世他者，
意思是說，唯其「無待」，方得自由，
Beyond AI, What Are The Biggest IT Challenges For 2024?
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/beyond-ai-what-biggest-challenges-2024-bernard-marr-5qipe/
自摸西的一天
Saturday, December 16, 2023
Friday, December 15, 2023
Negativity vs Vitality
Thursday, December 14, 2023
自由 （自體的心理學）
有心的自由，必由抗爭而得，這件事比較單純，比如說，殺光共匪匪諜，你才自由，
無心的自由，必因絕望而致，這件事明顯弔詭，意思是說，你放棄自由，所以你自由，
意思是說，無憂無慮，財大氣粗，非自由，
意思是說，自由只能發生在困境，只能發生在流放，只能發生在囚房，
只能發生在壕溝，比如說，西線無戰事，
那個人，出神抬頭，聽著焦灼大地，久違的鳥鳴，被狙擊手一槍打爆頭，的瞬間，
毛姆人性枷鎖，Iris Murdoch 海海 （The Sea The Sea)，講的失去自由，是自討苦吃的那種，
也是最常見的那種，
這件事告訴我們，我們付不起自由 （cannot afford it)，我們寧可不自由，
換句話說，這就是，客體關係理論，和 Bernard Brandchaft 說的那種，寧可有互相折磨的客體，也勝過沒有客體的寂寥，
意思是說，客體關係理論，講的就是自虐，
講的就是，我們怎麼付不起自由，怎麼寧可不自由，
沙特，說過類似的話，
意思是說，沙特，「知」這件事，
佛家，頭也不回的，「行」這件事，
我說的是，弘一，
這是為什麼，程兆熊先生說，出家師父 （和宋明理學家）是大地豪傑，風雲的原因，
小結，
Is psychotherapy Proustian or Kafkaesque?
Is unfreedom Proustian or Kafkaesque?
Proustian 是主觀的不自由，
Kafkaesque 是客觀的不自由，
主觀的不自由，需要放下，
客觀的不自由，需要反抗，
最常見的故事是，沒有放下，也沒有反抗，
我們遂度過，操個半死發發牢騷就算一世，的正常人生，
直到你來到，第三世，
出神抬頭，聽著焦灼大地，久違的鳥鳴，
The Transparent Becoming of World: A crossing between process philosophy and quantum neurophilosophy (Gordon G. Globus, 2009) (QFT)
Three philosophers who emphasize process will be considered here: Whitehead, Heidegger and Bohm — but not in historical order. Bohm is taken up first. Bohm offers something new to ontology — “enfolded,” “implicated,” interpenetrated orders which are superpositions, as in a hologram. The process thought of Whitehead and Heidegger come into easier focus in the light of Bohm’s formulation.
Whitehead’s process philosophy is considered after Bohm’s and is seen to have significant overlaps. Whitehead connects his philosophy to physics more through the theory of relativity than quantum theory. (Quantum theory was in early development in Whitehead’s day.) Bohm’s physics is more in the spirit of Einstein than that of the Copenhagenists — Bohr, Heisenberg & company — which makes the interface with Whitehead more natural. Finally Heidegger will also be seen to engage in process philosophy, though displaced radically from the tradition of science and mathematics with which Bohm and Whitehead are closely identified. Heidegger calls his version of process das Ereignis and proposes a dynamics of great ontological power. Heidegger (CP) has a distinct antipathy toward science — he would “leave it to its mania for its own usefulness” (CP 198) — but as Pylkkö (1998) points out, Heidegger was not much acquainted with the revolution of quantum theory and so could not see its potential relevance to his thinking. Nor did Heidegger care about Dasein’s brain. (Chapter 3, Process philosophies, p. 49)
Bohm’s fundamental dynamic is called the “holomovement” (Bohm 1980, 1986, 1987. 1990; Bohm & Hiley 1993). The holomovement is “holonomic” (under the law of the whole). What “is” is holomovement, but “is” must be carefully reinter- preted: it lacks any connotation of Being, presence, perceivability, worldliness, indeed any distinction. The holomovement is pre-difference, pre-world, pre-space- time. We might only say of holomovement, in the manner of the Vedas, “Neti. Neti.” Not this, not that, not something else ... not even no-thing (which presumes an objectuality to negate). To counteract the overwhelming sense of Being implied by ‘is’ — a word that English does not allow us to avoid for long — it could be writ- ten ‘is-X’, using ‘is’ sous rature, as Derrida put it, “under erasure,” using the term and then crossing it out. (p. 50)
There are two primary phases of this holodynamics according to Bohm: implication and explication. Both phases are continuous and operate simultaneously rather than consecutively. Implication （翕）is the “enfolding” of world to the whole and explication （闢）is the cotemporaneous “unfolding” of world from the whole. Each moment of unfolding/enfolding has a brief duration. (On the “moment” see 5.7.) Bohm’s unfoldment is akin to Whitehead’s “creative advance” (3.3.2). It seems certain to us in living our quotidian lives that the world subsists autonomously (“the earth abides”) but Bohm steadfastly denies it. He thinks the world is continuously upheld in the movement of explication. The world is explicate order continually unfolded from implicate order, rather than explicate order persisting. Thus for Bohm the particle does not follow a continuous trajectory (seemingly implied by its visible trail in a Wilson cloud chamber) but the particle is unfolded from the whole at one instant and re-enfolded in the next, while simultaneous with this re- enfolding a particle is unfolded from the whole. The seeming continuity of world is accordingly an illusion according to Bohm. The world is instead continually and consecutively unfolded in the dynamics of the holomovement, a world hoisted1 in the dynamics. Bohm leaves no stasis; he presumes no subsistence in his thoroughly organic philosophy.
Bohm’s theory of the holomovement is a “double aspect” theory in the tradition of Spinoza. (p. 50)
In the universal flux of implication and explication,
mind and matter are not separate substances. Rather, they are different aspects of one whole and unbroken movement. (Bohm 1980, p.11, ital. added)
These different processes are at dynamical parity yet ontologically one aspect is primary and the other quite secondary. That is, implication and explication are dynamically cotemporaneous according to Bohm but the implicate order is more primary to the dynamics than the explicate. (p. 51)
David Bohm (1917-1992)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bohm
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12577912/
https://youtu.be/cysMpadecfU?si=CfrsfxirOnHP8VKY
His final work, the posthumously published The Undivided Universe: An Ontological Interpretation of Quantum Theory (1993), resulted from a decades-long collaboration with Basil Hiley.
Near the end of his life, Bohm began to experience a recurrence of the depression that he had suffered earlier in life. He was admitted to the Maudsley Hospital in South London on 10 May 1991. His condition worsened and it was decided that the only treatment that might help him was electroconvulsive therapy. Bohm's wife consulted psychiatrist David Shainberg, Bohm's longtime friend and collaborator, who agreed that electroconvulsive treatments were probably his only option. Bohm showed improvement from the treatments and was released on 29 August, but his depression returned and was treated with medication.[48]
Bohm died after suffering a heart attack in Hendon, London, on 27 October 1992, aged 74.[49]
The film Infinite Potential is based on Bohm's life and studies; it adopts the same name as the biography by F. David Peat.[50]
Publications
- 1951. Quantum Theory, New York: Prentice Hall. 1989 reprint, New York: Dover, ISBN 0-486-65969-0
- 1957. Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, 1961 Harper edition reprinted in 1980 by Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania Press, ISBN 0-8122-1002-6
- 1962. Quanta and Reality, A Symposium, with N. R. Hanson and Mary B. Hesse, from a BBC program published by the American Research Council
- 1965. The Special Theory of Relativity, New York: W.A. Benjamin.
- 1980. Wholeness and the Implicate Order, London: Routledge, ISBN 0-7100-0971-2, 1983 Ark paperback: ISBN 0-7448-0000-5, 2002 paperback: ISBN 0-415-28979-3
- 1985. Unfolding Meaning: A weekend of dialogue with David Bohm (Donald Factor, editor), Gloucestershire: Foundation House, ISBN 0-948325-00-3, 1987 Ark paperback: ISBN 0-7448-0064-1, 1996 Routledge paperback: ISBN 0-415-13638-5
- 1985. The Ending of Time, with Jiddu Krishnamurti, San Francisco: Harper, ISBN 0-06-064796-5.
- 1987. Science, Order, and Creativity, with F. David Peat. London: Routledge. 2nd ed. 2000. ISBN 0-415-17182-2.
- 1989. Meaning And Information, In: P. Pylkkänen (ed.): The Search for Meaning: The New Spirit in Science and Philosophy, Crucible, The Aquarian Press, 1989, ISBN 978-1-85274-061-0.
- 1991. Changing Consciousness: Exploring the Hidden Source of the Social, Political and Environmental Crises Facing our World(a dialogue of words and images), coauthor Mark Edwards, Harper San Francisco, ISBN 0-06-250072-4
- 1992. Thought as a System (transcript of seminar held in Ojai, California, from 30 November to 2 December 1990), London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-11980-4.
- 1993. The Undivided Universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory, with B.J. Hiley, London: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-12185-X (final work)
- 1996. On Dialogue. editor Lee Nichol. London: Routledge, hardcover: ISBN 0-415-14911-8, paperback: ISBN 0-415-14912-6, 2004 edition: ISBN 0-415-33641-4
- 1998. On Creativity, editor Lee Nichol. London: Routledge, hardcover: ISBN 0-415-17395-7, paperback: ISBN 0-415-17396-5, 2004 edition: ISBN 0-415-33640-6
- 1999. Limits of Thought: Discussions, with Jiddu Krishnamurti, London: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-19398-2.
- 1999. Bohm–Biederman Correspondence: Creativity and Science, with Charles Biederman. editor Paavo Pylkkänen. ISBN 0-415-16225-4.
- 2002. The Essential David Bohm. editor Lee Nichol. London: Routledge, ISBN 0-415-26174-0. preface by the Dalai Lama
- 2017. David Bohm: Causality and Chance, Letters to Three Women, editor Chris Talbot. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-55491-4.
- 2018. The Unity of Everything: A Conversation with David Bohm, with Nish Dubashia. Hamburg, Germany: Tredition, ISBN 978-3-7439-9299-3.
- 2020. David Bohm's Critique of Modern Physics, Letters to Jeffrey Bub, 1966–1969, Foreword by Jeffrey Bub, editor Chris Talbot. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-45536-1.
Charles Hartshorne （1897-2000）
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Hartshorne
Hartshorne is also noted for developing Alfred North Whitehead's process philosophy into process theology.
Process Philosophy (自體的心理學） （negativity vs vitality) (場論）
See also
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/process-philosophy/
https://study.com/academy/lesson/process-philosophy-overview-history.html
與歷程 (process) 相對的是結構 (structure)，比如說，Howard Bacal 說，特異性理論 (specificity theory) 是歷程理論，非結構理論，比如說，Melanie Klein 和 Heinz Kohut 講的，都是結構理論，
存有 (being) 是結構，生成 (becoming) 是歷程，前者死在家裡，後者客死他鄉，
前者是正常的治療，後者是不像治療的治療，
我不確定，後者應該如何收費，
船子和尚擺渡，一渡二文錢，
Gestalt psychology (場論）
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology
a theory of perception that was a rejection of basic principles of Wilhelm Wundt's and Edward Titchener's elementalist and structuralist psychology.[1][2][3]
Max Wertheimer (1880–1943), Kurt Koffka (1886–1941), and Wolfgang Köhler (1887–1967)
關鍵是看事情的觀點（perspective)，最好的情況是，能在好幾個，不同的觀點之間，反覆移動，來到一個，不易說清楚，但是已經超越了，原有的這些觀點的，各自的侷限的地方，
Kurt Lewin (1890-1947) （場論）
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_Lewin#Major_publications
Major publications
- Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
- Lewin, K., and Gertrude W. Lewin (Ed.) (1948). Resolving social conflicts: selected papers on group dynamics (1935–1946). New York: Harper and Brothers.
- Lewin, K., and Dorwin Cartwright (Ed.) (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.
- Lewin, K. (1997). Resolving social conflicts & Field theory in social science. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.
- Lewin, K., and Martin Gold (Ed.). (1999). The complete social scientist: a Kurt Lewin reader. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Lewin, K., (1980). Kurt Lewin Werkausgabe in German (Kurt Lewin Collected Works) Ed. Karl Friedrich Graumann, Stuttgart, Klett; 4 Issues, contains several works, which were published from the estate or never translated into english
- Lewin, K. (2009). Kurt Lewin Schriften zur angewandten Psychologie. Aufsätze, Vorträge, Rezensionen in German, Ed. Helmut E. Lück, Vienna, Verlag Wolfgang Krammer, ISBN 978-3-901811-46-3; contains several unpublished articles
In topological and vector psychology, field theory is a psychological theory that examines patterns of interaction between the individual and the total field, or environment. The concept first made its appearance in psychology with roots in the holistic perspective of Gestalt theories. It was developed by Kurt Lewin, a Gestalt psychologist, in the 1940s.
Lewin's field theory can be expressed by a formula: B = f(p,e), meaning that behavior (B) is a function of the person (p) and their cultural environment (e).[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_theory_(psychology)#History
柯文哲稱讚韓國瑜讀了很多書
Wednesday, December 13, 2023
Quantum chaos (場論）（QFT) (自體的心理學）
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chaos
The primary question that quantum chaos seeks to answer is: "What is the relationship between quantum mechanics and classical chaos?"
四行之三 (12/13/23) (星期三)
IBM Releases First-Ever 1,000-Qubit Quantum Chip
Tuesday, December 12, 2023
The New Wave of Therapy (場論）(QFT)
https://www.contemporarypsychotherapy.org/volume-5-issue-1-spring-2013/the-new-wave-of-therapy/
See also
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26904002
https://artomalley.com/presentations/psychotherapy-and-quantum-field-theory/
https://drjennifertyoung.com/2016/01/01/consciousness-quantum-physics-and-psychotherapy/
https://scienceofpsychotherapy.libsyn.com/quantum-physics-and-psychotherapy
https://www.thescienceofpsychotherapy.net/courses/quantum-and-effective-psychotherapy
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15048696/
https://drduiven.com/psychotherapy-and-quantum-entanglement/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042814024173
四行之二 (12/12/23) (星期二) (場論) （QFT)
Monday, December 11, 2023
non-substantial turn (Negativity vs Vitality)
Not substantial; without substance.
「非實體的轉向」，唐力權先生認為，這是廿世紀哲學，所發生的，最重要的轉折，
Intellectual historians have made much of the so called “linguistic turn” in contemporary philosophy. While its importance cannot be doubted, its true nature and status may still be debated. It is our conviction, however, that if one may speak of a depth structure in twentieth century thinking, the linguistic turn may yet remain a surface phenomenon. For lying deeper than the linguistic turn is the “Non-substantial Turn” – a far more pervasive and decisive movement that has constituted the one thread going through the various major strands of contemporary thinking: from relativity and quantum physics to holographic cosmology, from process philosophy to system theory, from deep ecology to green peace, from structuralism to deconstruction, from critical theory to gender studies, from existentialism to hermeneutics, and so on. （FIELD-BEING INTERPRETATION OF BUDDHIST PHILOSOPHY: Nine Essays on Its Relational Activity, by Albert Shansky, Xlibris, 2015, kindle location 241/1842)
但是，我想，東方人尚且做不到，西方人恐怕不會這麼容易，放棄「實體」（substance)，
你要理解，放棄實體，等同放棄個體性，放棄認同，放棄意志，放棄理性，尤其工具理性，
把自己交給，湍急的河流，去支離而復渾淪，
意思是說，把自己交給不確定性，而不至驚駭大叫，
你現在可以理解，為什麼 negativity vs vitality，這麼困難了罷，
意思是說，真正的 vitality，的前提是，真正的 negativity，
未知生，焉知死，是宦途儒生說的，
未知死，焉知生，是大地人物說的，
我說過很多次，中國兩千五百年來，
只有禪宗和尚，宋明理家，堪稱大地人物，
意思是說，其他都是，errand boys，收帳小弟，
四行之一 (12/11/23) (星期一)
Sunday, December 10, 2023
Peter Sloterdijk (b 1947)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Sloterdijk#Works_in_English_translation
Spheres
The trilogy Spheres is the philosopher's magnum opus. The first volume was published in 1998, the second in 1999, and the last in 2004.
Spheres deals with "spaces of coexistence", spaces commonly overlooked or taken for granted which conceal information crucial to developing an understanding of humanity. The exploration of these spheres begins with the basic difference between mammals and other animals: the biological and utopian comfort of the mother's womb, which humans try to recreate through science, ideology, and religion. From these microspheres (ontological relations such as fetus-placenta) to macrospheres (macro-uteri such as states), Sloterdijk analyzes spheres where humans try but fail to dwell and traces a connection between vital crises (e.g., emptiness and narcissistic detachment) and crises created when a sphere shatters.
Sloterdijk has said that the first paragraphs of Spheres are "the book that Heidegger should have written", a companion volume to Being and Time, namely, "Being and Space".[citation needed] He was referring to his initial exploration of the idea of Dasein, which is then taken further as Sloterdijk distances himself from Heidegger's positions.[10]
List of works
Works in English translation
- Critique of Cynical Reason, translation by Michael Eldred; foreword by Andreas Huyssen, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1988. ISBN 0-8166-1586-1
- Thinker on Stage: Nietzsche's Materialism, translation by Jamie Owen Daniel; foreword by Jochen Schulte-Sasse, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1989. ISBN 0-8166-1765-1
- Theory of the Post-War Periods: Observations on Franco-German relations since 1945, translation by Robert Payne; foreword by Klaus-Dieter Müller, Springer, 2008. ISBN 3-211-79913-3
- Terror from the Air, translation by Amy Patton, Los Angeles, Semiotext(e), 2009. ISBN 1-58435-072-5
- God's Zeal: The Battle of the Three Monotheisms, Polity Pr., 2009. ISBN 978-0-7456-4507-0
- Derrida, an Egyptian, Polity Pr., 2009. ISBN 0-7456-4639-5
- Rage and Time, translation by Mario Wenning, New York, Columbia University Press, 2010. ISBN 978-0-231-14522-0
- Neither Sun nor Death, translation by Steven Corcoran, Semiotext(e), 2011. ISBN 978-1-58435-091-0 – Sloterdijk answers questions posed by German writer Hans-Jürgen Heinrichs, commenting on such issues as technological mutation, development media, communication technologies, and his own intellectual itinerary.
- Bubbles: Spheres Volume I: Microspherology, translation by Wieland Hoban, Los Angeles, Semiotext(e), 2011. ISBN 1-58435-104-7
- The Art of Philosophy: Wisdom as a Practice, translation by Karen Margolis, New York, Columbia University Press, 2012. ISBN 978-0-231-15870-1
- You Must Change Your Life, translation by Wieland Hoban, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0-7456-4921-4
- In the World Interior of Capital: Towards a Philosophical Theory of Globalization, translation by Wieland Hoban, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2013. ISBN 978-0-7456-4769-2
- Nietzsche Apostle, (Semiotext(e)/Intervention Series), translation by Steve Corcoran, Los Angeles, Semiotext(e), 2013. ISBN 978-1-58435-099-6
- Globes: Spheres Volume II: Macrospherology, translation by Wieland Hoban, Los Angeles, Semiotext(e), 2014. ISBN 1-58435-160-8
- Foams: Spheres Volume III: Plural Spherology, translation by Wieland Hoban, Los Angeles, Semiotext(e), 2016. ISBN 1-58435-187-X
- Not Saved: Essays after Heidegger, translation by Ian Alexander Moore and Christopher Turner, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2016.
- "The Domestication of Human Beings and the Expansion of Solidarities", in J. Koltan (ed.) Solidarity and the Crisis of Trust, translated by Jeremy Gaines, Gdansk: European Solidarity Centre, 2016, pp. 79–93 (http://www.ecs.gda.pl/title,pid,1471.html).
- What Happened in the 20th Century?, translation by Christopher Turner, Cambridge, Polity Press, 2018.
- After God, translation by Ian Alexander Moore, Polity Press, 2020.
- Infinite Mobilization, translation by Sandra Berjan, Polity Press, 2020.
- Making the Heavens Speak: Religion as Poetry, Polity Press, 2022.
The 6 Most Important Web3, Blockchain And Cryptocurrency Trends In 2024
強迫症 vs 妄想症
Ha Jin (b 1956)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ha_Jin
Books
Poetry
Short story collections
| Novels
Biographies
Essays
|