These ponderings attempt to let themselves be appropriated by the event. (Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Martin Heidegger, 1936–38/1989)
Wednesday, November 30, 2022
發布中國示威消息遭死亡威脅 「李老師」:你們的言論管制創造了我 (2022-12-7)
Tuesday, November 29, 2022
漆黑将不再面对 (2022-11-30)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_VegCGzqr8&list=RDMM&start_radio=1&rv=Q_dMpQVoiw0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g3IQ2kuLtw&list=PLAA425CD7A42BABD9
intersubjectivity in practice (2022-11-30)
Monday, November 28, 2022
星期一 (1111128) (2022-11-30)
‘Wherever there is power, there is resistance...' (2022-11-30)
關於疏離 (alienation) (2023) (2022-11-30)
那裡是哪裡 (2023) (2022-11-30)
I’m surprised and glad that he noticed Karen Barad too.
但是,我對於 Shotter (2013) 就能來到「那裡」,還是十分驚訝,
什麼是「那裡」,那裡是哪裡,請看 2022-11-28 條目,
(二)
試著說明,
那裡就是,量子物理的世界,就是 Shotter (2013) 的章名,From inter-subjectivity, via inter-objectivity, to intra-objectivity: From a determinate world of separate things to an indeterminate world of inseparable flowing processes,
(三)
意思是說,
互為主體性理論,其實,仍然預設著主體的存在,雖然它也預設,一來自於二,being 來自於 intersubjectivity,
這不可謂不是,一個突破性的說法,對於慣於主客兩分的,笛卡爾的世界而言,
(四)
但是,你要想想,為什麼後結構主義之後,當代哲學,在講 new materialism,OOO (object oriented ontology),agential realism,
你要回想,懷德海當年講的歷程哲學 (process philosophy),就是受了量子物理的影響,
換句話說,一百年後,我們終於來到,一九二零年代,的世界,
(五)
我想,這是讓人疑惑,很難接受,的說法,
簡單講,這個說法說,主體,以至互為主體,其實皆為乍 (詐) 現,
互為主體性 (intersubjectivity),再往前推,究其竟,就是互為物體性 (interobjectivity),
這是為什麼,Graham Harman 講 OOO 的原因,
意思是說,「生命,無生命,皆為『物』(object)」,
你現在可以理解,照這個說法,再往前推,「人為之物 (man-made objects),當然『也是物』」,所以,我們會來到,biology-machine 結合為一體的,後人類的世界,
(六)
上述說法,為什麼讓人疑惑,很難接受,
因為,我們習於「人是萬物之靈」的說法已久,
(Human-centered) Humanism,就是 Anthropocene 的肇因,
Anthropocene,眼看著,就要毀滅一切生命,
意思是說,這些哲學家,講的「物的哲學」,尚容許生命存在,anthropocene 的結局,是一個沒有生命的物的世界,生命是不被容許存在的,
(七)
回到一開始,Shotter (2013),我驚訝的是,他超過了 interobjectivity,甚至已經來到了「intra-objectivity」,
什麼是,intra-objectivity,
我想,那裡是 Karen Barad (2007) 的世界,換句話說,就是後結構主義之後的,量子物理的世界,
我想,那裡是要說明,「物,乃至生命,的生成」,
你不要忘記,人類有了量子物理,才造得出原子彈,Barad 想出 Agential Realism,是有倫理的企圖的,
意思是說,那裡,除了說明,「物,乃至生命,的生成」,之外,
是要說明,物,乃至生命,如何免於互毀,如何互相珍惜,如何一起共存,
(八)
量子物理,讓人類一窺,宇宙生成的謎,
這個一窺,理應讓人敬畏,讓人自覺渺小,讓人終於學習平等待物,
但是,人類作為乍 (詐) 現的極其惡劣的例子,已有其極其人為造作的罪惡的旅途,
意思是說,乍 (詐) 現來自,波的功能的崩塌,而波的功能的崩塌,來自「無以名之的什麼」,看著,度量著,宇宙,
通常,我們稱那個「無以名之的什麼」,為神,
你認為,神會不會想,懲罰人類,
(九)
小結,
互為主體性理論強調,一,來自關係,
關係學派則進而強調,一,「只可能」來自關係,
Interobjectivity 說,一,本質上,就是物,
Intra-objectivity 則進而說明,一,作為物,的生成,和變化,
而,那個,生成,和變化,的關鍵,就是 mutual enactment,就是 resumption of the wave function,
意思是說,我想,關係學派還不知道,他們已經來到,量子物理的世界的門口,
diffraction (2023) (2022-11-30)
Sunday, November 27, 2022
習近平下台共產黨下台 (2022-11-30)
https://youtu.be/YZGBso_3s_o
https://youtu.be/Vzny8WrgFrY
https://youtu.be/-ilErk5QoZc
「路,是通的,他們不走」
Route 66 (1960-1964)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Route_66_(TV_series)
Route 66 is an American adventure crime drama[1] television series that premiered on CBS on October 7, 1960, and ran until March 20, 1964, for a total of 116 episodes. The series was created by Herbert B. Leonard and Stirling Silliphant, who were also responsible for the ABC drama Naked City, from which Route 66 was an indirect spin-off. Both series employed a format with elements of both traditional drama and anthology drama, but the difference was where the shows were set: Naked City was set in New York City, while Route 66 had its setting change from week to week, with each episode being shot on location.
Route 66 followed two young men traversing the United States in a Chevrolet Corvette convertible, and the events and consequences surrounding their journeys. Martin Milner starred as Tod Stiles, a recent college graduate with no future prospects because of circumstances beyond his control. He was originally joined on his travels by Buz Murdock (played by George Maharis), a friend and former employee of his father's, with the character leaving midway through the third season after contracting echovirus. Near the end of the third season, Tod met a recently discharged Vietnam veteran named Lincoln Case, played by Glenn Corbett, who decided to follow Tod on his travels and stayed with him until the final episode.
The Infernal Machine (2022)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Infernal_Machine_(2022_film)
Interestingly, this one was filmed in Portugal, which, well, what you know, happens to be my hometown.
心如工畫師,能造種種陰,
Saturday, November 26, 2022
The Man without Work: Jacques Martin
http://ica.usp.br/people/candidates/nikki-1
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/33028
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1343924
傅柯說,人生沒有作品全集 (oeuvre),就是狂人,
卅年前,知道這個命運之後,我就沒有回頭,
History of undiagnosed concussions may yield worse neurocognitive outcomes
Bipolar depression: a review of treatment options
Abstract
Bipolar depression (BD-D) is both common and incredibly challenging to treat. Even treated individuals with BD-D experience depression approximately 19% of the time, and subsyndromal depression an additional 18%. This stands in clear contrast to the approximately 10% of time spent in hypomania and 1% of time spent in mania. Despite this high illness burden, there remain relatively few treatment options approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for BD-D. Of the approved medications, four are second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and one is an SGA combined with an antidepressant. However, particularly when used long-term, antipsychotics can pose a significant risk of adverse effects, raising the clinical conundrum of weighing the risks associated with long-term antipsychotic use versus the risk of relapse when patients are off medications. Here, we review commonly used treatments for BD-D, including antipsychotics, classic mood stabilisers, electroconvulsive therapy and psychotherapy. We then address the somewhat controversial topic of antidepressant use in BD-D. Finally, we summarise emerging treatment options and highlight ongoing clinical trials. We hope this review will help compare the risks and benefits of several common and novel options for the treatment of patients with BD-D. In doing so, we also hope this review will aid the individualised selection of treatments based on each patient’s history and treatment goals.
Robert Castel (1933-2013) (2022-11-30) (2023)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Castel
- Le Psychanalysme, 1973
- L'Ordre psychiatrique, 1977 (Translated into English in 1988: The Regulation of Madness: The Origins of Incarceration in France)
Négritude (黑人性) (2022-11-30) (2023)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N%C3%A9gritude
Négritude (from French "Nègre" and "-itude" to denote a condition that can be translated as "Blackness") is a framework of critique and literary theory, developed mainly by francophone intellectuals, writers, and politicians of the African diasporaduring the 1930s, aimed at raising and cultivating "Black consciousness" across Africa and its diaspora. Négritude gathers writers such as sisters Paulette and Jeanne Nardal (known for having laid the theoretical basis of the movement),[1]Martinican poet Aimé Césaire, Abdoulaye Sadji, Léopold Sédar Senghor (the first President of Senegal), and Léon Damas of French Guiana. Négritude intellectuals disavowed colonialism, racism and Eurocentrism. They promoted African culture within a framework of persistent Franco-African ties.[2] The intellectuals employed Marxist political philosophy, in the Black radical tradition.[3] The writers drew heavily on a surrealist literary style, and some say they were also influenced somewhat by the Surrealist stylistics, and in their work often explored the experience of diasporic being, asserting ones' self and identity, and ideas of home, home-going and belonging.
Négritude inspired the birth of many movements across the Afro-Diasporic world, including Afro-Surrealism, Creolite in the Caribbean, and black is beautiful in the United States. Frantz Fanon often made reference to Négritude in his writing.
Karen Barad: What Is the Measure of Nothingness: Infinity, Virtuality, Justice (2012) (2023) (2022-11-30)
John Shotter obituary (1937-2016) (2022-11-30)
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/dec/29/john-shotter-obituary
John Shotter (2013) Chapter 3. From inter-subjectivity, via inter-objectivity, to intra-objectivity: From a determinate world of separate things to an indeterminate world of inseparable flowing processes. In Understanding the Self and Others: Explorations in intersubjectivity and interobjectivity, Edited by Gordon Sammut, Paul Daanen and Fathali M. Moghadda, Routledge, 2013
I’m surprised and glad that he noticed Karen Barad too.
但是,我對於 Shotter (2013) 就能來到「那裡」,還是十分驚訝,
什麼是「那裡」,那裡是哪裡,請看 2022-11-28 條目,
Interobjectivity (2022-11-30) (2023)
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_158
http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/63-INTEROBJECTS-GB.pdf
當互為主體性,欲求客觀的存在;當二,欲求三;
這時,我們來到,interobjectivity,
你可以把 interobjectivity 理解為,物的反撲,
Sounds like structuralism coming back.
意思是說,這個世界,本為一個物體的,客觀的存在,人的自大,添加進去,他的主觀,用他的主觀,凌駕那個客觀,企圖駕馭自然,操控自然,
無為,就是,道法自然,
如果,人,無法不為,
則,困難在,人「為」,是否必然造作,是否可能免於造作,
起碼,不是,太糟,的造作,
如果,人,有所為,有所不為,
則,困難在,為,與不為,的分際,怎麼判準,
依此,「The Moral Third」 (Benjamin, 2017) is an example of interobjectivity.
關於活著的數點說明 (2022-11-30)
星期六 (1111126)
Friday, November 25, 2022
關於互為主體性的實踐的可能性的想像七 (2022-11-24) (2022-11-30)
關於互為主體性的實踐的可能性的想像六 (2022-11-25) (2022-11-30)
關於互為主體性的實踐的可能性的想像五 (2022-11-25) (2022-11-30)
回到一開始 (2022-11-30)
關於互為主體性的實踐的可能性的想像四 (2022-11-25) (2022-11-30)
關於互為主體性的實踐的可能性的想像三 (2022-11-25) (2022-11-30)
關於互為主體性的實踐的可能性的想像二 (2022-11-25) (2022-11-30)
Guattari and Us (Ian Parker, 2021) (2022-11-30)
https://freeassociations.org.uk/FA_New/OJS/index.php/fa/article/view/401 (pdf accessible via archives)
Thursday, November 24, 2022
關於互為主體性的實踐的可能性的想像一 (2022-11-24) (2022-11-30)
The Poetry of the Word in Psychoanalysis: Selected Papers of Pere Folch Mateu (1919-2013)(2023-3-2) (2022-11-30)
Fentanyl Vaccine a Potential 'Game Changer' for Opioid Crisis
星期四 (2023) (1111124)
Session 13 (2022-11-30)
Wednesday, November 23, 2022
Session 12 (2022-11-23)
Tuesday, November 22, 2022
人己界線 (2022-11-23)
(一)
這是我的惡夢,
我相信,這點並沒有,那麼不尋常,
很多治療者,都有這個惡夢,
否則,他不會成為治療者,
(二)
這個惡夢的情節如下,
別人的事情,如果我不知道,那就罷了,
如果我知道,就會變成,我的事情,
(三)
比如說,一個病人,輾轉看過很多地方,
有一天,走進我的診間,
講了幾句話,匆匆離去,
不管,以前他看過多少治療者,
他的人生,就變成我的責任,
(四)
你現在可以理解,
這個惡夢,有多麼自虐,
和沾黏,
(五)
以前,我是這麼說的,
他去買樂透,有沒有中獎,是我的責任,
他結婚,是否幸福快樂,是我的責任,
簡單講,他的生,他的死,都是我的責任,
(六)
聽到這裡,你搖頭說,
你,實在,病得不輕,
(七)
我點起紙菸,看著窗外,
說道,沒錯,
我,實在,病得不輕,
(八)
Bion 說過,治療室裡,有兩個人,
病得比較輕,的那個,
我們稱之為,治療者,
(九)
意思是說,我的標準,極低,
我只要求自己,比另外那個人,病得輕一點,
(十)
那段泥濘的歲月,教了我什麼,
似乎,比較,正常了,
但我,仍然,漏個不停,仍然,心軟個不停,
(十一)
意思是說,我想,
這個惡夢,我是醒不過來了,
Reality vs Fantasy (2022-11-23)
Between reality and fantasy —- self psychology, middle school
More fantasy than reality —- Kleinian
More reality than fantasy —- ego psychology, attachment theory, relational psychoanalysis, intersubjectivity theory
Monday, November 21, 2022
The Causes of Teen Depression and How to Deal With It
共匪治國 (2023) (2022-11-23)
Is There a Doctor on the Plane? Tips for Providing In-Flight Assistance
李文龍和他的黑管的關係 (1111121)
Sunday, November 20, 2022
遼望著遠山
底比斯之約 (2023) (2022-11-23)
忘戴口罩取外賣與防疫人員爭吵 廣州女子慘遭「反綁跪下示眾」
How To Build A Positive Hybrid And Remote Working Culture In 2023
做一隻抬頭挺胸的鬼 (1111120) (2022-11-23)
結語和感謝 (2022-11-23)
結語和感謝 (2022-11-23)
1. 此番東行,始自一點五,
2. 本已預知,一點七,二點零,光景,
3. 殊知,續東而行,遂見到,三點零,
4. 這件事,有點意外,但又沒有那麼意外,
5. 因為,存在要求「抉擇」,批判要求「介入」,後結構主義要求「事件」,
6. 上述「三者」,遂成其為「自體的」,
7. 意思是說,「人的」,兩個復位,
8. 感謝諸君,相隨砥礪,遂得以行至此,
9. 意思是說,我們將在三點零的世界,的邊界告別,互告珍重,
關於「復位」的數點說明 (2022-11-23)
對於「復位」的數點說明 (2022-11-23)
1. 兩個復位,回到自然,回到歷史,
2. 從自體的心理學,存在治療,批判的心理治療,後結構主義的心理治療,述之,
3. 回到自然,比較簡單,只要寡欲,不喜洗澡即可,
4. 回到歷史,比較辛苦,甚至要命,才堪足以「回應」,屬於自己的歷史的命運的事件,
5. 意思是說,回到自然,減之又減,少即是多,越少越好,以至於無,
6. 回到歷史,亦須警惕,減少人為造作,但是最終,仍須「一舉」,
7. 意思是說,若非一舉,何來回應,
8. 意思是說,回到歷史,減之又減,但是最終,仍須「加法」,
9. 上述,「回應」,「一舉」,「加法」,與自體的心理學,存在治療,批判的心理治療,後結構主義的心理治療,何涉,
10. 你要理解,生命是有限的,人是有限的,有限的知,有限的能,
11. 但是,這個有限,沒有妨礙,他必須「抉擇」,必須「決定」,
12. 因為,他活在某個時空,見到屬於那個時空的歷史的命運的罪惡,他不忍不「抉擇」,不忍不「決定」,
13. 他不是神,他會誤判,他會犯錯,
14. 但是,這個誤判,這個犯錯,沒有妨礙,他仍必「抉擇」,仍須「決定」,
15. 上述說明,自體的心理學,存在治療,批判的心理治療,後結構主義的心理治療,皆須發生「事件」,才值得它的鹽,
Saturday, November 19, 2022
存在 (existence) (2022-11-23)
Existence is the ability of an entity to interact with reality.
In philosophy, it refers to the ontological property of being.
Etymology
在這個初冬預知那個盛夏 (2023)(2022-11-23)
Traditional One-Person Psychology (2014) (2022-11-23)
One person and two person psychologies and the method of psychoanalysis (1990) (2022-11-23)
The three faces of two‐person psychology development, ontology, and epistemology (1996) (2022-11-23)
A three-person perspective on transference (2010) (2022-11-23)
Who Is Dying from COVID Now, and Why
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/who-is-dying-from-covid-now-and-why/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=week-in-science&utm_content=link&utm_term=2022-11-18_featured-this-week&spMailingID=72339940&spUserID=MTEwMTQwMDYwODYS1&spJobID=2260457566&spReportId=MjI2MDQ1NzU2NgS2
南行 (1111119) (2022-11-23)
放棄 (1111119) (2022-11-23)
Friday, November 18, 2022
三人心理學 (2022-11-23)
底比斯之約 (2023) (2022-11-23)
大疫年代的底比斯之約
獻給喪生瘟疫的千千萬萬的人類,包括摯愛的志村桑
1. Jessica Benjamin,用 Winnicott 晚年提的,use of object,來講其互為主體性理論,
2. Object relating precedes object usage.
3. The third, especially the moral third, can only occur under the premise of object usage.
4. 回到瘟疫,
5. 武漢病毒 (aka,中共病毒,共匪病毒),起因於中共把 CRISPR-CAS9 的基因編輯技術,用於冠狀病毒,對之進行改造,所謂功能增強 (gain-of-function),以便人傳人,變成生物武器,製毒投毒,毀屍滅跡,湮滅證據,提前部署,以中國百姓,和全世界人類,為芻狗,2020 迄今的經過,你我都知道,不再贅述,
6. 你要理解,中共是一個極其邪惡的政權,最擅長的,就是指鹿為馬,
7. 然後,你居然沒有辦法,證明他顛倒是非,
8. 你只能被瘟疫肆虐,
9. 然後,用精神分析,的漂亮詞彙,說一番大道理,
10. 說明,人類,應該怎麼倖存,
11. 然後,對製毒投毒,毀滅人類,毀滅生命,的中共,
12. 精神分析,瞠目結舌,只能下跪磕頭,
13. 這真是操他媽的孬種,
14. 我要問 Jessica 的是,面對上述,妳的 moral third 在哪裡,
15. 然後,Jessica ,妳不認得 (recognize) 志村桑,
16. 我們一起來看,志村和優香,
星期五 (1111118) (2022-11-23)
Adverse Social Determinants of Health Associated With Self-Harm Among Youth
Thursday, November 17, 2022
降魔大法(1111117)(2022-11-23)
(一)
二零二三,一月中旬,
我與命運,有底比斯之約,
(二)
昨晚提到惡魔,
我相信,那就是 Bion 講的老虎,
你要理解,這個惡魔,就是我們每一個人,的自己,
惡魔的起因,有兩說,克萊茵學派,強調內因,自體心理學,和中間學派,強調外因,
這兩說,決定了,治療者的位置,
強調內因者,不會認為自己,就是原因之一,換句話說,即使反移情演出劇烈,治療者畢竟,是無辜的,清白的 (innocent),客觀的,
強調外因者,認為自己就是原因之一,或至少參與了重演當年,惡魔生成的過程,換句話說,治療者不是無辜的,治療者有罪 (guilty),雖然他可能不是,有意有罪,
無辜的治療者,晚上不會做惡夢,
有罪的治療者,晚上只能做惡夢,
這樣的惡夢,連做卅年後,我突然醒來,
(三)
我的疑問是,我的惡夢,對你有沒有意義,有沒有幫助,
(四)
答案是,沒有,沒有,
(五)
所以,我們回到,開始,
你有一個惡魔,在你的心裡,
你就是惡魔,
我面對你,
我知道,你有一個惡魔,在你的心裡,
你就是惡魔,
(六)
我想,我們該努力的,不是去除,這個惡魔,
而是,學習,怎麼跟,這個惡魔,共存,
一起活下去,
(七)
因為,你要理解,
我也有一個惡魔,在我的心裡,
我也是惡魔,
我不過也是惡魔,
(八)
意思是說,我們倆相遇,
就是,兩個惡魔,的相遇,
(九)
而,如果,我們倆的相遇,堪稱為治療,
那是因為,我對,我自己的那個惡魔,多了一點熟悉,
如此而已,
(十)
意思是說,我對,怎麼跟,我的那個惡魔,共存,一起活下去,
有一點,你可能可以參考,的心得,
(十一)
這樣的方式,理解治療,沒有打算根治,顯然不是究竟,
will to heal vs. will to truth,
Ferenczi vs. Freud,
自體心理學 / 中間學派 vs. 克萊茵學派
(十二)
你要理解,我是相信糊塗的,
我說過的,最清晰的命題是,
下雨天出門要帶傘,
(十三)
上述,提到共存,
共存的關鍵是原諒,
原諒自己,原諒他者,原諒這個世界,原諒命運,
(十四)
你要記得,智者說過,
原諒才能放下,
(十五)
當然,智者沒有說過,
原諒不了,你要怎麼辦,
(十六)
至此,你恍然大悟,
「互為主體的經驗,就是學習原諒的過程」,
(十七)
這是為什麼,治療者必須有罪的原因,
(十八)
恰恰是他的有罪,才滌清了這個世界,
(十九)
地藏經說,地獄不空,誓不成佛,
(二十)
治療者,你要覺悟,
這就是,你的命運,
這就是,你與命運的底比斯之約,
Wednesday, November 16, 2022
湯姆歷險記
星期三 (1111116) (2022-11-23)
Tuesday, November 15, 2022
Session 11 (2022-11-16)
Monday, November 14, 2022
New Treatise on the Uniqueness of Consciousness (新唯識論) (by Xiong Shili, translated by John Makeham, Yale University Press, 2015) (2022-11-16)
星期一 (1111114)
Sunday, November 13, 2022
object relating (plagued by distortion) —> object survival —> object usage —> object relating (free of distortion) (2022-11-16)
This sequence can be observed: (1) Subject relates to object. (2) Object is in process of being foundject instead of placed by the subject in the world. (3) Subject destroys object. (4) Object survives destruction. (5) Subject can use object. (Winnicott, 1971, p. 94)
情識作祟的客體關係,就是扭曲的關係(1),這是生命常態,如果在這場戲,演出過程中 (2)(3),客體可以倖存 (4),客體才可以被用 (5),那時,這個關係才可能,來到那個有名的 (6),「沒有情識作祟,如實的,免於扭曲的關係」,
但是,(4)(5)(6)是罕見的,人間這場戲,多半劇情,只有 (1)(2)(3),
菊次郎十六式舉例 (2022-11-16)
什麼是自體「的」心理學?(2022-11-16)
星期天 (1111113)
行動 vs 事件 (2022-11-16)
Saturday, November 12, 2022
Enactment (2022-11-16)
https://www.psychspace.com/psych/viewnews-11236.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enactment_(psychology)
In relational psychoanalysis, the term enactment is used to describe the non-reflecting playing out of a mental scenario, rather than verbally describing the associated thoughts and feelings.
The term enactment was first introduced by Theodore Jacobs (1986) to describe the re-actualization of unsymbolized and unconscious emotional experiences involved in the relationship between the patient and the therapist.[1] More precisely, Jacobs refers to the countertransference enactment, thus highlighting the implications of the personality characteristics, affective frame, representations and analyst's conflicts for the patient and the interactional behaviour.
In relational psychoanalysis, the concept of enactment is usually used to explain the re–experience of a role assumed during childhood, which is recited on the stage of the analyst's consulting room: the analyst is given a specific role to play; both the patient and the analyst lose in this context their sense of distance, interacting with each other verbally and non–verbally, leading to intra-psychic dynamics in the form of interactions within the therapeutic setting. According to relational theorists, though enactments are unconscious patterns of dyadic interactions to which both the analyst and the patient contribute, they are generally considered to be initiated by the latter. In the perspective of relational psychoanalysis, the central aspect of therapeutic change is given by the liberation of the patient and the analyst from the repetitive unconscious patterns due to the reflective awareness' acquisition of the relational interchange and the contribution of both parties.
Traumatized patients tend to bond with their therapists not so much through words as through enactments, expressing unconsciously—by the action—the dissociated aspects of the self and the object representation.
See also
https://dictionary.apa.org/enactment
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15294145.2022.2053190
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10481881309348760?journalCode=hpsd20
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0003065113496636
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9559350/
https://www.amazon.com/ENACTMENT-PSYCHOANALYSIS-Frenis-Zero-Press/dp/8897479197
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10481881309348762
A Conversation between Ted Jacobs and Wendy Olesker (2022) (2022-11-16)
星期六 (1111112)
CRISPR cancer trial success paves the way for personalized treatments
一點七之後 (2022-11-16)
Friday, November 11, 2022
主體本色 (2022-11-16)
星期五 (1111111)
關於香港電影史上曾發生的冥婚的考察 (2022-11-16)
互為主體性就是冥婚 (2022-11-11) (2022-11-16)
Thursday, November 10, 2022
荒蕪 (2022-11-16)
Wednesday, November 9, 2022
兩個邏輯 (2023) (2022-11-9)
主觀 vs 客觀 (2022-11-9)
Monday, November 7, 2022
Nāgārjuna (c. 150 – c. 250 CE(disputed)) (2023) (2022-11-9)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nagarjuna
Mūlamadhyamakakārikā[edit]
The Mūlamadhyamakakārikā is Nāgārjuna's best-known work. It is "not only a grand commentary on the Buddha's discourse to Kaccayana,[29] the only discourse cited by name, but also a detailed and careful analysis of most of the important discourses included in the Nikayas and the Agamas, especially those of the Atthakavagga of the Sutta-nipata.[30]
Utilizing the Buddha's theory of "dependent arising" (pratitya-samutpada), Nagarjuna demonstrated the futility of [...] metaphysical speculations. His method of dealing with such metaphysics is referred to as "middle way" (madhyama pratipad). It is the middle way that avoided the substantialism of the Sarvastivadins as well as the nominalism of the Sautrantikas
In the Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, "[A]ll experienced phenomena are empty (sunya). This did not mean that they are not experienced and, therefore, non-existent; only that they are devoid of a permanent and eternal substance (svabhava) because, like a dream, they are mere projections of human consciousness. Since these imaginary fictions are experienced, they are not mere names (prajnapti)."[31
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E9%BE%8D%E6%A8%B9#%E6%80%9D%E6%83%B3%E5%8F%8A%E8%B2%A2%E7%8D%BB
思想及貢獻[編輯]
龍樹菩薩是佛教中觀學說的開創者,以其初地菩薩的證量,並依大乘佛教般若諸經典為本,對大乘佛法的中道予以嚴謹的論証。龍樹菩薩於大乘佛法的中道定義為「非有亦非無,亦無非有無,此語亦不受,如是名中道。」[53]即不落有無兩邊,此不落亦不落,如此形容語也不受[54],是名為中道。並以此中道義及初地無生法忍的證量破斥諸外道的謬論。龍樹菩薩在佛法的歷史地位,世尊早已預記於《摩訶摩耶經》中:「…;佛涅槃後。…。六百歲已,九十六種諸外道等,邪見競興破滅佛法。有一比丘名曰馬鳴,善說法要降伏一切諸外道輩。七百歲已,有一比丘名曰龍樹,善說法要滅邪見幢,然正法炬。」[55]意謂繼馬鳴菩薩後約一百歲已,外道的邪見(斷見、常見、無因論等)乃未止息。故龍樹菩薩造《中論》[56]、《十二門論》、《大智度論》破斥邪見並弘揚世尊的第一義諦正法。龍樹菩薩的歷史地位,佛亦預記於《入楞伽經卷第九》中:「…大慧汝諦聽,有人持我法。於南大國中,有大德比丘;名龍樹菩薩,能破有無見。為人說我法,大乘無上法;證得歡喜地,往生安樂國。」[57]
龍樹菩薩的《中論》依「八不中道」滅諸戲論[58]。《中論》以觀蘊處界等一切法的「有、時、空、動」四個範疇,論証緣起沒有獨立、常住的自性,沒有自性就是(自)性空,並以此降伏諸外道的邪見。又龍樹菩薩大弟子提婆者,智慧明敏,機神警悟,欲摧邪見外道,乃請其扮外道,龍樹扮外道並力挺外道義,然提婆依龍樹所授佛法破斥外道謬理。七日之後,龍樹亦失其所立之外道義,遂允提婆擊法鼓,與外道論議,隨外道之所說,而予以析破,摧諸異道[59]。故摧伏外道、破斥邪見、作獅子吼、護持並弘傳世尊正法、紹繼佛種、續佛法脈、以初地菩薩的證量作法布施,造諸論,利益有情,此是龍樹菩薩在佛法的歷史上應有的定位。
龍樹菩薩造《中論》以觀五陰十八界法等法,以示緣起中道。例如以觀四諦而成立之緣起「性空」(沒有自體性)的真意,即是無常無我的因緣法,即是《中論》〈觀四諦品第二十四〉所言之「以有空義故,一切法得成,若無空義者,一切則不成。……,未曾有一法,不從因緣生,是故一切法,無不是空(義)者。」故依無生法而言,無生法與一切法乃非一非異之中道也[60]。
對漢傳佛教的影響[編輯]
就中國佛教史來看,最早引介龍樹思想的是鳩摩羅什[61]。羅什翻出了《中論》和青目釋、《十二門論》,及龍樹弟子提婆所作的《百論》,形成「關河之學」。因他在長安譯經、講經,吸收當時關河(長安)一帶的學者,如僧肇、僧叡等人。僧肇以駢文寫作《肇論》,批評六家七宗之偏失,闡釋龍樹的中觀之學。
鳩摩羅什還譯出龍樹所作的釋經論,分別是解釋般若經的《大智度論》和解釋十地經的《十住毗婆沙》。
後來,「關河之學」對學習三論之學的吉藏有深刻影響,他的《中觀論疏》常引關河舊說。往後興起的天台宗、華嚴宗、法相宗等亦或多或少受龍樹的影響。如天台宗智顗在其著作中援引大智度論和中論,華嚴宗法藏作十二門論註疏,法相宗承繼印度唯識學重新闡釋中觀空義,如玄奘著《會宗論》。
鳩摩羅什之後傳譯來的龍樹作品,有《六十頌如理論》(施護譯)、《七十空性論》(法尊譯)、《因緣心論頌》(失譯)、《菩提資糧論頌》(達磨笈多譯)、《一輸盧迦論》(般若流支譯)、《迴諍論》(毘目智仙共般若流支譯)、《勸誡王頌》(義淨譯)、《寶行王正論》(真諦譯)等。
在龍樹著作中,最常譯為華語的作品是《中論頌》和《龍樹菩薩勸誡王頌》。