Friday, August 9, 2024

Can we say that the later Heidegger philosophy was meant to say that being is appropriated by the event, which is Beyng? (ChatGPT, 2024-8-9) (存在治療)(1130803)

意思是說,人的小寫的存有 (作為一個小寫的事件),被宇宙的大寫的存有 (作為一個大寫的事件),事件,意思是說,本體論和宇宙論,在這個「被事件事件」的事件中,天人合一,

天人合一,意思是說,我來自宇宙塵埃,終歸宇宙塵埃,我就是宇宙塵埃,生命只是一場乍現,可以認真,不宜當真,

有趣的是,Beyng,這個大寫的存有,那個地方,無善無惡心之體,N = V,就是純粹力動  (Pure Vitality),就是無盡的燃燒,就是宇宙生成的能量,以至就是生大于死 (V > N), 

Yes, you can interpret the later Heidegger's philosophy as expressing the idea that Being (*Sein*) is appropriated by the event (*Ereignis*), which he sometimes refers to as "Beyng" (*Seyn*). This concept is central to his later thought, especially in works like *Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning)* (*Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis)*) and *The Event* (*Das Ereignis*).


### Key Concepts:


1. **Ereignis (The Event):**

   - *Ereignis* is a complex term in Heidegger's later philosophy, often translated as "the event" or "appropriation." It refers to the process or event in which Being comes into its own, revealing itself in a particular way. It's not a single occurrence but an ongoing process of unfolding and revealing.

   - Heidegger uses *Ereignis* to describe how Being is not a static presence but something that is continually "appropriated" or "enowned" through the event of its revelation. In this sense, Being is always in a state of becoming, deeply intertwined with the event that brings it into presence.


2. **Beyng (Seyn):**

   - In his later work, Heidegger uses the archaic spelling "Seyn" to distinguish his more primordial understanding of Being from the traditional metaphysical concept (*Sein*). *Beyng* is a deeper, more fundamental sense of Being, one that is not merely a static entity but something that is dynamically appropriated through *Ereignis*.

   - *Beyng* represents the unfolding and presencing of Being in its most authentic form, which is only fully realized through the event of *Ereignis*.


3. **Being and Appropriation:**

   - The idea that Being is "appropriated" by the event (*Ereignis*) reflects Heidegger's view that Being is not something that exists independently or statically. Instead, Being is something that is continuously revealed, concealed, and transformed through the event of appropriation.

   - This appropriation is not merely a happening but a fundamental process through which Being comes into its own. In this sense, *Ereignis* is both the event that reveals Being and the process by which Being becomes what it is—hence, Being is appropriated by the event.


### Conclusion:


Heidegger's later philosophy suggests that Being (*Sein*) is inextricably linked to the event (*Ereignis*), through which it is appropriated and revealed as *Beyng* (*Seyn*). This perspective marks a shift from his earlier focus on the question of Being in a more traditional metaphysical sense to a more dynamic, process-oriented understanding of how Being comes into presence through the event of appropriation. Thus, it is accurate to interpret the later Heidegger's thought as proposing that Being is appropriated by the event, understood as *Beyng*.