https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TuEoW-pvqnqshR-PikJ4D-2duIcTjUSf/view?usp=sharing
四百三十頁,十六萬字 (1120813)
These ponderings attempt to let themselves be appropriated by the event. (Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Martin Heidegger, 1936–38/1989)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1TuEoW-pvqnqshR-PikJ4D-2duIcTjUSf/view?usp=sharing
四百三十頁,十六萬字 (1120813)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17093541/
https://www.museumofdreams.org/treating-psychosis-in-quebec
https://www.gifric.com/388.htm
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nXnu51Pzt-azOuxnYdEdhgDL5Q11xJHd/view?usp=drivesdk
Savoir
Gifric uses the word savoir to describe the singular knowledge that comes out of the experience of the clinic. At one level, savoir is a knowl- edge that is utterly particular to the subject, irreducible to the level of in- formation, concerning the particularities of the subject’s relation to jouissance. The savoir at the end of analysis refers itself to fantasy and concerns the cause of the failing of jouissance. Savoir may therefore be considered necessary to assuming the risks of one’s desire and hence at the heart of a psychoanalytic ethics.There are other levels of savoir that serve to inform clinical praxis.
https://www.verywellmind.com/zeigarnik-effect-memory-overview-4175150
See also
https://www.simplypsychology.org/zeigarnik-effect.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeigarnik_effect
Now, this must have something to do with objet a.
羅剎海市,共匪下架,顯然匪蠢,終於搞懂,誰是馬戶,誰是又鳥;你要理解,理應緩慢 (a la Kundera);意思是說,無鳥好急;逐漸清晰,「五性論惡,遂為架構」;Roberto Bolano,1234;Paul Auster,4321;我說,0123;因為三蘊涵四,遂無四可言;想起石頭在貴州荒山,蚊子應該很多;
這豈不就是,Lisa Fittko 帶著 Walter Benjamin 一行,走過的那個死亡之旅,
意思是說,十三飛姐,跟阿旺說,香港遍地黃金,但黃金下的屍骸,是沒有人看見的,
意思是說,走在屍骸上,無知無覺,就是正確的旅行方法,
走在屍骸上,寸步難行,就是不像旅行的旅行,就是不像蘋果的蘋果,
Psychoanalysis . . . as anti-psychology?
Understood in this way, psychology (which, importantly, is inclusive of the psychotherapeutic) is naïvely positivistic (a misguided form of scientism). It fails to engage the Otherness that lies at the heart of subjectivity; it falls prey to the illusion that the human subject can be approached as a consistent, self-enclosed identity. Psychology, moreover, is necessarily tied to the objectives of a type of disciplinary normalization whereby – staying with Foucault – subjects must be assimilated into the contemporary judgements and values of society. A three-fold attack on the various forms of psychology’s alleged reductionism (the respective reductionisms of behaviourism, cognitivism, and latterly, of neuroscience) is thus extended by means of a political critique which considers ‘psychologism’ a ‘blatant ideological program’ (p. 30).
C.G.: Isn’t one of the most important aspects of the Lacanian enterprise the fact that it stands in the way of any and all psychologization of the subject?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0C9KCKKVQ/ref=pe_2313360_740221910_em_1p_0_lm
A polemical book to set the record straight.
Over forty years after the death of Jacques Lacan, the ‘dark legend’ continues to circulate in common perception – Lacan the tyrant, Lacan the unscrupulous, Lacan the rapacious, Lacan the doolally.
The sole biography published to date on the greatest French psychoanalyst proffers a sounding board for this dark legend, and does so under the cover of objectivity. Overlooking how one cannot become the historian of one’s own history, allowing herself to be overtaken by her negative transference, turning a blind eye to what Lacan said about himself and to the practice to which he was devoted, Elisabeth Roudinesco allows both the man and his teaching to slip through her fingers. And not without departing from the very rules of historical method that she claims to espouse.
Nathalie Jaudel lays out her reply and paints a portrait of Lacan that sets its compass by Roland Barthes’ remark that a biographer should strive to be at once ‘amicable and jaunty’.
Nathalie Jaudel, a graduate of Sciences-Po Paris and a former lawyer, is a psychoanalyst based in Paris. She is a member of the École de la Cause freudienne and the World Association of Psychoanalysis.
The Modern Subject: Conceptions of the Self in Classical German Philosophy (1995)
The Self-Emptying Subject: Kenosis and Immanence, Medieval to Modern (2018) (accessible via Scribd)
你要理解,每個時代,每個文明,每個文化,每個地區,每個縣市,每條街,對於人是什麼,有不同的理解,不同的判準,不同的鑑賞,
https://uva.theopenscholar.com/neh-institute/leonardo-da-vinci-art-anatomy-and-humanism
這是達文西 (注意,是達文西,不是文西),五百三十年前,心目中,健康的人,的長相,
你要理解,我講的自體的心理學,的自體,是廿一世紀的人,
當然,從文藝復興,到我們今天,這個破壞殆盡的廢墟,其間,我們經過了現代 (modernity) ,
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1OBNQW_dFBx7JQsnKq4LCwHd44p8q8qA2
意思是說,現代人長相,尚稱體面,我心目中,廿一世紀的人,長得越來越像廢墟,
https://alert.psychnews.org/2023/08/fda-approves-first-oral-medication-for.html
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday approved Zurzuvae (zuranolone), the first oral medication for the treatment of postpartum depression in adults. Zuranolone acts on similar receptors in the brain as the intravenous medication brexanolone, which was the first postpartum depression medication to receive FDA approval in 2019.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2014-01139-001
See also
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1015-60462010000200001
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1015-60462010000200002
http://www.iea.usp.br/midiateca/apresentacao/o-arquivo-apartheid-soon/at_download/file
https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.1177/0081246314533636
https://www.communityidentity.com.au/portfolio/the-apartheid-archives-project/
在2023年柏林影展中,杜琪峯獲邀擔任主競賽評審,而於記者會上,一名記者詢問了以下問題:
...and if you can give us a statement why cinema is so important for us, sitting in a dark room with our audience watching a movie on a big screen? Maybe from your own words, what makes cinema so special that Cinema will never die? Thank you.
——2023年柏林影展國際評審記者會
其中文翻譯為:
...請問您能告訴我們,為什麼電影對我們如此重要,讓我們的觀眾坐在黑暗的房間裡,觀看著大銀幕上的電影? 也許用你自己的話來說,是什麼讓電影如此特別,以至於電影永不消亡? 謝謝。
——2023年柏林影展國際評審記者會
而杜琪峯則以粵語回應:
電影永遠在前鋒位置,如果有極權時,人民失去自由時,電影通常首當其衝,好多地方都會係咁,一定係停咗你嘅文化。電影文化係直接入觀眾入面,所以獨裁者通常對付嘅,一定係電影。我覺得香港......No, sorry...... 我覺得全球爭取自由嘅國家同人民,都要支持電影,因為佢會代你發聲。
——杜琪峯,2023年柏林影展國際評審記者會
翻譯作書面語為:
電影永遠在前鋒位置,如果有極權時,人民失去自由時,電影通常首當其衝,很多地方都會這樣,(極權政府)一定先移除當地的文化。電影文化是直接進入觀眾內心的,所以獨裁者通常對付的,一定是電影。我覺得香港...不,抱歉,我覺得全球爭取自由的國家和人民,都要支持電影,因為它(電影)會代你發聲。
——杜琪峯,2023年柏林影展國際評審記者會
該番言論有指影射中國政府為獨裁政府,引起內地民眾熱議,甚至疑似引起內地官方關注,騰訊網等一眾媒體甚至推斷杜琪峯距離被內地官方封殺不遠。而在新浪微博上,有關杜琪峯的粉絲帳號遭到封鎖。[11]
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E6%9D%9C%E7%90%AA%E5%B3%AF#%E9%9B%BB%E5%BD%B1%E4%BD%9C%E5%93%81
首先你要理解,羅馬不是一天造成的,意思是說,豬哥亮不是一天造成的,
豬哥亮從青春期開始,就發願要在牛肉場,闖一片天空,
這是多麼偉大的心願,你可以理解嗎,
這件事說明,發願是一切的開始,比如說,發願滅共,
昨天我說,余茂春說,中共不是中國人,
意思是說,反共,不是反中國人,是幫助中國人,一起滅共,
所謂,「頂住黑暗的閘門,讓孩子們可以在陽光下嬉戲」,
所以,豬哥亮發願,「頂住牛肉場的閘門,讓漂泊的下半身,可以有一個愉悅的晚間時刻」,
四十年前的西門町,簡直就是人間天堂,
神蹟一般的人間天堂,
然後,豬哥亮,
「毫無疑問」(no doubt at all),就是,
那個,天堂,的主 (住)持,
看書的樂趣,在於,像看電影,前三十秒,甚至前三秒,你就被畫面和音樂,震懾住,以致往下,多看了幾分鐘,以致又多看幾分鐘,以致看完,以致不多久,又重新看一遍,幾年後,又重新看第二遍,幾十年後,仍在重新看,
意思是說,好看的書,要酣暢,以至於,不能 (忍)釋手,
有的書,是有意圖的,作者十分明確,他在做什麼,這種書,看書名,你就知道,他想做什麼,以致你搖頭放下,沒有打開封首,
有的書,作者有點糊塗,他其實不知道,他想做什麼,你看到他,東摸摸西摸摸,摸不出個鳥,你有點為他著急,你甚至想奪筆,幫他寫算了,
但是,你上當了,他就是要你,這樣反應,意思是說,你已經進入了,他的世界,
有的書,作者很狡猾,留下很多伏筆,像是糖果屋,留下麵包屑,石頭,幫克蘭蒂和班吉爾,找到回家的路,
這種書,的樂趣,在於,你找得到,那些伏筆,你遂以為,你讀懂了,
以上,講了半天,其實,我是要說,好看的書,開門見山,開門不見山,開門復見山,
你要理解,卅年前,淡水老街,沿著淡水河,一排蒼天古榕,
曾經,有一家餐廳「河堤」,離河三尺,鐵軌枕木,上無片瓦,
你坐在那裡吃飯,你抬頭,遂見觀音,
有點像,平劇京戲,不見馬,亦不見槍,
卻,「馬來,槍來,來來來」,
這是,黃秋生,的戲,
不信,你去問他,
小結,好看的書,沒有客套,沒有虛情,沒有假意,之所以好看,是因為它要激怒你,它要你大笑,它要你大哭,它要你哭笑不得,它要你看見另一個世界的可能,意思是說,作者 (曾經)在另一個世界,等著他的讀者,但是,你要理解,他沒有等太久,他已經離開那另一個世界,又去了另另一個世界,意思是說,這樣的作者,才是有趣的作者,而那個悵然若失的讀者,才是有心的讀者,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dylan_Evans
Evans was a psychoanalyst in the style of Jacques Lacan, and wrote a standard reference work in the field. After several years, however, Evans eventually came to doubt the logical and scientific validity of Lacanianism, and ultimately abandoned the field because he was worried Lacanianism harmed rather than helped patients.[4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Zagajewski
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2001/09/24/try-to-praise-the-mutilated-world
https://youtu.be/yWDupI_APr0
中國人,和台灣人,你們要理解,1958 - 1961,大躍進的時候,共匪將大量食物援外,不願養活中國人,且解放軍封鎖村口,不許易子而食的村民,外出覓食求救,意思是說,要大家各自餓死,在各自家裡,不讓真相,大白於世,與此同時,毛澤東每天,吃肥豬肉,和女護士,女車掌,打情罵俏,然後拼命打炮,負責替毛擦屁股的周恩來,收到各地上傳,死亡人數清單,無動於衷,把八千萬個,已經餓死的中國人名單,丟進垃圾桶,跟鄧穎超說,等一下晚餐,我們吃三分熟帶血牛排,