https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Young_(academic)
Psychoanalysis, Science and Power
Essays in Honour of Robert Maxwell Young
https://freeassociations.org.uk/FA_New/OJS/index.php/fa/article/view/365
These ponderings attempt to let themselves be appropriated by the event. (Beiträge zur Philosophie (Vom Ereignis), Martin Heidegger, 1936–38/1989)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Young_(academic)
https://freeassociations.org.uk/FA_New/OJS/index.php/fa/article/view/365
喝「水」,家樂福,狗老闆,一條菸,藉此課程,整理回憶,意思是說,把回憶,放進整理箱 (container),你要理解,眼不見為「淨」,港媒放「假」風,說剛開的政治局會議,已將兩個確立,寫進黨章,Bion 說過,哪裡有砲火,就往哪裡去,這句話是,一戰期間,他「窩」在坦克車的鐵棺材裡,「悟」出來的,黃宗羲說,在我身下,置一青石板,意思是說,不要棺材,只要「速」朽,你要理解,殭屍是住在棺材裡的,尤其是那種,不朽的棺材,兩個維護是指,維護共產黨糟蹋中國人,維護包子是黨中央的核心,帶領共產黨糟蹋中國人,簡單講,維護黨中央權威和集中統一領導,一六年十二月,包子在中央政治局民主就是屁生活會上,一如往常,用錯別字唸稿,「黨中央的核心,全黨的核心,對我來說,就是操他媽的權力的權力,我要用畢生精力和全部生命來惡搞中國人民,和全世界人類,鞠躬盡瘁、赴湯蹈火、每日七炮,精盡人亡,萬死不辭」,兩個確立就是兩個維護,確立包子是「核心中的核心」,「精蟲中的精蟲」,「邪惡中的邪惡」,「惡搞中的惡搞」,意思是說,包秦三世暴政,就是中國人永遠的輪迴,醒不來的惡夢,還差一條菸,陣雨,
一是怎麼找到文本,二是找到之後,怎麼處理,三是思索,我們和文本的,存在上的關係,這三件事,待 9/14 再做說明,意思是說,解決了這三件事,你就可以,點起紙菸,看著窗外的天空,或蔚藍的大海,意思是說,你就可以,重獲自由,你要理解,自由是「他媽的」多麼可貴,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sh%C5%ABsaku_End%C5%8D
https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Shusaku-Endo/dp/081121320X/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2QENWMVU2EL13&keywords=Deep+river.+Shusaku+endo&qid=1662810162&s=books&sprefix=deep+river.+shusaku+endo%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C330&sr=1-1 (Deep River, 1995) (accessible via Scribd documents)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Groddeck
In 1923 he published Das Buch vom Es, an unusual work in which each chapter is in the form of a letter to a girlfriend addressed as "my dear“,
In his introduction to the 1949 English version[6] of Groddeck's Das Buch vom Es (1923),[7] Lawrence Durrell comments that Groddeck is often mistaken for an orthodox disciple of Sigmund Freud. He goes on to say "Groddeck was the only analyst whose views had some effect on Freud", and "while he accepts and employs much of the heavy equipment of the master, he is separated forever from Freud by an entirely different conception of the constitution and functioning of the human psyche."[8]
Freud mentions Groddeck in The Ego and the Id,[9] crediting him with giving a name to what Freud had already given a local habitation, to wit, the Id.
Now I think we shall gain a great deal by following the suggestion of a writer who, from personal motives, vainly asserts that he has nothing to do with the rigours of pure science. I am speaking of Georg Groddeck, who is never tired of insisting that what we call our ego behaves essentially passively in life, and that, as he expresses it, we are "lived" by unknown and uncontrollable forces. We have all had impressions of the same kind, even though they may not have overwhelmed us to the exclusion of all others, and we need feel no hesitation in finding a place for Groddeck's discovery in the structure of science. I propose to take it into account by calling the entity which starts out from the system Pcpt. and begins by being Pcs. the "ego", and by following Groddeck in calling the other part of the mind, into which this entity extends and which behaves as though it were Ucs., the "id". (Freud 1927/1961, 13).
Groddeck eventually had acrimonious disagreement with Freud about the definition and limitations of the It/Id/das Es.[10][a]Groddeck regarded the ego as an extension or a mask for the id, whereas Freud regarded them as separate constructs.[11]
In contrast to Freud, Groddeck was primarily engaged with the treatment of chronically ill patients. Groddeck is considered by many as a founder of psychosomatic medicine – his reservations against strict science and orthodox medicine made him an outsider among psychoanalysts till today.[12]
Groddeck was a controversial but important figure within the psychoanalytic movement. He attended the congress of the German psychoanalytic association in 1930. He was invited to lecture to the British Psychoanalytic Society in 1928, and invited by Felix Boehm to lecture at the Berlin Institute in 1930. Eitingon disliked Groddeck until being treated by him in 1928, after which he regarded him warmly.[13]
https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Georg-Groddeck/dp/1614277761/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Georg+groddeck&qid=1662808416&s=books&sr=1-1 (accessible via Scribd)
尚未,牛奶,果汁,貓狗補給,陽光,秋日,9/13 自殺防治 zoom,9/14 session two,reference going on,SP 2002-2021 已入,包子出京之際,是變局節點,王強服眾北部戰區否,你無法想像,Bacon 吊書袋,說大話,包子最讓人不恥的特質,就是把中國人當畜牲,死多少都無所謂,這麼害生惡生,反人類的貨,自己卻怕死,怕得要命,實在是他媽的孬,這個特質,普丁亦然,這兩個貨,實在是他媽媽的孬孬,遠方有風雷,仍停在母親的故事,不忍卒讀,不能卒讀,劉大任是在回憶,那些年搞運動,搞鬥爭,的過程的細節,這些,我相信,就是當年井岡山那一套,十分恐怖,唯一差別是,他們打炮打得比較節制,照理來說,共產共妻,大家應該是亂打一通,每個人都精盡人亡,才對,剛剛想到,清朝強行規定,人人留辮子,這和中共清零,強行要求,人人沒完沒了核檢,有什麼差別,你要理解,近三四年,所想大致為,存在治療,關係學派,批判的心理治療。BCPSG,後人類的世界,以及今年底的,後結構主義,明年還不知道,也許量子物理和混沌理論,或當代的,物的哲學,
Joseph Goldstein, American vipassana teacher and writer, explains the etymology as follows:
The word dukkha is made up of the prefix du and the root kha. Du means "bad" or "difficult". Kha means "empty". "Empty", here, refers to several things—some specific, others more general. One of the specific meanings refers to the empty axle hole of a wheel. If the axle fits badly into the center hole, we get a very bumpy ride. This is a good analogy for our ride through saṃsāra.
https://rich01.com/how-avoid-crypto-scam-4/
起因是昨天遇 G 君,數月前在 Line 遇某君,被慫恿玩虛擬貨幣,未幾,竟將自己的戶頭,交予對方操作,只見不知來路的錢,轉進轉出,未幾,才知被騙,但已來不及,現有十七人對他提告,十分焦頭爛額,而他其實也是受害者,兩三年前,我聽到的被騙,詐騙方式,通常是網路上,被慫恿炒股,或玩期貨,損失至少百萬,
開車十二小時,才進入山區,山不高,和緩寬闊,樹很少,沒有遮蔽,看起來,背包沈重,燒開水的小爐子,是組合的,不知道他用的,是什麼液體燃料,你要注意,他帶了一本 paperback ,和一雙拖鞋,後者讓我驚訝,他沒有說話,很少喝水,沒有留下痕跡,
自體心理學,講的是 self ,
拉岡桑,講的是 subject,尤其是,decentered subject ,
拉岡桑,把 ego (自我),當成想像,
我認為,他也會把 self,當成想像,
意思是說,都當成美國人的想像,
self ,有社會學,人類學,歷史學,文學,特別是小說,的意涵,
意思是說,不只是心理學的意涵,
事實上,心理學,為了被當成科學,放棄了 self ,這個無法操作性定義的概念,
直到六零年代,人本心理學,才把這個字,找回來,
精神分析,則被 James Strachey 的譯詞誤導,也失去了 self,直到七零年代,Kohut 才幫我們找回來,
我曾提問,有或沒有 self 這個詞,對於心理治療,有什麼影響,
乍看之下,似乎沒有影響,
但是,有一個影響,那就是,你會以為,有解釋在手,你遂無法,「回到經驗的混沌」,
這句話有點費解,
我認為,「回到經驗的混沌」,會有一個好處,
那就是,
在那裡,Kohut 和拉岡桑,終於可以相遇,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasoline_Alley_(2022_film)
Better than I expected. Must be due to that Edward John Drake was an Australian.
I’m pretty sure this Meredith was made in China, because as foreplay, she suddenly started talking in Chinese (中國特色社會主義,人類命運共同體,習核心,兩個確立) before they fucked.
https://b-ok.global/book/815137/cc58d1
The Manuscripts were published for the first time in Moscow in 1932, as part of the Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe edition.[81]They were edited by David Ryazanov under whom György Lukács worked in deciphering them. Lukács would later claim that this experience transformed his interpretation of Marxism permanently.[82] On publication, their importance was recognized by Herbert Marcuse and Henri Lefebvre: Marcuse claimed that the Manuscripts demonstrated the philosophical foundations of Marxism, putting "the entire theory of 'scientific socialism' on a new footing";[83] Lefebvre, with Norbert Guterman, was the first to translate the Manuscripts into a foreign language, publishing a French edition in 1933.[84] Lefebvre's Dialectical Materialism, written in 1934-5, advanced a reconstruction of Marx's entire body of work in the light of the Manuscripts.[85] In spite of this intense interest, copies of the published volumes of the Manuscripts subsequently became difficult to locate, as the Marx–Engels-Gesamtausgabe project was effectively cancelled shortly afterward.[81]
The text became more widely disseminated after the Second World War, with satisfactory editions appearing in English only in 1956, and in French in 1962.[81] In this period, Galvano Della Volpe was the first to translate and discuss the Manuscriptsin Italian, propounding an interpretation that differed greatly from that of Lukács, Marcuse and Lefebvre and that inspired its own school of thought.[85] Many Catholic writers, particularly those in France, took interest in the Manuscripts at this time.[16]The existential Marxism of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre also drew heavily from the Manuscripts.[85] In the USA, the Manuscripts were embraced enthusiastically in the late fifties and early sixties by the intellectual current subsequently known as the New Left,[86] with a volume containing an introduction by Erich Fromm published in 1961.[87]
Since the terminology of alienation does not appear in any prominent manner in Marx's magnum opus Capital, the publication of the Manuscripts caused great debate regarding the relationship of the "Young Marx" to the "Mature Marx".[88]The Manuscripts were the most important reference for "Marxist humanism",[1] which saw continuity between their Hegelian philosophical humanism and the economic theory of the later Marx.[89] Conversely, the Soviet Union largely ignored the Manuscripts, believing them to belong to Marx's "early writings", which expound a line of thought that had led him nowhere.[4]The structural Marxism of Louis Althusser inherited the Soviet Union's harsh verdict of Marx's early writings.[90] Althusser believed there was a "break" in Marx's development[1] - a break that divides Marx's thought into an "ideological" period before 1845, and a scientific period after.[91] Others who ascribed a break to Marx idealized the Manuscripts and believed the young Marx to be the real Marx.
“Man is born broken. He lives by mending. The grace of God is glue.”
天佑台灣,颱風擦邊球,帶來豐沛雨量,你要理解,天底下,政治皆髒,但中國政治,除髒之外,腐臭不堪,腐臭的原因,是因為泡在醬缸,五千年不見天日,你要理解,全新世不過萬年,有文字不過五千年,意思是說,有史以來,就掀不開缸,去年聽彭仁郁說轉型正義,訪談白色恐佈猶存之受害者,她說,很多檔案,國民黨還在遮掩,尚未解封,尚未公開,在座某君說,很多檔案,恐怕早已離開台灣,置於外館,或已銷毀,意思是說,你永遠不會知道,歷史真相,你知道的,是你「被」容許知道的,你要想一想,是誰決定了,那個「被」字,國民黨如此,你要理解,共產黨只會更糟,百千萬億兆倍,劉大任有一個問題,那就是不捨風雅,我性喜搔陰囊,你可以理解,遂無風無雅可言,劉大任說,二流小說家,其存在理由,只是為尚未出世的大小說積澱,大小說須達「國族寓言或神話的高度」,我皺眉想,大小說須達陰囊的冬暖夏涼,你要理解,陰囊是一個奇特的外於自己的倉庫,有點像外館,裡面堆著尚未解封的檔案,一葉知秋,一夜知秋,遂不知該穿,還是不該穿褲子,你要理解,今年夏天極熱,沒有人該穿褲子,你要理解,左翼知識份子,比如說,Victor Serge ,比如說,雷霆 (注意,不是雷鋒),比如說,陳映真,比如說,佛洛姆,都有一個致命的盲點,那就是以為早期馬克思, 1844 年的人道宣言是「真的」,意思是說,都忘了讀吉拉斯的新階級,那才是「真的」共產主義的趙家人的現實,天為帳,地為毯,和平東路,動物醫院,風已息,雨已歇,資本主義,罪惡深重,但是,用共產主義,來對治之,是請鬼抓藥方,罪惡更為深重,復以,資本家藉栽培中共,一切利益導向,讓中共坐大,意思是說,製造了自己的敵人,所以,我們再說一次,資本主義,罪惡深重,的罪惡,其實是資本家和趙家人,兩者聯手,是獲利最大的階級,我們知道,系統有其 instrumental convergence,意思是說,工具理性,會為了保命,自我繁衍,自我茁壯,資本家和趙家人,為什麼這麼喜歡打炮,滿地私生子,就是這個原因,接下來,四月息緣,只做一事,你要理解,明中葉開始,直至清滅,閉關鎖國六百年,民初略歇,四九年中共篡政後復之,近四十年的前三十年略歇,乃至近十年復之,意思是說,近六百年,只有兩段,各三十年,門戶打開,可見,關門是常態,愚蠢是常態,所謂,破窗而出,拆門而出,乃至拆掉龍天樓而復自然做人,這才是雷霆該做的事,劉大任的包袱在,六零年代,至七零年代,台灣實在落後,尤其是去美國後,你簡直不敢相信,那種落後,那種無知,你是怎麼忍受過來的,意思是說,他的包袱是,「文化落差,造成認同混亂」,一般留學生做法是,乾脆做美國人算了,他不願如此,但是顯然,又無法做台灣人,遂只能做一個「想像中國的人」,六零年代,我在嘉義,七二年起,我在台北,我沒有文化菁英的包袱,劉大任有,這明顯是台大給一代青年造成的悲劇,我沒有這種鳥悲劇,雷霆唸台大物理,肌肉發達,像阿甘或馬英九一樣,每天慢跑,做代聯會主席,又參加地下讀書會,免不了讀一些禁書,毛澤東矛盾論持久戰,馬克思 1844 手稿,等等,意思是說,雷霆分明就是雷鋒,看到這裡,我不禁長嘆,劉大任完了,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity#Intelligence_explosion
The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical point in time at which technological growth will become radically faster and uncontrollable, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilization.[2][3]According to the most popular version of the singularity hypothesis, I.J. Good's intelligence explosion model, an upgradable intelligent agent will eventually enter a "runaway reaction" of self-improvement cycles, each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing an "explosion" in intelligence and resulting in a powerful superintelligence that qualitatively far surpasses all human intelligence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestrated_objective_reduction
Orchestrated objective reduction (Orch OR) is a theory which postulates that consciousness originates at the quantum level inside neurons, rather than the conventional view that it is a product of connections between neurons. The mechanism is held to be a quantum process called objective reduction that is orchestrated by cellular structures called microtubules. It is proposed that the theory may answer the hard problem of consciousness and provide a mechanism for free will.[1] The hypothesis was first put forward in the early 1990s by Nobel laureate for physics, Roger Penrose, and anaesthesiologist and psychologist Stuart Hameroff.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadows_of_the_Mind
Penrose hypothesizes that:
你要理解,中共毀滅了中文,用很長的完整的句子,江說大局藏在人民日報新華網央視新聞聯播,什麼叫做很長的完整的句子,你要理解,德國哲學也會用很長的字,說很長的完整的句子,我曾說,Kohut 是用英文寫德文,就是這個意思,所以他的書難讀,中共的很長的完整的句子,我想,並不是要用中文寫德文,有沒有可能,是要用中文寫俄文,這個想法很有趣,要再確認,總之,這種文字,不是中文,意思是說,中共不是人,遑論中國人,舉例來說,中共的句子如下,「河南省委書記樓陽生發表講話歌頌秦三世習包對於唐山姦殺四個中國女人的九個唐山男人的性器官的發育的遺傳學基因編輯改造的研究的突破性發現是舉世聞名的兩個確立的成就的數點說明」,你要理解,康德寫不出這種句子,所以我們十分確定,這不是德文,你要理解,陳映真當年是用中文寫日文,所以句法遣字有東洋和風,七等生則是用中文寫丹麥文,所以句法遣字有齊克果風,王文興背海的人,則是白色恐佈的恐怖的中文,回到大局,我想江搞錯了,大局不是藏在官媒的風向,大局藏在接下來數周的檯面下操作,以及最後一擊,意思是說,包子正在作水很深的謀略佈局,屆時所謂投票,王小洪應該會操盤,數萬刀把子武警持槍看著你投票,比如說,但是我們先前說過,如果軍方中立,甚至倒習,王小洪應會收斂,不敢這麼囂張,總之大局在軍方立場,這不是揣測官媒,捕風捉影,所能得知,以前我們說過,反習反共有兩說,意思是說,讓習連任做皇帝,恰是加速滅共,反之,換人做,則反為中共續命,但是你要理解,習這種紅二代貨色,對武統台灣,有一種執著,一般技術官僚上台,就事論事,集體領導,無法獨斷,對於發動戰爭,會比較節制,這是為什麼,為了拯救世界,必須除丁除包,這是全世界,有志氣的殺手的夢想,要注意,近日共匪無人機騷擾金門,意圖挑事,意思是說,為發動局部戰爭,製造事端,你要理解,包子需要戒嚴軍管,藉此危機要求連任,
有一種人,你跟他說話,
你就覺得,事情似乎沒有那麼糟,你似乎沒有那麼糟,
你的心,逐漸,安靜下來,
你要理解,上述是理想的狀態,意思是說,治療者像是海綿,
我本來是要說海洋,但是我知道他做不到,
我本來也想說恆河,但是我知道他不是印度人,
也不是,遠藤周作,
總之,他是海綿,洗碗的那種,不過必須大一點,吸收了,你說的話,你流的淚,
然後,他說了,幾句話,
然後,那幾句話,似乎讓,沒有希望,看到「一點」希望,
你要理解,只是一點,意思是說,沒有人,能夠承諾,很多,
這個一點,用唯識學的話來說,就是乍現,
或吳汝鈞的話來說,就是詐現,
不管是哪一個ㄓㄚˋ,
我想,這兩個ㄓㄚˋ,就是他吸收進去的字,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juan-David_Nasio
Came to him via David Henderson too.
to commit an act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anima_and_animus
The anima and animus are described in Carl Jung's school of analytical psychology as part of his theory of the collective unconscious. Jung described the animus as the unconsciousmasculine side of a woman, and the anima as the unconscious feminine side of a man, each transcending the personal psyche. Jung's theory states that the anima and animus are the two primary anthropomorphic archetypes of the unconscious mind, as opposed to the theriomorphic and inferior function of the shadow archetypes. He believed they are the abstract symbol sets that formulate the archetype of the Self.
Re-Encountering Jung: Analytical psychology and contemporary psychoanalysis, ed. Robin Brown, Routledge, 2017 (Chap 11. Staying Alive: Anima and objet a, by David Henderson)
午後書審,海上颱風,昨日樹倒,今日寄信,郵局塞車,背包斷掉,安全別針,你要理解,人類是以,人類規格,覺知世界,太大太小,太快太慢,不可思議,皆不可察,小北百貨,再來一包,安全別針,布魯斯威利,為什麼拍了這麼多濫片,因為他以為這個世界,缺少動作,這個世界,的確缺少動作,但他的不是動作,某蘇格拉底前的哲學家,一輩子「只留下五個字」,這才是動作,有趣的是,沒有人知道,是哪五個字,這個「沒有人知道」,也是動作,意思是說,我們一下子,就已經有兩個動作,如果 ego 是作業系統 (operation system) ,大腦是 CPU,self 就是不同的廠牌商標,我說過,注意王小洪,近日將為包賣命,出手屠殺異己,但真正的關鍵在軍隊,包子佈局軍隊,主要是高官階層,甚至這些高官,應該都會騎牆二心,「且看兵變,如何決定中國命運」,意思是說,小洪小心,今日屠夫,明日被宰,
What is self ?
self 分明是假象,「時時勤拂拭,莫使惹塵埃」,
self 是操作的機制 (agency of execution),「『我』今天下午要去高雄」,
所以,self 必包含 ego,意思是說,你要想清楚,你要怎麼去高雄,
反之,ego 未必可以達到 self, self 未必可以達到 subject,
意思是說,ego 是那個有名的家政婦,「時時勤拂拭,莫使惹塵埃」,至於是「誰」在勤拂拭,我們還不知道,
self 是那個家政婦的後設,意思是說,那個家政婦,有一天突然開竅,自覺的說,「我是一個家政婦」,
subject 是那個家政婦的「後設的後設」,意思是說,那個家政婦,有一天突然覺悟,深刻的說,「我是一個有主體性的莊嚴的家政婦」,
意思是說,洗碗工,每天洗五千個碗,洗了一生一世,居然,洗出主體性的莊嚴,
比照「一個人的完成:完人的生活與風姿之一」(程兆熊),這件事,我們稱之為,「一個洗碗工的完成」,
意思是說,這是由下而上的 (bottom up),從基層做起的,腳踏實地的人生,
程先生,另外兩本,「大地人物:理學人物之生活的體認」,「大地邊緣人物:禪門人物的風姿與領悟」,我年輕時候,也很喜歡,
六識,乃至意識,的匯合之所,末那識,
面具盔甲,待人接物,應世所需,
就是,你的「名」,
翕闢成變,的「翕」,
翕的定義,能量匯聚內攝,以致成形,
我本應為無名氏,數月前參加告別式,師父反覆依族譜唱名,方知,陰陽兩界,居然,有我的名,有我的位子,
藉創傷,來提醒自己,界定自己,個人集體皆然,
「百年國恥」是中國的一些學者、政治人物用來描述中國從十九世紀中葉到二十世紀中葉歷史的一個敘事框架。百年國恥的開端是1839年第一次鴉片戰爭,以1940年代抗戰勝利及中華人民共和國成立為終結。此詞起源於1915年中國民族主義崛起的氛圍,反對中國北洋政府接受日本政府提出的二十一條要求。後來中國國民黨和中國共產黨都普遍使用。
The "century of humiliation", also known as the "hundred years of national humiliation" (in Mandarin 百年国耻 Bǎinián Guóchǐ), is a term used in China to describe the period of intervention and subjugation of the Qing dynasty and the Republic of China by Western powers and Japan from 1839 to 1949.
Cf.
Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations, Zheng Wang, Columbia University Press, 2012
How the Century of Humiliation Influences China’s Ambitions Today (2019)
三毒,貪瞋癡,貪,greed,desire,瞋,narcissism,癡,attachment,
自戀,就是把自己黏合成一體的膠水,
自戀,就是不知自己的界限,以為別人 (外於自己的他者) 是自己的意志的延伸,以致無情糟蹋他者,而不自知,或自知但覺得無所謂,或自知但覺得天經地義,合該如此,
寧與友邦,不予家奴,
友邦,就是外於自己的他者,有必要籠絡討好,家奴,就是屬於自己的財產,管理壓榨即可,何來疼惜,
自戀,過猶不及,和歷史,有莫大關係,
小說,通常,第一人稱,第三人稱,
第二人稱,難行,為什麼,
第三人稱,是作者的觀點,是全知的觀點,是舉頭三尺的觀點,是奧林匹亞山上諸神的觀點,是老天爺的觀點,
人在做,天在看,就是第三人稱,
第一人稱,是作者的同理,設身處地的觀點,
第二人稱,是一個人寫信給另一個人,說來說去,畢竟與第三個人無關,意思是說,抒情有餘,過度私密,以致單調無趣,與這個世界無關,
self vs gender,男性,女性,LGBTQ,各有文章,