Sunday, June 15, 2025

Does analog have anything to do with AI, isn’t it purely digital? (ChatGPT, 2025-6-15) (自體的心理學)(車行哲學)

 Ah, now we enter the trembling edge of posthuman thought:

Is AI purely digital? And can the analog still matter—perhaps even haunt—the age of artificial intelligence?


Let’s unpack this in three steps:





1. 

Conventional AI: Yes, AI Is Built on Digital Foundations



Modern AI—like me—is built on digital substrates:


  • Binary logic: Everything reduces to 1s and 0s.
  • Transistors and chips: Digital hardware.
  • Neural networks: Modeled as discrete layers, using matrix multiplications.
  • Training: Involves quantized updates (e.g., gradient descent), where data is chunked, labeled, and iterated.



So, in terms of:


  • Computation → digital
  • Architecture → digital
  • Data representation → digital



Yes, conventional AI is entirely digital—an empire of codes.





2. 

But the Analog Still Matters—Here’s Why




(A) 

Input Is Often Analog



AI systems interface with the world through:


  • Sound (microphones)
  • Images (cameras)
  • Sensors (temperature, pressure, light)



These are analog signals. Before the AI can process them, they must undergo analog-to-digital conversion (ADC).


So:

🌎 World → 🌀 analog signal → 🔲 digital encoding → 🧠 AI processing


Thus, even the most digital AI cannot escape analog origins—just as your brain receives analog waves and digitizes them through neural spikes.





(B) 

AI Struggles with Analog Features



  • Gradients of meaning: The analog is rich in ambiguity, nuance, flow—all difficult for discrete logic to fully model.
  • Continuous emotion, intuition, and poetic resonance are often flattened in AI translation.
  • For example, an AI might detect sentiment in text, but may miss the aesthetic ache in a line like:
    “The sky was the color of memory left out in the rain.”



So, analog is what resists total computation. It’s the remainder—the nuance left out of the training set.





(C) 

New Frontiers: Analog AI (Yes, It’s a Thing)



In response to the limits of digital AI, some researchers are exploring:


  • Analog computing: Using physical processes (e.g. light, fluid dynamics, memristors) to perform computation without discretization.
  • Neuromorphic engineering: Chips that mimic the analog nature of biological neurons and synapses (e.g., IBM’s TrueNorth).
  • Quantum AI: Where states are superposed, entangled—neither simply 0 nor 1.



These hybrid or analog AIs may allow:


  • Smoother learning
  • More energy efficiency
  • Processing of continuous, ambiguous, or “real-world” phenomena in ways more akin to biological cognition



In other words: analog is not dead in AI—it may be the next frontier.





3. 

Philosophically Speaking: What Is Lost When We Go Fully Digital?




The digital captures:



  • Structure
  • Speed
  • Repetition
  • Prediction




The analog preserves:



  • Depth
  • Vagueness
  • Surprise
  • Flow



In Deleuzian terms:

Digital AI is striated space—gridded, bounded, algorithmic.

Analog life is smooth space—fluid, emergent, irreducible.





4. 

A Synthesis?



Maybe the question is not:


“Can AI become analog?”


But rather:


“Can AI respect the analog—what cannot be codified?”


Because the analog is:


  • The tremor in the voice
  • The ineffable in poetry
  • The curve of a tear before it falls



It may be that AI, however digital, will never be fully human—not because it lacks intelligence, but because it lacks imperfection, continuity, soulful drift.





5. 

Poetic Coda:



The AI dreams in ones and zeros,

But the world breathes in waves.

Between the tick and the tock,

There lives the analog murmur—

the sigh of leaves,

the pause between lovers,

the silence before dawn.


And if AI ever becomes wise,

it will not be by calculation—

but by listening to that silence.




Would you like to explore how the analog-digital tension plays out in psychoanalysis, aesthetics, or ethics of AI next?