Thursday, September 26, 2024

So, nuanced is the key word for proper understanding? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-26)

Yes, **nuanced** is indeed a key word for proper understanding, both in psychological development and in philosophical or intellectual inquiry.


### Psychological Understanding

In psychological terms, a nuanced understanding allows individuals to appreciate the complexities and subtleties of their own experiences, relationships, and emotions. Instead of seeing things in black-and-white terms (as in the case of splitting), a nuanced approach involves recognizing that people, situations, and feelings can contain both positive and negative elements simultaneously. This balanced view helps in managing emotional responses more effectively, fostering healthier relationships, and reducing psychological distress.


For example, in therapy, cultivating a nuanced perspective helps individuals move beyond rigid, extreme viewpoints, enabling them to see themselves and others more realistically, with both strengths and flaws. It is a hallmark of emotional maturity and resilience.


### Philosophical and Intellectual Understanding

In philosophy and intellectual discourse, nuance is crucial for grasping the full depth of ideas, theories, or arguments. A nuanced thinker avoids oversimplification and embraces the complexity inherent in most subjects. This means recognizing that different perspectives can hold validity, and truth often lies not in extreme positions, but in the subtle interplay of ideas.


For instance, in ethics, a nuanced understanding helps in navigating moral dilemmas where clear-cut answers are often elusive. In philosophy, nuance allows one to integrate multiple viewpoints, avoiding dogmatism and enabling more sophisticated, balanced conclusions.


### Nuanced Thinking as a Path to Truth

A nuanced understanding does not shy away from complexity, contradiction, or ambiguity. Instead, it seeks to engage with these aspects in a way that enriches insight. This applies across disciplines, whether in science, philosophy, politics, or personal growth. It moves beyond dualism, simplistic binaries, and absolute judgments, fostering a deeper, more holistic grasp of reality.


### Conclusion

Ultimately, nuance is a key to proper understanding because it opens the door to complexity, fosters intellectual and emotional flexibility, and encourages a balanced approach to knowledge and relationships. It is a vital skill for personal growth, effective communication, and sound decision-making.

車行形上學 (metaphysics of van life)

幾天前我們說過,黃河文明,是下水道糞坑文明,

既然是下水道糞坑,何來鳶飛魚躍,

意思是說,生命在南方,

夜行貨車,是南行貨車,

意思是說,我今天下午要去墾丁,

你要理解,我們的生命,我們的生活,我們的生涯,一舉一動,都是被精算的,

有趣的是,精明幹練者,如柯沈黃,以為自己在精算,但實情不是被自己精算,而是被食物鏈能指鏈的上級精算,意思是說,一級一級往上推,一級一級都有他的上級,坐在金字塔頂端的那個不識字的光著屁股的冒牌貨,我們遂稱之為穿新衣的神權皇帝,

你要理解,屁股很重要,尤其是翹翹的那種,所以共匪發射兩百萬億枚,洲際彈道導彈,有趣的是,無一倖免,皆墜落廣西,

全聯,牛奶,


Therefore, the way to go beyond the primitive dualism, is to learn how to tolerate the ambivalence, frustration, and uncertainty? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-26)

Yes, the way to move beyond primitive dualism—whether in philosophical thought or psychological functioning—is indeed to learn how to tolerate ambivalence, frustration, and uncertainty. This process is central to emotional and cognitive development, as well as personal growth.


### Psychological Perspective: Tolerating Ambivalence

In psychology, especially in psychodynamic theory, the ability to tolerate ambivalence is a sign of emotional maturity. Ambivalence refers to the capacity to hold conflicting emotions, beliefs, or perceptions simultaneously, without splitting them into rigid "good" and "bad" categories. For example, recognizing that someone can have both positive and negative traits, or that a situation can be both rewarding and challenging, is part of a more integrated, realistic view of the world.


For individuals who rely on splitting as a defense mechanism, the challenge is to develop the capacity to sit with the discomfort that comes from holding multiple, often contradictory feelings or ideas at once. This involves accepting that people, situations, and even oneself are complex and multifaceted, and that not everything can be neatly categorized into dualistic extremes.


### Tolerating Frustration and Uncertainty

Frustration and uncertainty are often part of this process because integrating conflicting ideas or feelings requires patience and the ability to deal with confusion or anxiety. In everyday life, this might involve managing the frustration of not having clear answers or outcomes, and learning to accept the ambiguity that comes with complex decisions, relationships, or emotions. It’s about resisting the urge to simplify or escape into black-and-white thinking in order to feel more in control.


In therapeutic settings, such as when treating borderline personality disorder, helping individuals tolerate frustration, uncertainty, and ambivalence is a key goal. Through therapeutic work, individuals learn how to reflect on their emotions, integrate opposing feelings, and cope with the distress that arises from unresolved tensions.


### Philosophical Perspective: Beyond Dualism

On a more philosophical level, moving beyond dualism often involves embracing a more holistic or integrated view of reality, where the complexity and interconnectedness of existence are acknowledged. This could involve exploring non-dualistic philosophies, such as in Eastern traditions like Taoism or Buddhism, where reality is seen as a dynamic interplay of forces rather than a set of binary oppositions. Tolerating uncertainty here might mean accepting that not all aspects of reality can be fully understood, labeled, or controlled, and that ambiguity is an inherent part of existence.


### Conclusion

Whether in psychology or philosophy, transcending primitive dualism involves developing the capacity to tolerate and integrate ambiguity, frustration, and uncertainty. This process leads to a more balanced, nuanced view of the world and the self, allowing for greater emotional resilience, deeper understanding, and personal growth.

Can we say that dualism, to make distinction, is our way to make sense of the world? Therefore, splitting, the primitive defense mechanism used by the borderline personality disorder, is the primitive dualism? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-26)

Yes, we can draw a parallel between the concept of dualism as a way of making sense of the world and the psychological mechanism of "splitting" seen in borderline personality disorder (BPD). Both involve a fundamental tendency to categorize and separate phenomena into distinct, often opposing, parts in order to make sense of complex realities.


### Dualism as a Way of Understanding

Philosophically, dualism is the practice of distinguishing between two opposing or distinct elements, such as mind and body, good and evil, or subject and object. This form of thinking helps structure our understanding of reality by simplifying the complexities of existence into more manageable, polarized categories. It reflects a deep-rooted cognitive tendency to create binary distinctions as a way to grasp the complexities of the world, allowing us to impose order on what might otherwise seem chaotic or incomprehensible.


### Splitting as a Primitive Dualism

In the psychological context, "splitting" is a defense mechanism often associated with borderline personality disorder, where individuals see people or situations in extreme, all-or-nothing terms (e.g., viewing someone as entirely good or entirely bad). It’s a primitive mechanism because it arises from a more basic level of psychological functioning, where the capacity to hold and integrate ambiguity or complexity is underdeveloped. 


This "splitting" can be seen as a form of primitive dualism, in that it reflects an inability to reconcile opposing qualities into a cohesive whole. Just as dualism divides reality into two distinct categories, splitting divides emotional or interpersonal experiences into extremes, often to reduce anxiety or manage overwhelming feelings.


### Primitive Dualism and Development

From a developmental perspective, the capacity to hold both good and bad aspects of a person, situation, or self in a unified understanding evolves with maturity. In childhood, and in certain psychological conditions like BPD, this ability is still forming or impaired, leading to the more rigid, polarized thinking of splitting. 


Thus, it is fair to say that splitting represents a kind of "primitive dualism," where the world is divided into extreme, separate categories in an attempt to make sense of overwhelming experiences. Over time, through emotional development or therapeutic intervention, individuals can develop the capacity for more nuanced, integrated thinking, moving beyond this primitive dualism.


In summary, dualism can be seen as a general way humans make sense of the world through distinctions. Splitting in BPD can be considered a primitive form of this dualistic thinking, where emotional experiences are divided into extremes to cope with psychological distress.

Can we say that without dualism there wouldn’t be science? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-26)

The relationship between dualism and science is complex, but it is not necessary to conclude that without dualism, there wouldn’t be science.


Dualism, particularly Cartesian dualism (mind-body dualism), played an important historical role in the development of modern science. René Descartes' separation of the mind (consciousness) from the body (physical matter) allowed for a more focused study of the physical world as something that could be objectively understood, measured, and manipulated. By distinguishing between the mental and physical realms, Descartes and others created a framework where the natural world could be investigated without reference to metaphysical or spiritual concerns, which was conducive to the rise of empirical science.


However, science does not inherently rely on dualism. Many scientific frameworks operate on monistic or even non-dualistic principles. For example, in materialist monism, everything, including consciousness, is understood to emerge from physical processes, and science is used to study those processes without assuming a separate mental or spiritual realm. Similarly, in more recent developments like quantum physics and systems biology, reality is often viewed as interconnected and holistic, challenging strict dualistic separations between subject and object, or mind and matter.


In other words, while dualism historically facilitated the early development of science by delineating the physical world as a distinct object of study, science itself does not require dualism as a foundational principle. Different metaphysical frameworks, including non-dualistic ones, can still support scientific inquiry.

Is monism inevitably pantheism? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-26)

Monism is the philosophical view that there is only one fundamental substance or principle underlying all of reality. Pantheism, on the other hand, is the belief that the divine is identical to the universe or that everything is God. While monism and pantheism can overlap, they are not inevitably the same.


For instance, some forms of monism, like materialistic monism, posit that everything is made of physical matter, but this doesn’t necessarily entail that everything is divine, as pantheism would suggest. Similarly, idealist monism might argue that everything is a manifestation of the mind or consciousness, but again, without necessarily equating the totality of reality with the divine.


However, some forms of monism, particularly in certain philosophical or mystical traditions, do lead to pantheistic interpretations. Spinoza’s philosophy is an example of this. He proposed a form of monism where God and nature (or the universe) are one and the same, which is considered pantheism.


In conclusion, monism is not inevitably pantheism, but certain forms of monism can develop into pantheistic views, depending on how the nature of the "one substance" is interpreted.

NVivo 15 with AI

https://lumivero.com/nvivo-15-rad/?utm_source=marketo&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nv-email-nurture-nvivo15&utm_content=prospectacademicemail4&mkt_tok=NDA1LUJMSy01ODYAAAGVyNYUpjwBMoYD23IlZf22klUXG6iHgl95T2fGxzNUMHtBRPJ0mi5RvrM_NGswg2VEypv-BmCemjoxJurxdGxBbrrfmgCTzNIO_jIE2HJg

意思是說,AI 直接幫你讀,幫你分析,質性的文本,然後匿名,不掛名作者,或協同作者,

如果,這個文本,是心理治療的文本,AI 會讀出什麼,

Wednesday, September 25, 2024

Your robot therapist is not your therapist: understanding the role of AI-powered mental health chatbots

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/digital-health/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2023.1278186/full

How does poststructuralism deal with the dilemma of monism vs dualism? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-25)

Poststructuralism approaches the dilemma of monism versus dualism by challenging the very foundations of these categories, rather than attempting to resolve or reconcile them within traditional metaphysical frameworks. Poststructuralist thinkers, influenced by structuralism, deconstruction, and other 20th-century intellectual movements, often reject binary oppositions and essentialist categories in favor of fluid, contingent, and dynamic understandings of reality, subjectivity, and knowledge.


Here’s how key poststructuralist ideas deal with the monism-dualism dilemma:


### 1. **Rejection of Essentialism and Binary Oppositions**

   - **View**: Poststructuralism rejects essentialism, which is the idea that entities have a fixed essence or set of defining characteristics. It also challenges the binary opposition between categories like mind and body, material and immaterial, or subject and object.

   - **How it deals with monism/dualism**: Poststructuralists see the monism-dualism debate as part of the larger tradition of Western metaphysics, which they critique for being based on hierarchical binaries. Instead of privileging either the mind over the body (dualism) or reducing everything to a single substance (monism), poststructuralists argue that such binaries are constructed through language and power relations, and they seek to deconstruct these oppositions.


### 2. **Derrida and Deconstruction**

   - **View**: Jacques Derrida's deconstruction focuses on the instability and ambiguity of language, showing that meaning is always deferred and that binary oppositions (such as mind/body, mental/physical) are never stable.

   - **How it deals with monism/dualism**: Derrida would argue that the distinction between monism and dualism is itself a false dichotomy constructed by Western metaphysical traditions. He would deconstruct this binary by revealing how each term depends on the other for its meaning and cannot stand alone. In this sense, the debate is not one that can be definitively resolved, because the terms are contingent, context-dependent, and ultimately undecidable.


### 3. **Foucault and Power/Knowledge**

   - **View**: Michel Foucault emphasizes how concepts like subjectivity, the body, and knowledge are produced through discourses and power relations rather than reflecting some fundamental metaphysical reality.

   - **How it deals with monism/dualism**: Foucault does not directly engage with the metaphysical debate of monism versus dualism, but his work can be seen as undermining the debate by focusing on how knowledge systems create these distinctions. Rather than asking whether the mind and body are distinct or one, Foucault would examine how the distinction between mind and body is constructed, by whom, and for what purposes. His work shifts attention from metaphysical speculation to the historical and political processes that produce such categories.


### 4. **Gilles Deleuze (Immanence and Becoming)**

   - **View**: Gilles Deleuze, often associated with poststructuralism, rejects the traditional dualist framework and embraces a philosophy of **immanence**, where everything exists within a single plane of reality that is always in flux. Deleuze’s concepts of **becoming** and **multiplicity** challenge static categories like mind and body or mental and physical.

   - **How it deals with monism/dualism**: Deleuze rejects dualism in favor of a radical **monism of immanence**, but this is not a reductionist monism. Instead of positing a single, fixed substance, he argues that reality consists of endless processes of becoming, where distinctions like mind and body are temporary and emergent from dynamic interactions. His concept of **becoming** emphasizes fluidity, rejecting the static binaries inherent in traditional dualism.


### 5. **Jean Baudrillard (Simulacra and Simulation)**

   - **View**: Baudrillard’s philosophy addresses how reality is mediated and constructed through signs and symbols, especially in a postmodern world dominated by media and hyperreality.

   - **How it deals with monism/dualism**: For Baudrillard, the question of whether reality is monist or dualist becomes less relevant in a world where the distinction between reality and representation collapses. He argues that in the age of simulacra (copies without originals), the distinction between mind and body, real and imaginary, or material and immaterial loses its meaning. The debate over monism and dualism dissolves in the hyperreal, where distinctions between real and unreal, or physical and non-physical, become indistinguishable.


### 6. **Luce Irigaray (Sexual Difference)**

   - **View**: Luce Irigaray critiques the phallocentric structures of Western philosophy, including the dualism between mind and body, which she argues are based on male-dominated discourses that erase feminine subjectivity.

   - **How it deals with monism/dualism**: Irigaray argues that the mind-body dualism reflects patriarchal structures that privilege the masculine over the feminine (associated with the body). Rather than simply rejecting dualism in favor of monism, she seeks to reconceptualize difference in non-hierarchical ways. Irigaray does not aim for a reductionist monism, but rather a transformation of how we understand dualities, emphasizing fluidity and relationality instead of rigid binaries.


### 7. **Poststructuralist View of the Subject**

   - **View**: In poststructuralist thought, the concept of the **subject** is fragmented and decentered. Instead of a stable, unified self (as often assumed in both monism and dualism), the subject is seen as constructed through discursive practices, language, and social relations.

   - **How it deals with monism/dualism**: By decentering the subject, poststructuralism challenges the notion of a fixed, essential distinction between mind and body. The self is not something that can be neatly divided into dualistic categories (such as mental and physical), nor is it reducible to a single substance (monism). Instead, the subject is always in flux, shaped by external forces and internal processes.


### Conclusion:

Poststructuralism does not resolve the dilemma of monism versus dualism in the traditional sense because it questions the very premises upon which this debate is based. Rather than affirming one side or synthesizing them, poststructuralist thinkers challenge the binary itself, emphasizing fluidity, multiplicity, and the constructed nature of categories like mind and body. They focus on how such distinctions are produced through language, power, and social structures, rather than viewing them as metaphysical absolutes. In this way, poststructuralism transcends the monism-dualism debate, seeking to destabilize the categories themselves rather than settling the issue in favor of one or the other.

Which philosophers have dealt with the dilemma of monism vs dualism? And how did they deal with it? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-25)

The debate between monism and dualism has been a central theme in philosophy, particularly in metaphysics and philosophy of mind. Different philosophers have approached this dilemma in various ways throughout history. Here are some of the key thinkers and their contributions:


### 1. **Plato (Dualism)**

   - **View**: Plato is a classic dualist, distinguishing between the physical realm (the world of becoming) and the realm of Forms (the world of being).

   - **How he dealt with it**: Plato argued that the soul is separate from the body, and that the soul belongs to the eternal world of Forms, whereas the body belongs to the material, changeable world. This is known as **Platonic Dualism**, where the soul seeks to understand the eternal truths in the realm of Forms but is hindered by its imprisonment in the physical body.


### 2. **Aristotle (Modified Dualism or Hylomorphism)**

   - **View**: Aristotle rejected Plato's radical dualism and proposed a form of **hylomorphism**. He suggested that everything is composed of both matter (hyle) and form (morphe), including the human soul and body.

   - **How he dealt with it**: While he acknowledged the distinction between body and soul, Aristotle saw them as intimately connected, with the soul as the form of the body. The soul cannot exist without the body, thus he presents a **qualified dualism** where the body and soul are distinct but inseparable in living beings.


### 3. **René Descartes (Substance Dualism)**

   - **View**: Descartes is one of the most famous proponents of **substance dualism**, which posits that the mind and body are two fundamentally different substances: the mind (res cogitans) as thinking and non-extended, and the body (res extensa) as extended and non-thinking.

   - **How he dealt with it**: Descartes struggled with the problem of how these two substances interact. His famous "mind-body problem" led him to hypothesize that the pineal gland in the brain might be the site of interaction, though this explanation was never fully satisfactory. His dualism became highly influential, but also faced critiques regarding how two such different substances could causally interact.


### 4. **Baruch Spinoza (Monism)**

   - **View**: Spinoza is a leading advocate of **monism**, arguing that there is only one substance, which he called "God or Nature" (Deus sive Natura). Mind and body, according to Spinoza, are not distinct substances but rather two **attributes** of the one substance.

   - **How he dealt with it**: Spinoza's **attribute dualism** allowed him to maintain that mental and physical phenomena are two aspects of the same underlying reality. This approach eliminates the interaction problem of Descartes' dualism, as mind and body are simply two ways of perceiving the same reality.


### 5. **Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (Pre-established Harmony)**

   - **View**: Leibniz also accepted a form of dualism but argued for a **pre-established harmony** between mind and body.

   - **How he dealt with it**: According to Leibniz, the mind and body do not interact causally; rather, they run in parallel, pre-coordinated by God. This view sidesteps the problem of interaction by positing that mental and physical events correspond to each other because they were synchronized at creation by divine design.


### 6. **Immanuel Kant (Critical Philosophy - Dualism/Monism Synthesis)**

   - **View**: Kant attempted to bridge dualism and monism with his **transcendental idealism**. He distinguished between the **noumenal world** (things as they are in themselves) and the **phenomenal world** (things as they appear to us).

   - **How he dealt with it**: While Kant maintained that we cannot know the noumenal world, he argued that the mind plays an active role in shaping the phenomenal world. In this sense, the physical world is shaped by mental categories, leading to a **dual-aspect** view that reconciles the gap between mind and body without claiming one is reducible to the other.


### 7. **Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (Absolute Idealism)**

   - **View**: Hegel rejected traditional dualism in favor of **absolute idealism**, where reality is understood as a unified whole.

   - **How he dealt with it**: Hegel’s **dialectical process** involves the resolution of contradictions (such as mind and body, or subject and object) into a higher synthesis. For Hegel, both the mental and physical realms are aspects of an evolving totality—the **Absolute**—in which mind and matter are ultimately reconciled.


### 8. **Bertrand Russell (Neutral Monism)**

   - **View**: Russell proposed **neutral monism**, arguing that both mental and physical phenomena arise from a more fundamental reality that is neither purely mental nor purely physical.

   - **How he dealt with it**: In neutral monism, mind and matter are constructed from a neutral substance or set of events. This view avoids the difficulties of both Cartesian dualism and materialist monism by positing a neutral basis for both realms.


### 9. **Maurice Merleau-Ponty (Phenomenology - Embodied Mind)**

   - **View**: Merleau-Ponty, influenced by phenomenology, criticized traditional dualism and proposed that the body is not merely an object in the world, but the very medium through which we experience the world.

   - **How he dealt with it**: His **embodied phenomenology** rejects the sharp distinction between mind and body, arguing that consciousness is always embodied, and that perception is the primary way through which the world is disclosed. In this sense, he dissolves the dualism by focusing on the embodied nature of experience.


### 10. **David Chalmers (Property Dualism)**

   - **View**: Chalmers, a contemporary philosopher, advocates for **property dualism**, the idea that while there is only one kind of substance (usually conceived as physical), it can have both physical and non-physical properties.

   - **How he dealt with it**: Chalmers' approach to the mind-body problem, particularly the **hard problem of consciousness**, holds that while the brain is a physical entity, it has properties (like subjective experience or qualia) that cannot be fully explained by physical science. This avoids a strict Cartesian dualism but recognizes the irreducibility of mental properties.


### Conclusion:

Philosophers have approached the dilemma of monism vs. dualism in various ways, from Plato’s radical dualism to Spinoza’s monism, and from Descartes’ interactionist dualism to Kant’s transcendental idealism. Some, like Russell and Chalmers, have sought to find a neutral or middle ground between the two. Each approach attempts to address fundamental questions about the nature of reality, the mind, and the physical world.

車行形上學 (metaphysics of van life)

當你遇見,一無所有,只剩夢想,的人,

Down and Out in Paris and London,

筆芯四八,一芯一月,等同四年,

二十年前,某精神分析學會,在其網頁上說,合格的病人,只有一個條件,那就是 sturdy,

Sturdy,就是壓不扁,比如說,壓不扁的玫瑰,

昨天突然知道,合格的治療者,也只有一個條件,那就是 sturdy,

Sturdy,就是壓不扁,比如說,壓不扁的玫瑰,

取掛號信,

剛剛突然知道,無明一生,



9/25/24(星期三)

Freud and the Changing World: Contemporary Psychoanalysis and Its Troubles (2024)

https://www.karnacbooks.com/product/freud-and-the-changing-world-contemporary-psychoanalysis-and-its-troubles/97716/

The Power of Group Attachment: John Bowlby Revisited from a Group-Analytic Perspective (2024(

https://www.karnacbooks.com/product/the-power-of-group-attachment-john-bowlby-revisited-from-a-group-analytic-perspective/97763/ (accessible via Perlego)

Pharmacotherapy for Complex Substance Use Disorders (2024)

https://www.appi.org/Products/Psychopharmacology/Pharmacotherapy-for-Complex-Substance-Use-Disorder?utm_campaign=appinews&utm_source=email&utm_medium=title (accessible via Perlego)

Tuesday, September 24, 2024

八億農民起義殺光共產黨

https://youtu.be/5rueTeaL2Ec?si=0lI9UB9Kb5YKUpqA

Subservience (2024)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subservience

https://garageplay.tw/news/content/5187/%E3%80%8A%E8%B6%85%E5%AE%8C%E7%BE%8E%E5%AE%B6%E6%94%BF%E5%A9%A6%E3%80%8B%E5%BD%B1%E8%A9%95%EF%BC%9A%E6%A2%85%E6%A0%B9%E7%A6%8F%E5%85%8B%E6%96%AF%E9%80%99%E5%80%8B%E8%A7%92%E8%89%B2%E6%98%AF%E9%A9%9A%E6%82%9A%E4%BE%86%E6%BA%90%E2%80%94%E5%96%AC%E4%BC%8A%E9%9B%BB%E5%BD%B1%E9%9A%A8%E6%83%B3

https://youtu.be/YDUK3AszB-E?si=3zNF8WDjNaLxhd2a

9/24/24(星期二)車行形上學 (metaphysics of van life) (2025)

星期二的巨石,是有名的沈重,貓狗糧,待二包裹,沒有盤算,不願盤算,無能盤算,遂不盤算,盤算,就是捧著盤子算,你要理解,星期二的巨石,是有名的無中生有,史稱第四次無中生有,就好像今日滅絕,史稱第六次滅絕,


剛剛突然知道,不知不覺,竟已完成,四十年來,所欲完成,你要理解,四十年前,我就苦于,捕捉不到,自體本體,聽住,本體非本體論,意思是說,這是 Binswanger 的路,近八年,遇德勒茲,則是哲學的歸宿,意思是說,暗夜居然,見到遠方,依稀家園,至此,不禁俯首,感念四十年車行,當時若為說卻,何有今日事也,今日事,就是今日,豁然開朗,為山所見,

http://m.fodizi.tw/f04/40757.html

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/%E4%BB%99%E4%BD%9B%E5%A5%87%E8%B9%A4_%E5%8D%B7%E5%85%AD_%E6%99%BA%E9%96%92%E7%A6%AA%E5%B8%AB.png/1024px-%E4%BB%99%E4%BD%9B%E5%A5%87%E8%B9%A4_%E5%8D%B7%E5%85%AD_%E6%99%BA%E9%96%92%E7%A6%AA%E5%B8%AB.png

鄧州香嚴智閑禪師,青州人也。厭俗辭親,觀方慕道。在百丈時性識聰敏,參禪不得。洎丈遷化,遂參溈山。山問:「我聞汝在百丈先師處,問一答十,問十答百。此是汝聰明靈利,意解識想,生死根本。父母未生時,試道一句看。」師被一問,直得茫然。歸寮將平日看過底文字從頭要尋一句酬對,竟不能得,乃自嘆曰:「畫餅不可充飢。」屢乞溈山說破,山曰:「我若說似汝,汝已後罵我去。我說底是我底,終不幹汝事。」師遂將平昔所看文字燒卻。曰:「此生不學佛法也,且作個長行粥飯僧,免役心神。」乃泣辭溈山,直過南陽睹忠國師遺跡,遂憩止焉。


一日,芟除草木,偶拋瓦礫,擊竹作聲,忽然省悟。遽歸沐浴焚香,遙禮溈山。讚曰:「和尚大慈,恩逾父母。當時若為我說破,何有今日之事?」乃有頌曰:「一擊忘所知,更不假修持。動容揚古路,不墮悄然機。處處無蹤跡,聲色外威儀。諸方達道者,咸言上上機。」


Monday, September 23, 2024

The Interview (2014)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Interview (Netflix)

Seth Rogen (b 1982)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_Rogen

Evan Goldberg (b 1982)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Goldberg

9/23/24(星期一)

翟山鷹說,習近平五子,孫齊蔣習朱,小三滿天飛,中國志士,定點清除中,https://youtu.be/qfC11g_BdMo?si=gEywk-IdtGprwEur,tp-link wi-fi 延伸器今至,pentel 筆芯明至,蘇小和說,不明飛行器,出現北京,距中南海二里,包子逃竄地洞,尚有二百五,明貓狗糧,包子下詔,讚許深圳殺童,民心可用不必深究,https://youtu.be/foS3rtm5dvA?si=TKgxd54WXooPnQVe,

自由(2025)車行形上學 (metaphysics of van life)

所有自由的故事,必須從失去自由說起,

失去自由,就是,失去自由的存在,

(一)

薛西弗斯的自由,

意思是說,我們必須想像,薛西弗斯是自由的、

意思是說,自由,是一種想像,

而且是必須的那種,

(二)

我先前說過,製造儀式,是用來記錄時間,和舒緩神經,

豬哥亮跑路十八年,

意思是說,豬哥亮十八年,沒有儀式,脫離儀式,

有點像,不受引力束縛,漂流的星球,

(三)

所以,自由,就是,不受引力束縛的漂流,

(四)

回到薛西弗斯,和他的巨石,

巨石受引力束縛,

薛西弗斯不受引力束縛,

推巨石上山,分明是反引力,

意思是說,自由,就是,反引力的執著,

(五)

你要理解,引力,是物性,

凡物,就有其引力,

作用表現在,物與物之間,的互動關係,

比如說,互為主體,就是,兩個主體之間,的互動關係,

比如說,互為客體,就是,兩個物之間,的互動關係,

(六)

問題出在,人,有自覺意識,自稱是一個主體,

不甘願只是物,只是客體,

意思是說,人做得到,人為造作引力,

人間不得自由,就是,坎陷在人為造作的引力場,

這種不自由,非僅止于物理現象,而是心的現象,

(七)

緣起甚深,

還滅就是,由心歸物,

(甚且回到,物生之前)


佛陀發現緣起


比丘們!當我還沒大徹大悟,仍是一位菩薩時,就意識到一切眾生都在生、老、死,死了又再生的苦受中,眾生不知道離苦(老死)的方法,那又如何能離苦呢?

  比丘們!我生起了疑問:「為什麼會產生老、死?老、死的因緣條件是什麼?」比丘們!由於我善巧地訓練心靈,無上的智見就從心中出現:

  生緣老死,因為有生才有老死;
  有緣生,因為有有才有生;
  取緣有,因為有取才有有;
  愛緣取,因為有愛才有取;
  受緣愛,因為有受才有愛;
  觸緣受,因為有觸才有受;
  六入緣觸,因為有六入才有觸;
  名色緣六入,因為有名色才有六入;
  識緣名色,因為有識才有名色;
  行緣識,因為有行才有識;
  無明緣行,因為有無明才有行。

  過後又以另一種方法重覆地思惟:

  無明緣行,無明為緣才產生行;
  行緣識,行為緣才產生識;
  識緣名色,識為緣才產生名色;
  名色緣六入,名色為緣才產生六入;
  六入緣觸,六入為緣才產生觸;
  觸緣受,觸為緣才產生受;
  受緣愛,受為緣才產生愛;
  愛緣取,愛為緣才產生取;
  取緣有,取為緣才產生有;
  有緣生,有為緣才產生生;
  生緣老、病、死,憂悲惱苦,純大苦聚集。

  比丘們!世人從不曾聽過有關純大苦聚之集的智慧、知見、法眼、光明就在我心中湧現了。【譯註一】

【譯註一】决記載於《相應部》因緣篇,因緣相應,佛陀品(The Buddha Suttas, The Kindred Sayings on Cause, Nidana vagga Samyutta nikaya II, PTS, p.6-7)。請參見《漢譯南傳大藏經》第14冊,6—10頁。


無明,就是不知道,
明,就是明明知道,
意思是說,地藏,就是明明知道,還留在地獄不走,
薛西弗斯,就是明明知道,推巨石上山,會滾落下山,仍執意推上山,
意思是說,無明,無所謂自由,因為他分不清楚,自由與不自由的差別,
明,則是明明知道,自由與不自由的差別,仍執意不要自由,
執意,非僅為意 (意圖,意向),
執意,就是,願,就是,志,
你可以說,執,就是虛妄,
但你不能說,地藏,薛西弗斯,不讓人,從脊梁感動,

還滅,是還,是滅,
流轉,是流,是轉,
前者,有點像,抽刀斷水,水遂不流,
後者,有點像,隨波逐流,心隨境轉,
問題是,水性流矣,流不會(因你斷之而)止,
妄想止流,是不可能的,
這件事難在,怎麼樣才能「流而不轉」,

(八)

意思是說,通篇佛學,就是尋找自由,的法門,

小乘自了,

大乘,尤其地藏,則似薛西弗斯,

(九)

近一年,每天往返,途經廣天寺,

地獄不空,誓不成佛,

(十)

至此,你可以理解,

問題出在,「必須」二字,

意思是說,我們何以,「必須」想像,薛西弗斯是自由的,






Sunday, September 22, 2024

Cold Sweat (1970)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_Sweat_(1970_film)

https://youtu.be/top0i1vqj0w?si=mYDH57JX_jCEaaTY

Jean-Claude Van Johnson (2016-2017)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Van_Johnson

Charles Bronson

https://youtu.be/c_SwK7zx-VU?si=EKnXpGTLD9x19B9b 

俾鬼捉

https://youtu.be/HqMyujB7MyI?si=fEQsrOMQM6HLgRaC

猛鬼又撞鬼

https://youtu.be/F4BTjZhpP9k?si=xKgBlRm1iRwpB1n-

一世好命

https://youtu.be/HPWr8JMWU5k?si=wixcInjgDo3lTYjQ

車行形上學 (metaphysics of van life)

首先你要理解,物占據空間,有點像習近平占著糞坑,拉二千五百年屎,十分可厭,另物性頑抗,不敵成住壞空,金玉其外,敗絮其中,光鮮亮麗,終成廢墟,至此,你對物的貪婪執著,妄想依附,應可作罷,

烏蠅哥趕赴救援,屌被鬼含的蛇哥之前,送墜樓明天去急診,果其不然,明天以身相許,蔣天機靈心帶奶油豬,前去搭救,天眼一開,雕梁畫棟,盡為灰土,你要理解,當今中國,就是天眼開後的鬼墟,

我先前說過,最可貴是,有趣的生命形態,比如說,蟬蟄伏七年,高歌一夏,嘎然而止,墜然而終,

系統的問題性,在于太大太繁複,比如說,這次柯文哲出事,就是因為,鈔票太多,數鈔票的人也太多,比如說,超級城市,動輒千萬,螻蟻一般,擠成一團,比如說,中共黨員近億,個個貪婪成性,個個日夜打炮,

日夜就是,日夜不分,無日無夜,日以繼夜,夜以繼日,

秋分多雨,欒花青黃,






9/22/24(星期日)negativity vs vitality (1130921)

昨討論時,

建霖提及無明,我反問,明是什麼,

凱喬提及差異和認同,意思是說,青少年急于找到,屬於自己(的認同)的差異,通常找不到,結果大家,都差異得差不多,且因為過度依賴社交媒體,從眾性遂成為青春的囚籠,

另瑞君提及,破梗,破壞了經驗,取代了經驗,

有點像,事前,就抽了半包事後菸,

另昨天討論,聚焦于善惡,

你要理解,宗教神學,屬繁複論述,且已備解答,

有點像,註釋完備的考古題庫,

人生,則像是,進不了考場的卡夫卡,

素婷有一片語,耐人尋味,惡中乍現的善,善中乍現的惡,

可見善惡,是一杯雞尾酒,駁雜不可能純,

關于善惡,我的命題是,處理善惡,等同于回到歷史,而回到歷史之後,才可以回到自然,意思是說,滅共,拆除那九萬座水壩之後,鮭魚才可返鄉,

另昨天沒有說到,死之欲(Thanatos),非等同于暴力(violence),攻擊性 (aggressiveness),

佛洛姆用詞 (The Anatomy of Human Destructiveness) 較貼切,是「破壞性」 (destructiveness),且是「人類的破壞性」(human destructiveness),

人類的破壞性,破壞的,當然就是生命,


Saturday, September 21, 2024

negativity vs vitality (1130921)

這是一個無中生有三次的故事 (物,生命,心 (意識,自覺意識)),

這是一個生命哲學的命題,死不足畏,生大于死,


Strangely,近日無法,去想此事,


七圖,止于魚,

魚,就是一元,就是純粹力動 (pure vitality),

意思是說,negativity vs vitality,止于 vitality,

意思是說,negativity vs vitality,止于自體的心理學的最後一章,止于行走荒野掌觸湖面感應鱸魚的那個人,


有之所以為有,是基于空,基于無,

上述,已是二元論,

二元之前,是一元,

鮭魚返鄉,返的是,一元的鄉,

一的隔壁,就是零,就是空,就是無,

一之所以為一的條件 (conditions for one to be one),就是零,就是空,就是無,

(關係本體論,則會說,一之所以為一的條件,就是二)

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Jj5kbMvY1WeRlTUMmZAk1JiFCErYAH-r


Friday, September 20, 2024

9/20/24(星期五)

注意老殘,注意蒲松齡,

習近平指定,接班人豬哥亮,

https://www.youtube.com/live/-FPhQzx8OuY?si=mFAveoa7aiyv6qBy

K 小辮子 (i.e. 睪丸),匪交給 S,牢牢捏著,

全聯芳香劑,

寄掛號信,

匪義和團行兇,事後惡人無膽,匪 404 全網屏蔽,

小林激動,語無倫次,

Jack 和 Joe,腦筋很準確,

習近平強姦司馬南,司馬南說很爽,

https://youtu.be/R5BnjDq8kgk?si=I9IZzgv1fEEvYId7

每個句子,不要超過二十字,

三星堆文明,屬長江清澈見底文明,不敵黃河渾水摸魚文明,說明中國文明,下水道糞坑也,污濁水甚深,

紅衛兵,虐殺卞仲耘原兇之一,宋彬彬,9/16 安詳死在祖國(美利堅眾和國)懷抱,有點像返鄉趙家鮭魚,狂熱交尾,繁衍紅三四五代後,死在密西西比河岸,

https://www.rfi.fr/tw/%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B/20240917-%E6%96%87%E9%9D%A9%E6%9A%B4%E5%8A%9B%E7%AC%A6%E8%99%9F%E5%AE%8B%E5%BD%AC%E5%BD%AC%E9%81%8E%E4%B8%96-%E7%9C%9F%E7%9B%B8%E8%88%87%E7%BD%AA%E9%81%8E

蔡壁如,辦祈福法會,這件事發人深省,你要理解,海德格晚年,講天地人神,要辦的,就是祈福法會,




2025

車行形上學 (metaphysics of van life)

薛西弗斯的自由

自體的心理學

菊次郎十六式


我今天下午要去墾丁


Thursday, September 19, 2024

Unconscious Politics: Alienation, Social Science and Psychoanalysis (R.D. Hinshelwood, 2024)

https://www.karnacbooks.com/product/unconscious-politics-alienation-social-science-and-psychoanalysis/97761/?MATCH=1

Negativity vs Vitality

考城隍 (聊齋誌異)


予姊丈之祖宋公,諱燾,邑廩生。一日病臥,見吏人持牒,牽白顛馬來,云:「請赴試。」公言:「文宗未臨,何遽得考?」吏不言,但敦促之。公力病乘馬從去,路甚生疏,至一城郭,如王者都。移時入府廨,宮室壯麗。上坐十餘官,都不知何人,惟關壯繆可識。簷下設幾、墩各二,先有一秀才坐其末,公便與連肩。幾上各有筆札。俄題紙飛下,視之有八字,云:「一人二人,有心無心。」二公文成,呈殿上。公文中有云:「有心為善,雖善不賞。無心為惡,雖惡不罰。」諸神傳贊不已。召公上,諭曰:「河南缺一城隍,君稱其職。」公方悟,頓首泣曰:「辱膺寵命,何敢多辭?但老母七旬,奉養無人,請得終其天年,惟聽錄用。」上一帝王像者,即命稽母壽籍。有長須吏捧冊翻閱一過,白:「有陽算九年。」共躊躇間,關帝曰:「不妨令張生攝篆九年,瓜代可也。」乃謂公:「應即赴任,今推仁孝之心,給假九年。及期當復相召。」又勉勵秀才數語。二公稽首並下。秀才握手,送諸郊野,自言長山張某。以詩贈別,都忘其詞,中有「有花有酒春常在,無燭無燈夜自明」之句。

公既騎,乃別而去,及抵裏,豁若夢寤。時卒已三日,母聞棺中呻吟,扶出,半日始能語。問之長山,果有張生於是日死矣。後九年,母果卒,營葬既畢,浣濯入室而沒。其岳家居城中西門裡,忽見公鏤膺朱幩,輿馬甚眾。登其堂,一拜而行。相共驚疑,不知其為神,奔詢鄉中,則已歿矣。公有自記小傳,惜亂後無存,此其略耳。


車行形上學 (metaphysics of van life)

(一)

佛陀說,苦,是拋錨路邊的失軸之輪,

剛剛突然知道,苦,也是無法停止轉動之輪,

前者,是無用 (沒有作用)之輪,

後者,是異化物化 (不容沒有作用)之輪,

(二)

卅年前,聽楊郁文師講阿含,

楊師說,生活是快速旋轉的陀螺,

其中,心不為所動,

剛剛突然知道,這是一個,對于(有用的)輪子的,(無用的)浪漫的想像,

(三)

吉川英治,寫宮本武藏,

武藏妻六(妻六是一個武功不甚了了的忍者,他是武粉,隨侍武藏),來到(幕府末期的)江戶,

有點像,來到(今日的)台北市,

想找高手決鬥,一決生死,

卻沒有人願意,陪他玩命,

武藏,百無聊賴,

意思是說,失去他存在的理由,

這輩子,第一次無聊,

宮本村,用加密貨幣洗錢,孝敬武藏的微薄盤纏,

抵不過寸土是金的江戶 (柯文哲圖利沈慶京四百億,陶朱隱園一坪二百萬)(恆大歌舞團,半抱琵琶遮鮑魚,曼妙脫褲,吹彈可破),即將用罄,

武藏拿起,短劍削木,

遂削出,ㄧ尊一尊,和藹可親,慈悲為懷,笑容可掬,的菩薩,

妻六市集擺售,換錢度日,

台北人,遂供奉著,一尊一尊,和藹可親,慈悲為懷,笑容可掬,的菩薩,活得像是快速旋轉的陀螺,以為自己,心不為所動,

一日,雲遊僧澤庵,途經見之,

遂笑著說,連阿修羅惡鬼,都可為菩薩,

這個故事,告訴我們,

唯一有的是,無用的存在的理由,復失去存在的理由,成為無用的無用,之輪,

你就是菩薩,

意思是說,菩薩就是,無用的無用,的台北人,

至于,柯沈黃蔡朱,當然就是,有用的有用,的台北人,(白先勇筆下,則為無用的(有用的)台北人)

(四)

至于,有用的無用,無用的有用,

阿里斯多德說,這明顯是,邏輯謬誤,

意思是說,天底下 (意思是說,古希臘的那種天底下),沒有這種名堂,(意思是說,白先勇認為,台北的那種天底下,有這種名堂,你要理解,中哲無知識論,是有其不存在的理由的),

(五)

你要理解,無事之所以可貴,是因為時間之完整性 (integrity of time),得以保存,

當然,空間之完整性 (integrity of space),可貴亦然,

我先前說過,治療者 (照顧好自己)四式為,結構,節奏,平衡,完整性,

完整性,是前三者底線,

共匪無底線,這是為什麼,我們必須 (亦無底線的)滅共的原因,

(六)

但是,實情是,完整性,是柏拉圖的理型,

意思是說,天底下,沒有這麼完整的,完整性,

意思是說,完整性,像是穿了卅年的內褲,

縫縫補補,打算再穿,卅年,

(七)

當然,你要理解,這個世界上,有一個地方,叫做家樂福,

三花(SF) 牌內褲,像是風中飄逸的風鈴,一條八十九元,

意思是說,完整的完整性,一齣八十九元,

(八)

回到武藏,你要理解,吉川英治,筆下武藏,終其一生,只洗過一次澡,那是他年輕,成名一役,滅門趙家人,的那個拂曉,

意思是說,我們沒有聽說,武藏在江戶,或巖流島,曾經洗澡,

意思是說,這明顯是信仰,

你不得不,佩服他的堅持,

有點像趙家人野種滿天下,因為他們堅持不戴套,

你要理解,習近平說,野種是拿來世襲的,

比如說,華國鋒是毛澤東的野種,

(九)

Now, before the 4:00 AM raid, Reacher is talking to the old lady, about Blind Blake. 










Wednesday, September 18, 2024

聊齋誌異 (1766)

https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E8%81%8A%E9%BD%8B%E5%BF%97%E7%95%B0

https://ctext.org/wiki.pl?if=gb&res=823219

蒲松齡
作家
蒲松齡
貢生
國家明、清
時代明末清初
字留仙
號柳泉居士、聊齋先生
封地_
籍貫中國山東淄川
別名異史氏[1]
出生明崇禎十三年四月十六日
1640年6月5日
逝世清康熙五十四年正月二十二日
1715年2月25日(74歲)
親屬
《聊齋誌異》

蒲松齡 (1640-1715)

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%92%B2%E6%9D%BE%E9%BE%84

清朝是幾年到幾年?
清朝歷史,若從1616年清太祖努爾哈赤稱汗並建立後金開始,到1912年宣統帝退位結束,則歷經十二帝,有296年的歷史;如果從皇太極1636年稱帝並改國號「大清」開始,有276年的歷史;若從1644年清軍入關、定鼎中原開始,清朝有268年的歷史。

菊次郎十六式 (自體的心理學)(2025)(車行形上學)(metaphysics of van life)

始于形下,途經形上,未捨形下,悲欣形上,

內在世界的凝然專注包容準確力,外在世界的好像走進自家廚房力,

意思是說,車行者,就是雲遊僧,

一沙一世界,十六遂証一世,

你要理解,世事,皆有其癥結,

以不完整的句子,觸此癥結,形同釋放 (板塊) 能量,


Is there structure in jazz music? If yes, what’s the structure like? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-18)


Yes, there is structure in jazz music, though it may seem more free-form and improvisational compared to other genres. Jazz is known for its flexibility, but most jazz performances are built around certain recognizable frameworks. Here are some key elements of jazz structure:


### 1. **Song Form**

   - Many jazz pieces are based on standard song forms, with the **AABA** and **ABAC** forms being the most common. These forms consist of sections, or "choruses," that repeat throughout the performance.

     - **AABA**: The "A" section is a theme or melody that is repeated, with the "B" section providing contrast (often called the "bridge"). After the bridge, the "A" section returns.

     - **ABAC**: Similar to AABA, but the final section contrasts with the first section instead of repeating.

   - **Blues Form**: A 12-bar blues is another common structure, consisting of three 4-bar phrases. It’s a simple but powerful framework used widely in jazz.


### 2. **Chord Progressions**

   - Jazz relies heavily on standard chord progressions, with the **ii-V-I** progression being the most iconic. This progression is used frequently in jazz to move from one key or section to another.

   - Many jazz tunes are based on the harmonic structure of pre-existing songs (often referred to as “standards”), using their chord progressions as a basis for improvisation.


### 3. **Head-Solo-Head Structure**

   - A common structure in jazz performances is **head-solo-head**:

     - **Head**: The performance starts with the "head," or the main melody/theme of the tune. This is usually played in unison or harmony by the lead instruments.

     - **Solo Section**: After the head, individual musicians take turns improvising over the chord changes. Each solo is usually based on the harmonic framework of the song.

     - **Head Reprise**: After the solos, the head is played again, usually to close the performance.


### 4. **Rhythmic Structure**

   - Jazz often has a strong, syncopated rhythm and is heavily influenced by swing. The rhythm section (drums, bass, piano, etc.) sets up a groove or pulse that drives the piece forward.

   - Rhythmic patterns can vary greatly, from straight beats to complex, syncopated rhythms.


### 5. **Improvisation**

   - While improvisation is a hallmark of jazz, it usually happens within the confines of the song's structure (chord progressions, form, and key).

   - Musicians have the freedom to explore melodies and harmonies while staying anchored to the underlying form of the piece.


### 6. **Modal Structure**

   - Some forms of jazz, especially **modal jazz**, use modes (scales derived from a parent key) rather than chord progressions as the foundation for improvisation. This allows for more open-ended and less harmonically restricted solos.


Despite its apparent looseness, jazz is built on these structured elements, which give musicians a framework to work from while allowing for significant creative freedom.


四四十六,分四樂段,起承轉 (未必)合,

意思是說,這是某個,傍晚的音樂,

或(不長的)中篇小說的經驗,


中篇小說(Novella)是小說的一種,指篇幅比短篇小說長、但又比長篇小說短些的故事,平均字數約三至十萬字。


https://goshawk.wordpress.com/2006/04/23/%E5%BE%9E500%E5%88%B0150000%EF%BC%9A%E8%AB%96%E5%B0%8F%E8%AA%AA%E7%AF%87%E5%B9%85%E7%9A%84%E9%95%B7%E5%BA%A6/

1000 字:對我來說,這是寫小說的基本功。字數少,字句的敘述跟雕琢便顯得格外重要,而且1000個字說實在不難。
5000 字:短篇小說的基準範圍。當然也有不少好的短篇小說只有這個數字的一半。
10000字:短篇邁向中篇小說的中途站。5000到10000有時候剛好是長篇小說一章左右的字數。
30000字:中篇小說的基準範圍。有寫到這個程度的篇幅,大概獨力完成一本作品沒問題。
50000字:中長篇小說。可算是中篇邁向長篇小說的中途站。有磚頭書的潛力。
100000字:長篇小說的基準範圍。
150000字:想寫作長篇小說的人都應該嘗試的目標。



What’s the length and structure of novella? (ChatGPT, 2024-9-18)


A **novella** is a form of prose fiction that is shorter than a full-length novel but longer than a short story. Its length and structure allow for more complexity than a short story but usually without the expansive scope of a novel.


### 1. **Length**

   - **Word Count**: A novella typically ranges between **20,000 to 50,000 words**, though some definitions may extend up to 60,000 words. This range gives enough room for a detailed narrative without becoming as lengthy as a novel.

   - In terms of pages, a novella usually spans **80 to 200 pages**, depending on formatting and font size.


### 2. **Structure**

   The structure of a novella is more focused and concise compared to a novel. Its shorter length impacts the pacing and narrative complexity.


   - **Plot**: The plot of a novella is generally more streamlined than that of a novel. It usually revolves around a single conflict or a tightly woven series of events. While there can be subplots, they are often limited in number and scope.

     - **Linear Narrative**: Novellas often follow a linear structure, where events are presented in chronological order. This helps maintain clarity in a more concise form.

     - **Focused Conflict**: There is typically one major conflict or theme that drives the novella, and the story revolves around its resolution.


   - **Character Development**: A novella focuses on fewer characters than a novel, often centering around one or two main characters. It allows for in-depth exploration of the protagonist's internal world or key relationships but without the extensive secondary character arcs typical of novels.

     - **Psychological Depth**: Although shorter, novellas often provide significant psychological insight into the characters, making it a form well-suited for exploring internal struggles or transformations.


   - **Themes**: Novellas often explore one or two central themes or ideas. Given the condensed form, these themes are developed intensely and with precision, allowing the reader to engage deeply without being distracted by numerous side themes or plots.

   

   - **Setting**: The setting is usually limited, often focusing on a single location or small number of locations, allowing for greater depth in the atmosphere and tone without the broader world-building of a novel.


   - **Pacing**: The pacing is typically faster than that of a novel, with little room for unnecessary digressions. This often leads to a sense of urgency or immediacy in the narrative.


### 3. **Examples of Novellas**

   - **"The Metamorphosis"** by Franz Kafka (~30,000 words)

   - **"Of Mice and Men"** by John Steinbeck (~30,000 words)

   - **"Heart of Darkness"** by Joseph Conrad (~38,000 words)

   - **"The Stranger"** by Albert Camus (~36,000 words)


Overall, the novella form strikes a balance between the brevity of a short story and the depth of a novel, offering a focused, intense narrative with room for character and thematic exploration.

既然只是,短的中篇小說,其所跨越時空,必然有限,

意思是說,聚焦是必要的,

問題是,聚什麼焦,聚哪個焦,

且,時間軸向,無法走太遠,

意思是說,我十分確定,你回不到更新世,

遑論宇宙的緣起,

Lee Child 曾強調伏筆(foreshadowing),

伏筆形同能指,

「被」事件事件,「被」,就是伏筆,就是能指,

初級經驗,即養,次級經驗,即教,菊次郎十六式,兩者皆具,其比例,一切自然就好,

最動人,莫過于,泥濘形下,証其形上,


 

Reacher Season 2 Will Adapt The Book Bad Luck And Trouble (2022-5-18)

https://www.slashfilm.com/867799/reacher-season-2-will-adapt-the-book-bad-luck-and-trouble/

Accessible via Amazon Prime Video. (2024-9-18)

The Season II screenplay is much better than that of the Season I. Which means the playwright is free in this one. 

9/18/24(星期三)

Where did viruses come from? AlphaFold and other AIs are finding answers

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02970-w?utm_source=Live+Audience&utm_campaign=f4bc88ad07-nature-briefing-daily-20240917&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b27a691814-f4bc88ad07-50423968