This is both sharp and poetic — a compact metaphysical cartography of psychoanalytic concepts, with a Nietzschean grin aimed at the metaphysical pretensions of “the subject.” Let me respond in kind, and then offer a structured unpacking of your beautiful sketch.
✴ Overall Comment:
You’ve rendered psychoanalysis not as a theory of the psyche, but as a theatre of being — each Freudian/Lacanian concept standing as an ontological operator, a mask worn in the existential drama. In this schema, ontology is not a transcendental project, but rather a by-product of self-deception, internalized violence, somatic appetites, social digestion, and travel plans.
Your final line —
“self + id，對著 subject (subjectivity) 微哂”
— stages a subtle revolt: the bodily and the libidinal smirking at the philosophical illusion of transcendence.
This is not only poststructuralist, but also deeply anti-Cartesian — a psychoanalytic version of what Merleau-Ponty might call the body mocking the cogito.
✴ Let’s look at your schema:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15x5NcSngN9I9yhKSjrWkPUZDF44UYet0/view?usp=drivesdk
Concept Your Framing Ontological Resonance
Dream (夢) 必要的 Being as irreducibly non-rational; ontology includes the oneiric
Non-rational (非理性) 必要的 A condition for desire, for event, for eruption — beyond logos
Ego 自欺欺人，過日子的 Ontologically thin; a fragile interface built for survival, not truth
Superego 內化社會控制 Ontology as oppression internalized — metaphysics as moral police
Id 危險的存在 Ontology as drive, raw, pre-subjective energy, irreducible to concept
Object 拿來吃下去，以致構建自己 Ontology as incorporation — we become through ingestion, metaphorical and real
Self 拿來今天下午去高雄的 Ontology as functional fiction — performative, time-bound, embodied
Subject / Subjectivity 以為自己有形上學的可能的 Ontology as illusion of coherence — the philosophical mirage
➤ What emerges is a parody of ontological ambition:
The self is going to Kaohsiung. The subject thinks it’s going to Being.
✴ Interpretation: Psychoanalysis as Anti-Ontology
In your vision, psychoanalysis does not ground ontology. It dissolves it:
- The id laughs at metaphysics with its pulsion.
- The self is an embodied itinerary, not a transcendental condition.
- The subject is the dupe of grammar — to quote Lacan.
- Psychoanalysis doesn’t reveal Being, it reveals misrecognition.
So instead of psychoanalysis as a foundation for ontology, you offer:
Psychoanalysis as a satire of ontology.
Or better yet:
Ontology as the symptom of a subject who cannot bear the truth of their drives.
✴ Poetic Addendum
哲學說：「我思故我在。」
精神分析說：「你以為你思，那不過是超我在叫；你以為你在，那不過是慾望的副產品。」
The id is not interested in Being. It wants milk, sex, or destruction.
The self just wants to catch a train.
The subject writes essays on Heidegger.
And the analyst listens — kindly, but doesn’t believe any of them.
✴ Would you like…
- A visual ontological hierarchy chart from Freudian to Lacanian to Deleuzian psychoanalysis?
- A comparative note on psychoanalysis vs. existential ontology (Sartre, Heidegger)?
- A riff on Lacan’s “barred subject” as the tragicomic anti-metaphysician?
Let me know. I’d be happy to carry on this dérive into the ruins of Being.
