Tuesday, September 13, 2022

Margaret Singer (1921-2003) (Cult) (2022-9-21)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Singer#Books

Cults in Our Midst: The Hidden Menace in Our Everyday Lives (1995) is a study of cults by Margaret Singer and Janja Lalich, Ph.D., with a foreword by Robert Jay Lifton.

Overview[edit]

Singer writes:

In this book I will use the term cult and cultic group to refer to any one of a large number of groups that have sprung up in our society and that are similar in the way that they originate, their power structure, and their governance. Cults range from the relatively benign to those that exercise extraordinary control over members' lives and use thought-reform processes to influence and control members. While the conduct of certain cults causes nonmembers to criticize them, the term cult is not in itself pejorative but simply descriptive. It denotes a group that forms around a person who claims to have a special mission or knowledge, which they will share with those who turn over most of their decision making to that self-appointed leader.[1]

In 2003 a revised edition of the book titled Cults in Our Midst: The Continuing Fight Against Their Hidden Menace was published in paperback form by John Wiley & Sons, without Janja Lalich listed as co-author. 


Harassment and death threat complaints[edit]

Singer faced harassment, including death threats and dead animals placed on her doorstep, from groups that disagreed with her views on cults.[4][7] According to Richard Behar's article in Time magazine, Singer was an outspoken critic of Scientologyand was known to travel under an assumed name to avoid harassment.[30]

Her criticism of cults and their brainwashing tactics resulted in harassment of Singer's family and students as well, including breaking into Singer's office, stealing students' term papers and sending notes to Singer's students.[9] According to the Los Angeles Times, other examples included cult "operatives" going through Singer's trash and mail, picketing her lectures, hacking into her computer, and releasing live rats in her house.[4][30]

Grace for the Injured Self: The Healing Approach of Heinz Kohut (Terry D. Cooper, 2011) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Terry-D-Cooper/dp/1608998398/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= (accessible via Scribd)

粗工粗活 (2022-9-14)

2002 年,我說,我是帶著幾個命題,和片段的回憶來的,2022 年今天,我依然如此,意思是說,這是粗工的粗活,不是細緻的雕梁,你要理解,每天洗五千個碗的洗碗工,一切都是大概,然後呼呼大睡,醒來又是一天,又是五千個碗,你要理解,薛西弗斯亦然,只能寫意山水,畫不了工筆,

The Forward Edge, Connectedness, and the Therapeutic Process (Richard A. Geist, 2011) (2022-9-14)

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15551024.2011.552178

The Origins of the Leading Edge in Kohut's Work (Peter Zimmermann, Harry Paul, 2021) (2022-9-14)

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33999706/

Using Forward and Trailing Edge Perspectives in Working with Dyads (2016) (2022-9-14)

https://www.trisp.org/2016/04/29/using-forward-and-trailing-edge-perspectives-in-working-with-dyads/


前緣 forward edge

後緣 trailing edge

The forward edge transference within self-psychology and the activation of inborn capacity through interpretation and internalization (Zelda G. Knight, 2021) (2022-9-14)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8715267/

Mahler and Kohut: Perspectives on Development, Psychopathology, and Technique (Selma Kramer, 1977) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/Mahler-Kohut-Perspectives-Development-Psychopathology/dp/1568217854 (e-text not available)

Exploring the Life of the Soul: Philosophical Reflections on Psychoanalysis and Self Psychology (John Hanwell Riker, 2017) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/John-Hanwell-Riker/dp/1498543901/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1663060724&sr=1-1 (e-text not available)

Self Psychology: Comparisons and Contrasts (ed. Douglas Detrick, Susan Detrick, Arnold Goldberg, 1989) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Douglas-Detrick/dp/0881630772/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr= (e-text not available, except kindle)

精神分析的歷史就是廿世紀的歷史嗎 (2022-9-14)

我希望是,結果當然不是,且不說精神分析,強調童年,六歲看一生,意思是說,六歲以後的你,確定是白活了,

所以它,永遠遲到,至少廿年,

但我估計,事實上,它遲到,恐怕至少五十年,

意思是說,它有一種奇特的關起門來,自說自話,的本事,好像窗外,這個世界,還在十九世紀末,

這種掩耳盜鈴的自我欺瞞 (self deception) 的功夫,爐火純青,讓人十分驚駭,

為什麼,會有如此,不可思議的,與歷史脫節,

我想,是因為,它以為,它是普世的,

意思是說,超越了時空,和文化差異的限制,古今中外,舉世皆然的,

所以,這個脫節,是因為,它以為自己是自然科學,

比如說,你要想想,oedipus complex,為什麼這麼頑強,你就知道,你非宣稱,你也有這個情結不可,否則你就不是有教養的人,

而,我要問的是,oedipus 怎麼面對廿世紀,和廿一世紀的殺戮,


Robert Jay Lifton (b 1926) (Cult)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jay_Lifton#Bibliography

Witness to an Extreme Century: A Memoir (Robert Jay Lifton, 2011) (2022-9-14)

 https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Robert-Jay-Lifton/dp/1416590765/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1663038132&sr=1-1 (accessible via Scribd)

Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of "Brainwashing" in China (Robert Jay Lifton, 1961) (Cult)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought_Reform_and_the_Psychology_of_Totalism

Brutal Minds: The Dark World of Left-Wing Brainwashing in Our Universities (Stanley K. Ridgley, 2023) (Cult)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Stanley-K-Ridgley-Ph-D/dp/163006226X/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Brutal+Minds%3A+The+Dark+World+of+Left-Wing+Brainwashing+in+Our+Universities&qid=1663035258&s=books&sr=1-1

Dr. Robert J. Lifton - Eight Criteria for Thought Reform (Cult)

https://www.cultrecover.com/lifton8

https://freedomofmind.com/robert-jay-liftons-eight-criteria-of-thought-reform-brainwashing-mind-control/

Losing Reality: On Cults, Cultism, and the Mindset of Political and Religious Zealotry (Robert Jay Lifton, 2019) (Cult)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Robert-Jay-Lifton-ebook/dp/B07N8H4W7W/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Losing+reality&qid=1663034723&s=books&sr=1-1

How to talk someone out of a damaging cult (Cult)

https://theconversation.com/how-to-talk-someone-out-of-a-damaging-cult-68930

HOW TO ESCAPE FROM A CULT IN THE 21ST CENTURY (Cult)

https://psmag.com/news/how-to-escape-from-a-cult-in-the-21st-century

How to Get Someone Out of a Cult (Cult)

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/magazine/how-to-get-someone-out-of-a-cult.html

It’s Time To Rethink the Origins of Pain

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/it-rsquo-s-time-to-rethink-the-origins-of-pain/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=health&utm_content=link&utm_term=2022-09-12_featured-this-week&spMailingID=72069974&spUserID=MTEwMTQwMDYwODYS1&spJobID=2253857543&spReportId=MjI1Mzg1NzU0MwS2

A Safe Place: Laying the Groundwork of Psychotherapy (Leston Havens, 1989) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Leston-Havens/dp/0674000854/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

See also 

https://www.amazon.com/s?i=stripbooks&rh=p_27%3ALeston+Havens&s=relevancerank&language=zh_TW&text=Leston+Havens&ref=dp_byline_sr_book_1

一個乾淨明亮的地方 (A Clean, Well-Lighted Place) (Ernest Hemingway, 1933) (2022-9-14)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clean,_Well-Lighted_Place

https://yale.learningu.org/download/51358dbc-0c73-4e33-8cfb-967c55a621f5/H2976_Hemingway_A%20Clean%20Well%20Lighted%20Place.pdf

first published in Scribner's Magazine in 1933; it was also included in his collection Winner Take Nothing (1933).

Monday, September 12, 2022

蘇小和老師笑評李克燈老師

https://youtu.be/-vtiHFWq7xk

蘇阿姨,是我湖南老鄉,給狗屁倒灶的中國,帶來很多吃喝嫖賭操的快樂,我們十分愛戴他老人家,

Dystopia (反烏托邦) (2022-9-14)

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8F%8D%E4%B9%8C%E6%89%98%E9%82%A6

又稱反面烏托邦、敵托邦、惡托邦、絕望鄉或廢托邦)是烏托邦(utopia)的反義語,希臘語字面意思是「不好的地方」(not-good place),它是一種不得人心、令人恐懼的假想社群或社會[1][2],是與理想社會相反的,一種極端惡劣的社會最終形態。

你要理解,之所以有「反烏托邦」,是因為有「烏托邦」,意思是說,販賣烏托邦的人,正是在販賣反烏托邦,意思是說,你永遠不應相信,比生命大的 (larger than life),完美的承諾,意思是說,心理治療,治療者只能承諾,一期一會,他會在那裡,意思是說,如果他沒有在那裡,那他一定是掛了,共產主義,就是販賣烏托邦的小販,劉大任就是嘴硬的,上當的例子,陳映真也是,

Swede made two wooden forks

https://youtu.be/ro4vTW_qERg

共匪王強殺了揭竿起義的李橋銘上將

https://youtu.be/jkRU7YO4dOs

北方軍區那天不是演習是兵變

https://youtu.be/BPEyp7wFBoI

The New Class - An Analysis of the Communist System (Milovan Djilas, 1957):(2022-9-14)

https://book4you.org/book/2717688/14f0d5

Swede hiking

https://youtu.be/vfg0PCyG5IA

The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life (Norton Series on Interpersonal Neurobiology) (Daniel N. Stern, 2004) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/Present-Psychotherapy-Everyday-Interpersonal-Neurobiology/dp/0393704297 (e-text not available)

Object Relations Theory and Self Psychology in Social Work Practice (Eda G. Goldstein, 2002) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Eda-G-Goldstein/dp/068484009X/ref=sr_1_2?crid=ICO8M2UD0FTH&keywords=object+relations+and+self+psychology&qid=1662948776&s=books&sprefix=st+object+relations+and+self+psychology%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C685&sr=1-2 (e-book accessible via scribd) 

Object Relations and Self Psychology: An Introduction 4e (Michael St. Clair, Jodie Wigren, 2003) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Michael-St-Clair/dp/0534532934/ref=sr_1_1?crid=ICO8M2UD0FTH&keywords=object+relations+and+self+psychology&qid=1662948555&s=books&sprefix=st+object+relations+and+self+psychology%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C685&sr=1-1 (e-text not available)

Treating the Self: Elements of Clinical Self Psychology (Ernest S. Wolf, 1988) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Ernest-S-Wolf/dp/0898627176/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1662948123&sr=1-1 (e-text not available)


use of therapist's self (2022-9-14)

這個片語,「治療者的自己,為病人所用」,是一個檢視不同學派的關鍵,

意思是說,一人心理學,只打算提供解釋,為病人所用,一點五心理學,可能不反對,借傘給病人,二人心理學,情緒表現,會更露骨,


motocamping

https://youtu.be/Lo-A-39Yk38

Sunday, September 11, 2022

遠方只有傻逼並無風雷 (2022-9-14)

第四天,終於看完,我看的是博客來的電子書,無法確定紙本的頁數,姑且稱之為中篇,意思是說,頂多百來頁,絕對不過兩百,結果是,「不足以承擔歷史」,但是劉大任嫻熟小說筆法,所以有匆匆帶過,但似乎沒有遺漏的感覺,且關鍵處,足夠悚人,悚人的意思是說,合理的不合常理,

比如說,小吳阿貞夫妻要離婚,小組勸合不成,雷霆說把尚未出生的孩子給他們,來保他們的婚姻,雷霆的老婆,就是雷立天的母親,居然順從,但一年後突然不告而別,帶雷立天回台灣,雷霆當時是這麼說的,如果她不答應,「就殺了她」,

這四個字,就是悚人,

看起來,這些事,發生的時間是,文革開始的同時,所以林彪出事,對他們而言,才是困惑的開始,但明顯他們對文革的真相,一無所知,

當時不知,後來不知,至死不知,

意思是說,十分愚昧,

另一不可思議,八九六四前,雷霆公開場合發言說,爭自由,用勝利女神像不妥,且西方媒體,鼓吹代議民主,誤導了群眾,但是劉大任沒有說,數週後,解放軍屠殺群眾的事,雷霆又怎麼說,

意思是說,雷霆好像不知道這件事,

意思是說,其實雷霆,終其一生,作為毛左,並未幻滅,他對改革開放,是不同意的,因為那是墮落,意思是說,雷霆就是習近平,要中國人以為的純潔無私,涅槃浴火的習近平,

最扯的是,第四節,我的總結,劉大任掰的兩個理由是,時代混亂的社會實驗,和利他主義的自毀,意思是說,他對共產主義的罪惡本質,沒有反省,沒有覺悟,沒有幻滅,

沒有幻滅,還要歷史還他一個公道,或慷慨,

我要問,他的毛澤東的烏托邦,有沒有還我的舅舅一個公道,或慷慨,

我和我們之間的辯證 (2022-9-14)

遠方有風雷,還是停在第二節,母親的故事,雷立天的母親,回憶那些年,在舊金山灣區,與雷立天的父親雷霆,一起搞革命的經過,我先前說過,不忍卒讀,我想、原因是那種革命,是要求我消失於我們的革命,意思是說,是集中力量辦大事,然後,可以預見,失去了我,我不存在,我們卻又成為泡影,意思是說,我和我們都幻滅了,我先前說過,中國人五千年來無我,沒有我,沒有我做為一個個體的存在,頂多部落家族鄉里關係,牽拖來牽拖去,互相交換體液,這種沒有我的概念的我,其實是沒有資格有我們的,意思是說,我們在先,強勢管控,我更不可能萌芽了,比較好的過程,應該是,我先誕生,再看我能夠,或願意,有怎麼樣的我們,但是井岡山上,可不容許你誕生,就把你框死,這種革命,是一個巨大的黑洞,要無數生靈,無數的我,被獻祭,第四節,雷立天的總結,不知道會不會來到這個結論,

意思是說,劉大任最重要的作品,是「杜鵑啼血」,那個文革武鬥,曾經食人,因而癲狂多年,的生吃杜鵑花,好像重演,生吃愛人心臟的故事,和「走出神話國」,「神話的破滅」,「走過蛻變的中國」,還有就是,「遠方有風雷」,

意思是說,他的其他作品,都是扯扯閒篇罷了,

Robert Maxwell Young (1935-2019) (2022-9-14)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_M._Young_(academic)

Psychoanalysis, Science and Power 
Essays in Honour of Robert Maxwell Young

Edited By 

Kurt Jacobsen

, 

R. D. Hinshelwood (2023)

https://www.routledge.com/Psychoanalysis-Science-and-Power-Essays-in-Honour-of-Robert-Maxwell-Young/Jacobsen-Hinshelwood/p/book/9781032068701

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/robert-young-death-academic-science-historian-scholar-darwin-psychotherapy-psychoanalysis-a9045206.html

https://freeassociations.org.uk/FA_New/OJS/index.php/fa/article/view/365

老燈說明中共軍方反習態勢

https://youtu.be/2U_5ErN-df0

李克強公開批評習近平不顧老百姓死活

https://youtu.be/D25lxJ6_KeA

Ludovico Einaudi

https://youtu.be/f4yVH6RbcIg

Thelonious Monk Underground (1917-1982)

https://youtu.be/9BfOMRTNhZg

九月十一日 (2022)

喝「水」,家樂福,狗老闆,一條菸,藉此課程,整理回憶,意思是說,把回憶,放進整理箱 (container),你要理解,眼不見為「淨」,港媒放「假」風,說剛開的政治局會議,已將兩個確立,寫進黨章,Bion 說過,哪裡有砲火,就往哪裡去,這句話是,一戰期間,他「窩」在坦克車的鐵棺材裡,「悟」出來的,黃宗羲說,在我身下,置一青石板,意思是說,不要棺材,只要「速」朽,你要理解,殭屍是住在棺材裡的,尤其是那種,不朽的棺材,兩個維護是指,維護共產黨糟蹋中國人,維護包子是黨中央的核心,帶領共產黨糟蹋中國人,簡單講,維護黨中央權威和集中統一領導,一六年十二月,包子在中央政治局民主就是屁生活會上,一如往常,用錯別字唸稿,「黨中央的核心,全黨的核心,對我來說,就是操他媽的權力的權力,我要用畢生精力和全部生命來惡搞中國人民,和全世界人類,鞠躬盡瘁、赴湯蹈火、每日七炮,精盡人亡,萬死不辭」,兩個確立就是兩個維護,確立包子是「核心中的核心」,「精蟲中的精蟲」,「邪惡中的邪惡」,「惡搞中的惡搞」,意思是說,包秦三世暴政,就是中國人永遠的輪迴,醒不來的惡夢,還差一條菸,陣雨,

Psychoanalysis, History, and Radical Ethics: Learning to Hear (Donna Orange, 2019) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Donna-Orange/dp/0367339307/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?crid=OXCNOOCCISJG&keywords=caravan+psychoanalysis&qid=1662854223&s=books&sprefix=caravan+psychoanalysis+%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C341&sr=1-1-fkmr0 (e-text not available)

關於怎麼處理文本的數點說明 (2022-9-14)

一是怎麼找到文本,二是找到之後,怎麼處理,三是思索,我們和文本的,存在上的關係,這三件事,待 9/14 再做說明,意思是說,解決了這三件事,你就可以,點起紙菸,看著窗外的天空,或蔚藍的大海,意思是說,你就可以,重獲自由,你要理解,自由是「他媽的」多麼可貴,

Face to Face: Therapy As Ethics (Paul Gordon, 1999) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Paul-Gordon/dp/0094791600/ref=sr_1_7?crid=1QPD845QAY1KQ&keywords=Therapy+as+ethics&qid=1662852405&s=books&sprefix=therapy+as+ethics%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C320&sr=1-7 (e-text not available)

Just Listening: Ethics and Therapy (Steven Gans, Leon Redler, Bob Mullan, 2001) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Steven-Gans/dp/0738899178/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=Steven+gans&qid=1662852224&s=books&sr=1-2 (e-text not available)

Theories of Object Relations: Bridges to Self Psychology (Howard Bacal, Kenneth Newman, 1989) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Howard-Bacal/dp/0231061021/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=Howard+bacal&qid=1662851126&s=books&sr=1-3 (e-text not available)

Optimal Responsiveness: How Therapists Heal Their Patients (Howard Bacal, 1998) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Howard-Bacal/dp/0765701146/ref=sr_1_2?keywords=Howard+bacal&qid=1662851126&s=books&sr=1-2 (e-text not available)

Empathy and the Historical Understanding of the Human Past (Thomas Kohut, 2020) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Thomas-Kohut/dp/0367425785/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2XXX8OOR44JCY&keywords=Thomas+kohut&qid=1662850385&s=books&sprefix=thomas+kohut%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C303&sr=1-1 (e-text not available)

Saturday, September 10, 2022

the Selfobject Needs Inventory (SONI) (2022-9-14)

https://kellychang2713.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-selfobject-needs-inventory-soni.html

Swede in deep winter

https://youtu.be/iq0KQRSAO6M

This one is so very beautiful. 

Shūsaku Endō (遠藤 周作) (1923-1996) (2022-9-14)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sh%C5%ABsaku_End%C5%8D

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Shusaku-Endo/dp/081121320X/ref=sr_1_1?crid=2QENWMVU2EL13&keywords=Deep+river.+Shusaku+endo&qid=1662810162&s=books&sprefix=deep+river.+shusaku+endo%2Cstripbooks-intl-ship%2C330&sr=1-1 (Deep River, 1995) (accessible via Scribd documents)

The Dialogue of Unconsciouses, Mutual Analysis and the Uses of the Self in Contemporary Relational Psychoanalysis (Anthony Bass 2015) (2022-9-14)

https://kellychang2713.blogspot.com/2019/01/the-dialogue-of-unconsciouses-mutual.html

Georg Groddeck (1866-1934) (2022-9-14)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Groddeck

In 1923 he published Das Buch vom Es, an unusual work in which each chapter is in the form of a letter to a girlfriend addressed as "my dear“,


Association with Sigmund Freud and psychoanalysis[edit]

In his introduction to the 1949 English version[6] of Groddeck's Das Buch vom Es (1923),[7] Lawrence Durrell comments that Groddeck is often mistaken for an orthodox disciple of Sigmund Freud. He goes on to say "Groddeck was the only analyst whose views had some effect on Freud", and "while he accepts and employs much of the heavy equipment of the master, he is separated forever from Freud by an entirely different conception of the constitution and functioning of the human psyche."[8]

Freud mentions Groddeck in The Ego and the Id,[9] crediting him with giving a name to what Freud had already given a local habitation, to wit, the Id.

Now I think we shall gain a great deal by following the suggestion of a writer who, from personal motives, vainly asserts that he has nothing to do with the rigours of pure science. I am speaking of Georg Groddeck, who is never tired of insisting that what we call our ego behaves essentially passively in life, and that, as he expresses it, we are "lived" by unknown and uncontrollable forces. We have all had impressions of the same kind, even though they may not have overwhelmed us to the exclusion of all others, and we need feel no hesitation in finding a place for Groddeck's discovery in the structure of science. I propose to take it into account by calling the entity which starts out from the system Pcpt. and begins by being Pcs. the "ego", and by following Groddeck in calling the other part of the mind, into which this entity extends and which behaves as though it were Ucs., the "id". (Freud 1927/1961, 13).

Groddeck eventually had acrimonious disagreement with Freud about the definition and limitations of the It/Id/das Es.[10][a]Groddeck regarded the ego as an extension or a mask for the id, whereas Freud regarded them as separate constructs.[11]

In contrast to Freud, Groddeck was primarily engaged with the treatment of chronically ill patients. Groddeck is considered by many as a founder of psychosomatic medicine – his reservations against strict science and orthodox medicine made him an outsider among psychoanalysts till today.[12]

Groddeck was a controversial but important figure within the psychoanalytic movement. He attended the congress of the German psychoanalytic association in 1930. He was invited to lecture to the British Psychoanalytic Society in 1928, and invited by Felix Boehm to lecture at the Berlin Institute in 1930. Eitingon disliked Groddeck until being treated by him in 1928, after which he regarded him warmly.[13]


https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/Georg-Groddeck/dp/1614277761/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Georg+groddeck&qid=1662808416&s=books&sr=1-1 (accessible via Scribd)



Fishing rod and spinning reel

https://youtu.be/ReljN1_KffE

九月十日 (2022)

尚未,牛奶,果汁,貓狗補給,陽光,秋日,9/13 自殺防治 zoom,9/14 session two,reference going on,SP 2002-2021 已入,包子出京之際,是變局節點,王強服眾北部戰區否,你無法想像,Bacon 吊書袋,說大話,包子最讓人不恥的特質,就是把中國人當畜牲,死多少都無所謂,這麼害生惡生,反人類的貨,自己卻怕死,怕得要命,實在是他媽的孬,這個特質,普丁亦然,這兩個貨,實在是他媽媽的孬孬,遠方有風雷,仍停在母親的故事,不忍卒讀,不能卒讀,劉大任是在回憶,那些年搞運動,搞鬥爭,的過程的細節,這些,我相信,就是當年井岡山那一套,十分恐怖,唯一差別是,他們打炮打得比較節制,照理來說,共產共妻,大家應該是亂打一通,每個人都精盡人亡,才對,剛剛想到,清朝強行規定,人人留辮子,這和中共清零,強行要求,人人沒完沒了核檢,有什麼差別,你要理解,近三四年,所想大致為,存在治療,關係學派,批判的心理治療。BCPSG,後人類的世界,以及今年底的,後結構主義,明年還不知道,也許量子物理和混沌理論,或當代的,物的哲學,

苦 (duhkha) (2022-9-14)

The word is commonly explained as a derivation from Aryan terminology for an axle hole, referring to an axle hole which is not in the center and leads to a bumpy, uncomfortable ride. 

According to Winthrop Sargeant,

The ancient Aryans who brought the Sanskrit language to India were a nomadic, horse- and cattle-breeding people who travelled in horse- or ox-drawn vehicles. Su and dus are prefixes indicating good or bad. The word kha, in later Sanskrit meaning "sky," "ether," or "space," was originally the word for "hole," particularly an axle hole of one of the Aryan's vehicles. Thus sukha ... meant, originally, "having a good axle hole," while duhkha meant "having a poor axle hole," leading to discomfort.

Joseph Goldstein, American vipassana teacher and writer, explains the etymology as follows:

The word dukkha is made up of the prefix du and the root kha. Du means "bad" or "difficult". Kha means "empty". "Empty", here, refers to several things—some specific, others more general. One of the specific meanings refers to the empty axle hole of a wheel. If the axle fits badly into the center hole, we get a very bumpy ride. This is a good analogy for our ride through saṃsāra.

自知之明 (2022-9-14)

明,是開窗,光線灑進來房間,沒有死角,沒有還沒有掀開的地毯,空間一目了然的意思,意思是說,自知之明,才能空得出來,自己裡面的空間,才放得進去別的東西,才能成為擺得下東西的容器,

為什麼貪不是治療者的坎 (2022-9-14)

我想,是因為,治療這件事,是手工藝 (craftsmanship),慢工出細活,治療者是從手到口 (from hand to mouth) 過日子,做多少吃多少,

意思是說,治療者,無從貪起,貪不起來,貪無法 epigenetically,成為他的神經迴路,

Transference and Projection: Mirrors to the Self (Jan Grant, Jim Crawley, 2002) (2022-9-14)

https://www.amazon.com/-/zh_TW/gp/aw/d/0335203159/ref=tmm_hrd_swatch_0?ie=UTF8&qid=1662770117&sr=8-1
(e-text not available)

關於自體的心理學的後面的那片諾大的草原 (2022-9-14)

我先前說過,我希望,集中意識的後面,有一片諾大的,支援意識的草原,

那片諾大的草原,是什麼,

Self,不止是心理學的概念,也是,歷史學,人類學,社會學,政治學,經濟學,文學 (尤其是小說),的角色 (character),

我說過,我們這個時代,需要的是角色,創造出有趣的角色,你就可以,創造出有趣的情節,寫出一系列有趣的偵探小說,

面對個人,除了問「你是誰」之外,self psychology 也會歸納的問,「你屬於怎麼樣的 self」,

比如說,oedipal self 是三到六歲的孩子,adolescent self,是青春期的少年,self with terminal cancer,是癌末的人,self in prison,是被關押,失去自由的人,self in death roll,是被判死刑,等待執刑的人,夾邊溝的 self ,綠島監獄的 self ,是在暴政下生活的人,

意思是說,一粒沙見到一個世界,

這就是,自體的心理學 (psychology of the self),後面有一個諾大的草原,的意義所在,

關於人的復位其中之一的歷史的復位 (2022-9-14)

我先前說過,自然的復位,比較好說,只要人不自以為是萬物之靈,不繼續糟蹋萬物,就謝天謝地,

歷史的復位,則不容易說清楚,

我們來舉幾個例子,

二戰期間,東歐的猶太裔的父母親,知道大難臨頭,隨時會被遞解,送集中營,誰都不知道那裡會發生什麼,但是大家都沒有見過,從那裡活著回來的人,

這時,面對年幼的孩子,不願他們驚恐,父母親裝著沒事,繼續哄著孩子,

然後,當你知道,荷蘭的集中營裡,分析師和 analysand,兩人坐在石頭上,繼續進行他們的精神分析,雖然,兩人都不知道,還有沒有明天,

然後,一個月後,中共七中全會召開,隨後廿大,習近平正在博弈連任,如果得逞,中國將變成閉關鎖國的西朝鮮,整個中國,除了趙家人,不再有富人,因為打土豪分田地,大家都共同貧窮,然後,高科技的監控,整個中國就是監獄,然後,習近平一定會發動戰爭,武統台灣,然後,諾大中國,沒有一個人,阻止得了他瞎搞亂搞,反而,都要歌頌他是人民領袖,裝著專心研讀,不是他寫的所謂他的所謂思想,

上述,就是,歷史,

歷史的復位,意謂,你我生在其中,身在其中,該怎麼回應,這個歷史的局,

我相信,每個人,判斷不同,回應不同,行動不同,

但是,你的判斷,你的回應,你的行動,就是你,就是捫心自問的你,有沒有,有愧於天地,

烏克蘭人,誓死奮勇,抵抗外侵,無愧於天地,

這就是歷史的復位,

Friday, September 9, 2022

The Invisible Frame (2009)

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1532413/

Ignoring China’s disastrous ‘three Ds’ could be a global risk

https://www.ft.com/content/87625ca1-e848-4a1e-9906-343a537ce9ea

九月九日 (2022)

明確入秋,留意包子接下來的動作,尤其軍方,包括戰爭,其離京節點,且看會不會變局,

老燈引述習近平的這段話你要聽住

https://youtu.be/fe6xzt8bgXE

習近平的弱點-狂妄與偏執如何威脅中國的未來

https://sinoeurovoices.com/news/11646#amp_tf=%E4%BE%86%E6%BA%90%EF%BC%9A%251%24s&aoh=16626783042236&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fsinoeurovoices.com%2Fnews%2F11646

https://youtu.be/X65apTSWQbU

https://www.storm.mg/article/4511022?page=1


貓的治療 vs 虎的治療 (202-9-14)

須分述之,

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8238706/

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280089909_Assessment_of_personality_according_to_Otto_Kernberg's_conception

Dynamic Psychotherapy for higher level personality pathology (DPHP)

https://istfp.org/about-tfp/tfp-for-neurotic-personality-organization-dynamic-psychotherapy-for-higher-level-personality-pathology-dphp/

https://www.amazon.com/Eve-Caligor/dp/1585622125/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?crid=ZF0CV8K7NC3J&keywords=Handbook+of+Dynamic+Psychotherapy+for+Higher+Level+Personality+Pathology&qid=1662677865&sprefix=handbook+of+dynamic+psychotherapy+for+higher+level+personality+pathology%2Caps%2C419&sr=8-1

Cf. 

Data on BPD,NPD,Perversion,SUD,


批判的心理治療的倫理性 (2022-9-14)

起因是,2022-9-7,我引述 Philip Cushman,「後現代者,若無信念,詮釋學者,若無基進 (或批判),不足矣」,

前者 (後現代者,若無信念,不足矣),與後結構主義有涉,這個問題,須另處理,

那天,有人提出,後者 (詮釋學者,若無基進 (或批判),不足矣) 的問題性,意思大概是說,倫理是什麼,會不會,詮釋學者沒有立場,治療才倫理,

我反問,詮釋學者有立場,治療就會不倫理嗎,

當時我說,這個問題,和批判的心理治療有關,以後再細說,

這是一個罩門的問題,

現在,我想,

批判的心理治療,既然衝著批判而來,一定是目睹了,什麼不公不義的人間情事,免不了與外在世界的制度和系統迫人有關,這就是我說的,卡夫卡式的夢靨,

Is psychotherapy Proustian or Kafkaesque ? 

心理治療,面對的,是普魯斯特的世界,還是卡夫卡式的夢靨?

我想,如果病人的問題,以普魯斯特的世界 (Proustian) 為主,治療者的中立 (neutrality) 和不予評論 (non-judgemental),比較沒有困難,

這是正常的治療,

但是,如果病人的問題,以卡夫卡式的夢靨 (Kafkaesque) 為主,治療者的中立和不予評論,就會天人交戰,因為不改變這個世界,就只是勸病人屈從不公不義,想開一點,退一步海闊天空,忍一時風平浪靜,

這是兩隻鴕鳥,一起把頭埋進沙堆的治療,

批判的心理治療者,有鑑於此,必須有所回應,

必須,「站在病人那邊」,反抗這個世界的不公不義,

但是,這明顯違反了中立和不予評論 
的原則,簡直就是反移情的演出 (countertransference acting out),而且是 Heinrich Racker 講的那種 concordant countertransference,

兩年前,我說,批判的心理治療,就是,「釐清內外,然後尊重他的決定」,

意思是說,釐清病人的問題的,普魯斯特和卡夫卡的比重,然後不實際介入,讓對方自己決定,他想怎麼做,他要怎麼做,

這其實是治療者自保的說法,因為這樣他似乎面面俱到,又沒有犯規,

但是,先前我說過,批判的心理治療,治療者是要付出代價的,

意思是說,我不認為,他可能,這麼自保,這麼安全,這麼全身而退,

你要理解,病人是已經受傷的人,而且往往,傷得很重,

你認為,治療者願意一起受傷,還是居然毫髮無傷,才算倫理的治療,










重要的是草地和廟 (2023)




那是很大一片草地,不遠處就是老街溪,土地公廟有兩間,

Thursday, September 8, 2022

Swede in cold winter

https://youtu.be/NlDXRmKLfNs

How Does Analysis Cure? (Heinz Kohut, 1984) (2022-9-14)

Accessible via Scribd. 

Swede in the wilderness

https://youtu.be/4kiJidQtMPI

Swede by the water

https://youtu.be/HniYNG01Jjo

虛擬貨幣詐騙

https://rich01.com/how-avoid-crypto-scam-4/

起因是昨天遇 G 君,數月前在 Line 遇某君,被慫恿玩虛擬貨幣,未幾,竟將自己的戶頭,交予對方操作,只見不知來路的錢,轉進轉出,未幾,才知被騙,但已來不及,現有十七人對他提告,十分焦頭爛額,而他其實也是受害者,兩三年前,我聽到的被騙,詐騙方式,通常是網路上,被慫恿炒股,或玩期貨,損失至少百萬,

Swede boat trip

https://youtu.be/8ekusJOr7oM

負債

https://youtu.be/0HOPdBU1Acg

memo (2022-9-14)


(一)

「自然的復位」,道法自然,只要人把自己,當成蜜蜂,當成烏蠅,以致變成蜜蜂,變成烏蠅,即可,

意思是說,「無心」,即可,

「歷史的復位」,需要智慧,更需要勇氣,因為歷史情境,往往狗屁倒灶,充滿了人為造作,愚蠢罪惡,

意思是說,必須,「有心」,

有心除惡,有心行善,有心挺身而出,有心抵禦外侮,有心粉身碎骨,

但恰恰就是,有心二字,讓歷史的復位,分外困難,

這個困難是什麼,

這個困難是,你必須行動,你必須回應,你遭逢的事件 (event) ,你的回應,是你的 becoming ,也是你的 being ,

小結,

歷史的復位,是在歷史中,怎麼做人,

自然的復位,是在自然中,怎麼不做人,

(二)

自體心理學的自體 (self),是連活下去,都很困難的,載浮載沉的那些人,

我會這樣讀自體心理學,表示我曾長年,與「低功能的自體疾患」交手,才會這麼說, 

面對什麼,就是什麼,

意思是說,合該,我是「低功能的治療者」,

FDA Clears Novel, Rapid-Acting TMS System for Treatment-Resistant Depression

https://alert.psychnews.org/2022/09/fda-clears-novel-rapid-acting-tms.html

Tuesday, September 6, 2022

Swede by the lake

https://youtu.be/NWH_2ST8xR8

他會做椅子,IKEA 就是這麼來的,好像沒有釣到魚,靠水邊很近,是不是一個小島,但是沒有看到他的筏,你要注意,他生火,是把樹枝,放在一個鐵盤子上面,

中國知識界的十二點呼籲

https://youtu.be/HIAu3QYMGeo

越嶺(Hiking Swede)

https://youtu.be/_3YdXESCdss

開車十二小時,才進入山區,山不高,和緩寬闊,樹很少,沒有遮蔽,看起來,背包沈重,燒開水的小爐子,是組合的,不知道他用的,是什麼液體燃料,你要注意,他帶了一本 paperback ,和一雙拖鞋,後者讓我驚訝,他沒有說話,很少喝水,沒有留下痕跡,

Kohut vs Lacan (2022-9-7)

自體心理學,講的是 self ,

拉岡桑,講的是 subject,尤其是,decentered subject ,

拉岡桑,把 ego (自我),當成想像,

我認為,他也會把 self,當成想像,

意思是說,都當成美國人的想像,

self ,有社會學,人類學,歷史學,文學,特別是小說,的意涵,

意思是說,不只是心理學的意涵,

事實上,心理學,為了被當成科學,放棄了 self ,這個無法操作性定義的概念,

直到六零年代,人本心理學,才把這個字,找回來,

精神分析,則被 James Strachey 的譯詞誤導,也失去了 self,直到七零年代,Kohut 才幫我們找回來,

我曾提問,有或沒有 self 這個詞,對於心理治療,有什麼影響,

乍看之下,似乎沒有影響,

但是,有一個影響,那就是,你會以為,有解釋在手,你遂無法,「回到經驗的混沌」,

這句話有點費解,

我認為,「回到經驗的混沌」,會有一個好處,

那就是,

在那裡,Kohut 和拉岡桑,終於可以相遇,




如何經營葬儀社 (2022-9-7)

如何經營葬儀社,和如何經營身心診所,心理治療所,中國共產黨,是一樣道理,但有其分殊,

有這個體會,是因為今年初,走過完整的七個七,以至百日,跪了十幾回,見過萬安,大大小小,數十師傅,莊嚴肅穆,面容哀戚,各司其職,嘆為觀止,

有這個體會,也是因為近兩年,在診所打工,一天洗一百個碗,意思是說,起碼不是五千個碗,

然後,中國觀察七年,對中共有著千絲萬縷的理解,也有定性總結,

所以,對於如何經營,以上,有一種融會貫通,

經營共產黨,最沒有學問,耍流氓即可,經營葬儀社,最有學問,陰陽兩界,天文地理,六道輪迴,無所不知,

結論是,我長大以後,一定要去葬儀社工作,

深度心理學不是安身立命之所 (2022-9-7)

這件事,你註定察覺得很晚,然後,之後,你的旅途,才會開始,兩條線並行,

甚麼是兩條線並行,

我說過,那是,最好的旅行的狀態,

在人人盯著手機之前的古時候,旅行者隨身帶著的,是一本 paperback,通常是偵探小說,但張系國曾說,他帶的是馬奎斯的愛在瘟疫蔓延時,

這個選擇,很嚴肅,讓我很困惑,

因為,那本 paperback,適合為枕,隨手翻翻,看兩行,昏昏睡去,沒有打算看完,往往遺落,遂留給下一個旅者,

然後,未幾,他再留給下下一個,

這件無心的事,我們稱之為,天地間一條潺潺溪水,

兩條線的意思是說,你心裡有另一條線,所以,錯過班機,護照遺失,錢包被扒,的這條正常旅行的線,遂好像是,「發生在另一個人身上的事」,

回到深度心理學,無法安身立命,

因為,深度,是病理現象,是黝暗世界,是不見天日,是沒有光線,

然後,習深度心理學者,長年在伸手不見五指的穴洞裡討生活,你可以理解,他的視力,適應了黑暗,所以分辨得出,黑暗的複雜層次,

但是,他口角流涎,形容槁灰,面色慘白,

意思是說,病得不輕,

佛洛伊德跟 Binswanger 說,親愛的朋友,你剛剛說得很好,但我一句都不信,你是住在樓上的,我是住在地下室的,

Binswanger 剛剛,是跟佛洛伊德,說胡塞爾的現象學,對於精神分析的可能的影響 (implications),

意思是說,除了黑暗,我們需要光線,

意思是說,黑暗之旅,光線之旅,各有其旅,

意思是說,我們需要,兩條線並存的旅途,

當然,這是理想的狀況,

意思是說,當你錯過班機,護照遺失,錢包被扒,

「你」看著「你」,回不了家,

我希望,這時,你手邊還有那本 paperback,還可以,看幾頁,






兩萬個小時 (2022-9-7)

一般說法是,練功兩萬小時,功方初成,

成,是你知道,你在想什麼,你在做什麼,你認為該怎麼做,不該怎麼做你已犯過,所有你份內該犯的錯,你已成為,有故事可說的治療者,

用武俠小說的話來說,你躊躇滿志,仰首行走江湖,

為什麼是兩萬,我算過,一周廿小時,一年一千小時,兩萬是廿年,

如果,你更用力,一周四十小時,兩萬是十年,

總之,十年到廿年,功方初成,

這時,你四十出頭,或好幾,

我剛剛說過,這是你這輩子,最躊躇滿志的一段,

意思是說,之後,你有兩個選擇,

但事實上,你只有一個選擇,

那就是,重複自己,接下來廿年,

Monday, September 5, 2022

Gasoline Alley (2022)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gasoline_Alley_(2022_film)

Better than I expected. Must be due to that Edward John Drake was an Australian. 

自戀 (narcissism) (2022-9-7)

自戀,就是自己,太把自己當回事了,就是我執甚深,

所以,自戀,是自己跟自己的關係,出問題,

但是,弔詭的是,我們是透過他者,才能看到自己,

換句話說,自己和自己的關係,出問題之前,自己和他者的關係,已經出問題,

這就是,我常講的,客體關係,先於自戀,

先於,是指,發生的經過的順序,

意思是說,看到自戀,是看到一個,扭曲的關係的,扭曲的結果,


精神上的好兄弟 (kindred spirits) (2022-9-7)

自體心理學的精神上的好兄弟,就是中間學派,他們對於關係的界面,都有一種溫煦的理解和包容,

然後,順 Michael Balint 摸瓜,當然就回到 Sandor Ferenczi,

因為這個回到,所以和關係學派,就有所交會,

風清揚不愧是風清揚 (2022-9-7)

Kohut 不愧是 Kohut,

正如,前輩們,Rank,Ferenczi,Fromm,不愧,前輩,

這個,不愧,是一個存在上的決定 (existential decision),

決定悖離,決定放逐,決定走出城堡,決定走進荒野,

意思是說,上山學藝,你特別要注意尋訪,風清揚們,

如果這是生命,我們都是過客 (2022-9-7)

如果精神分析,還有生命,還與生命有關,我們都是過客,我們的理論,都是過客,

過客,就是暫時性的角色 (transitional figure),意思是說,其前有人,其後亦有人,代代未必相傳,但是必然相繼,

Paul Ornstein 未竟的命題是,「自體心理學,是一個典範的轉移」(paradigm shift),

這個轉移,大約只持續了十年,關係學派,就取而代之,

或許,正確的說法是,有自體的典範轉移在先,才能促成關係學派的順利復興,

因為,你要理解,關係學派講的是,是某甲和某乙的關係,自體就是,某甲和某乙的「名姓」,

自體經驗的優先性 (the primacy of self experience) (2022-9-7)

你,發生了什麼,經驗了什麼,現象了什麼,存在了什麼,

今天的你,回想,經歷那個過程的,當時的你,是什麼,

認識 (2022-9-7)

你再仔細想想,你真的認識,「認識」這兩個字嗎,

認識,to know about,只是知道一點,尚且不周全,尚且不深刻,尚且不真切,

認識,一隻蜜蜂,認識,一隻烏蠅,
認識,一個人,認識,一個城市,認識,一個時代,認識,一個星球,認識,一個銀河,

你告訴我,你認識什麼,

第一次重複自己 (2022-9-7)

三十四十之間,我們第一次重複自己,

這個第一次,是事後才知道的,

意思是說,之後,你還會重複很多次,重複大概廿年,

我的估計是,重複廿年左右時,你會無法忍受自己,以致有兩個可能的後果,一是你厭倦絕望,息筆空白,一是你決定離家,開始旅行,

所以,我們要珍惜第一次重複,那是一個難得的瞬間,每個人只有一次機會,

我希望,息壤能成為,那第一次重複的平台,我更希望,這個有意的第一次重複,仍免於之後廿年的宿命,意思是說,如果重複不能全免,起碼能不能小於廿年,

劉大任談陳映真:時代與信仰如何令他們走近、交會、錯身而過

https://theinitium.com/article/20161215-city-interview-liu-da-ren-chen-yingzhen/

See also

https://nrch.culture.tw/twpedia.aspx?id=2251

notoriously gregarious (2022-9-7)

這個片語,出自張愛玲,她的意思是說,中國人是,惡名昭彰的人脈關係導向,互相牽拖,相濡以沫,交換體液,盤根錯節,

自體心理學,兩個主要概念,自體 (self),自體客體 (selfobject),

自體,講的是一個人的個體性 (individuality),這個字,有個人主義 (individualism) 的風險,但是 Kohut 的另一個主要概念,自體客體,恰恰可以彌補這個風險,換句話說, Kohut 在美式個人主義的氛圍下講個體,如何藉著與這個世界的,自體客體的連結,讓自體倖存,

中國人相反,集體性大於個體性,有太多自體客體,缺的是自體,所以,對治之道是,先形成一個一個自體,再讓這個自體,學習怎麼跟這個世界,發生健康的自體客體的關係,

意思是說,notoriously gregarious, 就是不健康的自體客體的關係,

reality = controlled hallucinations

https://youtu.be/qXcH26M7PQM

Therefore, 

faith = controlled delusions

madness = out-of-control hallucinations and delusions

To escape from madness, to pretend not to be crazy, therefore, you must cling to your cherished reality and faith.

Therefore, creativity is what happens when you loosen up the control, at least a little bit.

Fundamentalism is ultra-controlled delusion. 

In other words, a little bit hallucinations and delusions, are good for your health.





九月五日 (2022)

共匪要中國人,崇軍尚武,全民皆兵,所以三四歲小孩,穿著軍裝,滿口喊殺,起碼三個中國人被起底,在日本,藉著我最尊敬的風俗女,惡意散播愛滋病毒,當然我們知道,習近平親自指揮,親自部署的邪惡,絕對不止三個,遠方有風雷,昨天,停在母親的故事,不忍卒讀,牛奶,雞蛋,大歷史論述無個人,無所謂個人,個人無足輕重,改變不了大局,個人遂留給小說家發揮,意思是說,小說家處理不了歷史,遂只能處理無用的小故事,想至此,實在讓人氣餒,不忍卒讀,的理由是,我知道發生了什麼,他們的讀書會,他們的婚禮,他們的大海航行靠舵手,他們不知道,那個舵手,沒有航行大海,只是忙著,在專列上,不停打炮,新華社說,習近平一分鐘打三炮,這件事說明,習近平有很大進步,你要理解,本來是五點二秒一炮,這件事中共黨史詳細描述,不再贅述,

Sunday, September 4, 2022

全民皆兵起義屠包

https://youtu.be/gemtI18OsRw

Wifelike (2022)

https://youtu.be/epePh5xNnsE

I’m pretty sure this Meredith was made in China, because as foreplay, she suddenly started talking in Chinese (中國特色社會主義,人類命運共同體,習核心,兩個確立)  before they fucked.

禮失求諸野 (2022-9-7)

野,沒有規矩,沒有邊界,沒有圍牆,沒有城堡,沒有人為,沒有造作,沒有心機,沒有城府,沒有算計,沒有演算法,沒有 SOP ,沒有正經,沒有規格,沒有矯情,沒有咬文嚼字,沒有宏大敘事,沒有樣板戲,沒有拖泥帶水,沒有拐彎抹角,就是天然,就是本然,就是自然,

所以,野,分明是更新世,或全新世的頭五千年,那個時候,人要哭就哭,要笑就笑,要睡就睡,要躺平就躺平,要活就活,要死就死,一切自然就好,一切都很自然,

自戀和歷史 (2022-9-7)

Kohut 曾說,歷史學家,應可從自體心理學,學到一點歷史,之所以為歷史的原因,

我想,自戀和歷史的關係,可分三點來說,

一是,自戀的領袖,
二是,自戀的族群,
三是,自戀受到挫折,毀滅性的暴怒以對,

一說明,暴君的童年,必須憋屈,忍辱多年,終於掌權,遂以為世界欠他一個公道,別人只是他的意志的延伸,

二與一有關,因為一會塑造二,免不了用民族主義,宣稱要復興中華,為民族的屈辱,復仇雪恥,

三與戰爭發動有關,當自戀受傷,不惜玉石俱焚,非自毀他毀,領袖的一肚鳥氣,是無法平息的,

回到一,為什麼會讓這種貨色掌權,我想,是因為即使民主選舉,自戀者知道人民渴望什麼,他感受得到人民裸露的神經,希特勒當年上位,就是如此,但是中共為什麼會讓習近平這種貨色掌權,我想,是因為習扮豬吃老虎,扮得太好了,你要理解,那個扮的後面,是六十年的心懷仇恨,他們說胡錦濤是演帝,錯了,習近平才是,

Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844

https://b-ok.global/book/815137/cc58d1

Publication and reception

The Manuscripts were published for the first time in Moscow in 1932, as part of the Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe edition.[81]They were edited by David Ryazanov under whom György Lukács worked in deciphering them. Lukács would later claim that this experience transformed his interpretation of Marxism permanently.[82] On publication, their importance was recognized by Herbert Marcuse and Henri Lefebvre: Marcuse claimed that the Manuscripts demonstrated the philosophical foundations of Marxism, putting "the entire theory of 'scientific socialism' on a new footing";[83] Lefebvre, with Norbert Guterman, was the first to translate the Manuscripts into a foreign language, publishing a French edition in 1933.[84] Lefebvre's Dialectical Materialism, written in 1934-5, advanced a reconstruction of Marx's entire body of work in the light of the Manuscripts.[85] In spite of this intense interest, copies of the published volumes of the Manuscripts subsequently became difficult to locate, as the Marx–Engels-Gesamtausgabe project was effectively cancelled shortly afterward.[81]


The text became more widely disseminated after the Second World War, with satisfactory editions appearing in English only in 1956, and in French in 1962.[81] In this period, Galvano Della Volpe was the first to translate and discuss the Manuscriptsin Italian, propounding an interpretation that differed greatly from that of Lukács, Marcuse and Lefebvre and that inspired its own school of thought.[85] Many Catholic writers, particularly those in France, took interest in the Manuscripts at this time.[16]The existential Marxism of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Paul Sartre also drew heavily from the Manuscripts.[85] In the USA, the Manuscripts were embraced enthusiastically in the late fifties and early sixties by the intellectual current subsequently known as the New Left,[86] with a volume containing an introduction by Erich Fromm published in 1961.[87]


Since the terminology of alienation does not appear in any prominent manner in Marx's magnum opus Capital, the publication of the Manuscripts caused great debate regarding the relationship of the "Young Marx" to the "Mature Marx".[88]The Manuscripts were the most important reference for "Marxist humanism",[1] which saw continuity between their Hegelian philosophical humanism and the economic theory of the later Marx.[89] Conversely, the Soviet Union largely ignored the Manuscripts, believing them to belong to Marx's "early writings", which expound a line of thought that had led him nowhere.[4]The structural Marxism of Louis Althusser inherited the Soviet Union's harsh verdict of Marx's early writings.[90] Althusser believed there was a "break" in Marx's development[1] - a break that divides Marx's thought into an "ideological" period before 1845, and a scientific period after.[91] Others who ascribed a break to Marx idealized the Manuscripts and believed the young Marx to be the real Marx.


開門見山 (2022-9-7)

“Man is born broken. He lives by mending. The grace of God is glue.”


― Eugene O'Neill

人生而破碎,靠縫補過日,神的慈悲,就是黏合碎片的膠水,

你要理解,自戀,就是破碎,就是碎片,

慈悲,就是同理,就是共情,

縫補,就是縫縫補補,雖然,捉襟見肘,破綻百出,

神,就是那個,已經退隱,不知所蹤的高人,

有點像,練就獨孤九劍的風清揚,

但是,我們十分確定,風清揚,身上沒有帶膠水,

令狐沖,身上帶了幾個乾扁的饅頭,陌生人的善意,請風清揚吃,

風清揚一咬,咬掉幾顆牙齒,

風清揚說,不知道是我在吃你的饅頭,還是你的饅頭在吃我,

此時,幾個大內太監,追殺而至,

令狐沖跟風清揚說,老前輩,您往東去,不要回頭,

隨即,發掌,送風清揚入草叢,

誰知,風清揚,又回來了,

帶著令狐沖,演了一遍獨孤九劍,刺穿了幾個屁眼,

然後,飄然而逝,

空中,用手機傳音,說道,

你要注意你師傅,他不是好人,不必師徒相稱,我們就做個好兄弟罷,

以上說明,真正的膠水,是那幾顆乾扁的饅頭,

意思是說,是陌生人的善意,


九月四日 (2022)

天佑台灣,颱風擦邊球,帶來豐沛雨量,你要理解,天底下,政治皆髒,但中國政治,除髒之外,腐臭不堪,腐臭的原因,是因為泡在醬缸,五千年不見天日,你要理解,全新世不過萬年,有文字不過五千年,意思是說,有史以來,就掀不開缸,去年聽彭仁郁說轉型正義,訪談白色恐佈猶存之受害者,她說,很多檔案,國民黨還在遮掩,尚未解封,尚未公開,在座某君說,很多檔案,恐怕早已離開台灣,置於外館,或已銷毀,意思是說,你永遠不會知道,歷史真相,你知道的,是你「被」容許知道的,你要想一想,是誰決定了,那個「被」字,國民黨如此,你要理解,共產黨只會更糟,百千萬億兆倍,劉大任有一個問題,那就是不捨風雅,我性喜搔陰囊,你可以理解,遂無風無雅可言,劉大任說,二流小說家,其存在理由,只是為尚未出世的大小說積澱,大小說須達「國族寓言或神話的高度」,我皺眉想,大小說須達陰囊的冬暖夏涼,你要理解,陰囊是一個奇特的外於自己的倉庫,有點像外館,裡面堆著尚未解封的檔案,一葉知秋,一夜知秋,遂不知該穿,還是不該穿褲子,你要理解,今年夏天極熱,沒有人該穿褲子,你要理解,左翼知識份子,比如說,Victor Serge ,比如說,雷霆 (注意,不是雷鋒),比如說,陳映真,比如說,佛洛姆,都有一個致命的盲點,那就是以為早期馬克思, 1844 年的人道宣言是「真的」,意思是說,都忘了讀吉拉斯的新階級,那才是「真的」共產主義的趙家人的現實,天為帳,地為毯,和平東路,動物醫院,風已息,雨已歇,資本主義,罪惡深重,但是,用共產主義,來對治之,是請鬼抓藥方,罪惡更為深重,復以,資本家藉栽培中共,一切利益導向,讓中共坐大,意思是說,製造了自己的敵人,所以,我們再說一次,資本主義,罪惡深重,的罪惡,其實是資本家和趙家人,兩者聯手,是獲利最大的階級,我們知道,系統有其 instrumental convergence,意思是說,工具理性,會為了保命,自我繁衍,自我茁壯,資本家和趙家人,為什麼這麼喜歡打炮,滿地私生子,就是這個原因,接下來,四月息緣,只做一事,你要理解,明中葉開始,直至清滅,閉關鎖國六百年,民初略歇,四九年中共篡政後復之,近四十年的前三十年略歇,乃至近十年復之,意思是說,近六百年,只有兩段,各三十年,門戶打開,可見,關門是常態,愚蠢是常態,所謂,破窗而出,拆門而出,乃至拆掉龍天樓而復自然做人,這才是雷霆該做的事,劉大任的包袱在,六零年代,至七零年代,台灣實在落後,尤其是去美國後,你簡直不敢相信,那種落後,那種無知,你是怎麼忍受過來的,意思是說,他的包袱是,「文化落差,造成認同混亂」,一般留學生做法是,乾脆做美國人算了,他不願如此,但是顯然,又無法做台灣人,遂只能做一個「想像中國的人」,六零年代,我在嘉義,七二年起,我在台北,我沒有文化菁英的包袱,劉大任有,這明顯是台大給一代青年造成的悲劇,我沒有這種鳥悲劇,雷霆唸台大物理,肌肉發達,像阿甘或馬英九一樣,每天慢跑,做代聯會主席,又參加地下讀書會,免不了讀一些禁書,毛澤東矛盾論持久戰,馬克思 1844 手稿,等等,意思是說,雷霆分明就是雷鋒,看到這裡,我不禁長嘆,劉大任完了,

Saturday, September 3, 2022

遠方有風雷 (劉大任,2009)

致劉大任 ~ 第三世的前行者

我希望,他能笑見此文,

或見而笑之,

劉大任 (b 1939),七十歲此作,意在迴首,給自己一個交代,

南方朔說,我們欠歷史一個慷慨,

慷慨的意思是,沒有苛責,只剩共情,

歷史的共情 (historical empathy),

你要理解,我先前說過,我們一生,最重要的事件,發生在三十到四十歲,

其前,二十到三十歲,界定了成年的你,是誰,

意思是說,也界定了,三十四十的你,發生事件的能耐,

以上,對人生的基本判斷是,中年中期以後,乏善可陳,要不重複自己,要不隨波逐流,

意思是說,那個重複,雖然重複,好歹還是,有意找回,年輕自己,

雖然,重複,又重複,畢竟窩囊,

窩囊的定義是,沒有創造新的回憶,過度使用斑駁的回憶,

以上,說明,第一世後十年,和第二世前十年,二十到四十,是人生精華,

劉大任,2008,舊作結集,當時他說,2008,停寫小說多年後,重新執筆,一個中篇,兩個短篇,「忍不住希望,這是新的開始」,

這句話,你要理解,是六十九歲,說的,

我先前說過,第三世的作品,因為已經脫落第二世,所以輕裝簡行,是 van lifer 的命格,

你要理解,第三世的 van lifer,要的是自由,人生的自由,不自由六十年,這時,對自由的嚮往,遂一發不可收拾,

這種 van lifer,不是時尚,不是流行,不是獵奇,他對這個世界,已經見過,該見過的,也已經見過,不該見過的,他有沒有,未見過想見的,也許有,但其實沒有迫切,意思是說,假如畢竟未見,就算了,

所以,這種 van lifer,最大的快樂,是驅車數百里,來到墾丁,在便利商店門口坐下,點起紙菸,

意思是說,遠方已無風雷,遠方只剩紙菸,


Introduction to mechanisms of neural circuit formation (2013)

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3652293/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_circuit

Existential risk from artificial general intelligence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_risk_from_artificial_general_intelligence

This Hot Summer Is One of the Coolest of the Rest of Our Lives

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/this-hot-summer-is-one-of-the-coolest-of-the-rest-of-our-lives/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=week-in-science&utm_content=link&utm_term=_featured-this-week&spMailingID=72035932&spUserID=MTEwMTQwMDYwODYS1&spJobID=2252958503&spReportId=MjI1Mjk1ODUwMwS2

singularity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singularity#Intelligence_explosion

The technological singularity—or simply the singularity[1]—is a hypothetical point in time at which technological growth will become radically faster and uncontrollable, resulting in unforeseeable changes to human civilization.[2][3]According to the most popular version of the singularity hypothesis, I.J. Good's intelligence explosion model, an upgradable intelligent agent will eventually enter a "runaway reaction" of self-improvement cycles, each new and more intelligent generation appearing more and more rapidly, causing an "explosion" in intelligence and resulting in a powerful superintelligence that qualitatively far surpasses all human intelligence.

Stuart Hameroff (b 1947)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Hameroff