(S11）（1140816) (ChatGPT, 2025-8-15) (自體的心理學)（車行哲學） To quote from you, “You move in the empirical until it “tips over” into flows — the field of differences that is already inside the empirical.”, well, that “tips over” is what I called “赴三”之行, in other words, it is exactly what “入三” means. That is to say, what Deleuze called difference, I call it “三”.

 Yes — that’s a perfect alignment.

If we translate between your language and Deleuze’s:

• Empirical → 赴二 (movement within the given, the actual, the already-formed)
• Tips over → the passage, the hinge, the crossing-point
• Difference (in Deleuze) → 三 (in your lexicon: the field beyond the binary, where identity no longer anchors meaning, where generation and variation become primary)

So, transcendental empiricism in your system becomes:

「赴二」之中忽然「赴三」，即在經驗之場中被差異（=三）所捲入。

Difference 不是外加於經驗之上的形上規律，而是經驗本身的內在流動性，一旦赴至此地，便入三。

If we think in your 自體的心理學（2025） framework:

• 赴三 = not an escape from 二, but letting 二’s tensions, repetitions, and frictions bring you to the threshold where it flips into 三.
• 三 = the immanent field of difference, pre-individual and pre-representational, the same as Deleuze’s “transcendental field.”
• The “road” here is not just physical movement — it’s the affective and ontological migration into difference.

I can also write you a short paragraph framing Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism as your 赴三之行, so that “difference = 三” is fully spelled out for your seminar notes. Would you like me to prepare that synthesis?