Monday, November 20, 2023

André Green (1927-2012) (negativity vs vitality)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Green_(psychoanalyst)

  • The Work of the Negative by Andre Green, Andrew Weller (Translator), Publisher: Free Association Books, 1999, ISBN 1-85343-470-1
  • On Private Madness, Publisher: International Universities Press, 1997, ISBN 0-8236-3853-7
  • The Chains of Eros, Publisher: Karnac Books, 2002, ISBN 1-85575-960-8
  • Psychoanalysis: A Paradigm For Clinical Thinking Publisher: Free Association Books, 2005, ISBN 1-85343-773-5
  • Life narcissism, death narcissism London: Free Association Books 2001, ISBN 1-85343-530-9
  • Key ideas for a contemporary psychoanalysis. Misrecognition and recognition of the unconscious. London: Routledge, 2005. ISBN 1-58391-838-8
  • ‘A Dual Conception of Narcissism: Positive and Negative Organizations', (2002). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 71:631-649
  • The Fabric of Affect in the Psychoanalytic Discourse, The New Library of Psychoanalysis, London and NY, 1999, ISBN 0-415-11525-6
  • Clinical and Observational Psychoanalytic Research: Roots of a Controversy - Andre Green & Daniel Stern (The Psychoanalytic Monograph Series), by Rosemary Davies  (Author), Anne-Marie Sandler  (Editor), Joseph Sandler  (Editor), Routledge, 2019

  • Illusions and Disillusions of Psychoanalytic Work (The International Psychoanalytical Association Psychoanalytic Ideas and Applications Series), by Andre Green, Routledge, 2019

  • On the Destruction and Death Drives, by  André Green  (Author), Howard B. Levine  (Editor), Phoenix Publishing House, 2022

About André Green:

  • The dead mother. The Work of André Green, ed. by Gregorio Kohon, London: Routledge 1999. (including an interview with A.G.)
  • The Greening of Psychoanalysis: Andre Green's New Paradigm in Contemporary Theory and Practice, by  Gregorio Kohon  (Editor), Rosine Jozef Perelberg  (Editor), Routledge, 2019


    The Freudian Matrix of ​André Green: Towards a Psychoanalysis for the Twenty-First Century (The International Psychoanalytical Association Psychoanalytic Ideas and Applications Series), by Howard B. Levine  (Editor), Routledge, 2023




The Art of Being Posthuman: Who Are We in the 21st Century? (Francesca Ferrando, 2024-2-20) (SP 2023) (自體的心理學)

https://www.amazon.com/Francesca-Ferrando/dp/1509548963/?_encoding=UTF8&pd_rd_w=D2qqv&content-id=amzn1.sym.ae1d87ab-6680-4296-ada1-5366169507b8&pf_rd_p=ae1d87ab-6680-4296-ada1-5366169507b8&pf_rd_r=143-1370885-0812855&pd_rd_wg=Ikxei&pd_rd_r=80282d4f-9af3-42ce-a47b-782ef2089d49&ref_=aufs_ap_sc_dsk

警惕军事上的“达克包子效应”

http://www.cnleaders.net/index/newsDetail/web/21-360.html

https://youtu.be/HKglBLyi1O8?si=r3iYg3enX1gtQYVi


John King Fairbank (1907-1991)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_King_Fairbank

Edgar Snow (1905-1972)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Snow

Works

The Cambridge History of China

https://www.cambridge.org/core/series/cambridge-history-of-china/A4D3D77A97EACA3F903136BBF64B9169

面子裡子

面子是嗔,裡子是貪,

文化心理學者,喜歡說,中國人 (中文為母語者) 好面子,

這是為什麼,中國人,須學外語,以便掙脫,中文語境,的原因,

面子,就是,他者眼中自己,

意思是說,除非照鏡,你見不到自己,

面子,明顯是,部落心態,宗族群居,相濡以沫所致,

意思是說,一小撮人,從生到死,攀比計較,總算操他媽的,揚眉吐氣,

這種氣,有點像屁,當然,是鳥氣,

你說,時至今日,都市高樓,已無他者,何來面子,

我點起紙菸,看著窗外,

我說,文化基因,恐怕未及滌清,江山易改,本性難移,死要面子的惡習,猖狂依舊,尤其那種,有頭有臉者,既要面子,又要裡子,

兩袖清風,的定義,就是無聲無息,無味無嗅,沒有面子,也沒有裡子,

意思是說,就是天地悠遊,無待知曉,野雀蜜蜂,烏蠅落葉,就是自在,就是自由,




Sunday, November 19, 2023

Gringo (2018)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gringo_(2018_film)

Nash Edgerton (b 1973)


Inducing narrative tension in the viewer through suspense, surprise, and curiosity

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X22000262

Abstract

Research into narrative tension is of interest in terms of the progress of knowledge of the processes and mechanisms by which stories are received and enjoyed. We have created four versions of an audiovisual story with three different structures of fiction (suspense, surprise, curiosity) and one of non-fiction. We have investigated the effects of the narrative tension of these stories with four groups of subjects (N=94). The results show that the organization of the stories, depending on their structures of suspense, surprise, or curiosity, induces narrative tension, while the non-fictional story, induces cognitive and affective effects of another kind. Narrative tension appears during narrative progression. It is manifested by cognitive-affective responses that include anticipations, diagnoses, retrospections, and emotions. In narrative tension, curiosity plays a triggering and organizing role in suspense and surprise. The emotions and cognitions that result from narrative tension during plot construction underpin the experience of enjoyment. The Multidimensional Narrative Tension Theory of Enjoyment that emerges from this research allows establishing connections between narrative theory concerned with narrative progression and plot, the psychology of interest, and the psychology of media enjoyment.



起因是這個片語,敘事的張力 (narrative tension) ,

The New York Times's Concepción de León had this to say about Paradise Highway: "Though it is refreshing to see members of law enforcement focused on recovering and supporting a victim rather than pursuing her abusers, it does not allow for much narrative tension".[19]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise_Highway


Fred Ward (1942-2022)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Ward

Florida Straits (1986), with Raul Julia (1940-1994). 用
唐吉訶德海葬,


Georg [György] Lukács (1885-1971)

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/lukacs/

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lukacs/index.htm

https://jacobin.com/2019/01/lukacs-hungary-marx-philosophy-consciousness

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gy%C3%B6rgy_Luk%C3%A1cs

The Berkeley Tanner Lectures

https://tannerlectures.berkeley.edu/

Bessel van der Kolk (b 1943) (negativity vs vitality)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_van_der_Kolk


THE HISTORY OF PSYCHOANALYSIS SERIES (Routledge, 37 books, 2023-11-19)

https://www.routledge.com/History-of-Psychoanalysis/book-series/KARNHIPSY

Pierre Janet (1859-1947) (negativity vs vitality)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Janet

Publications

In 1923, Janet wrote a definitive text on suggestion, La médecine psychologique, and in 1928-32 published several definitive papers on memory. His two-volume Obsessions et la psychastenie also proposed more than 60 different kinds of obsessions.[5]

While Janet did not publish much in English, the 15 lectures that he gave at Harvard Medical School between 15 October and the end of November 1906 were published in 1907 as The Major Symptoms of Hysteria. He received an honorary doctorate from Harvard University in 1936.

Of his great synthesis of human psychology, Henri Ellenberger wrote that "this requires about twenty books and several dozen of articles".[39]


Rediscovering Pierre Janet: Trauma, Dissociation, and a New Context for Psychoanalysis (The History of Psychoanalysis Series), by  Giuseppe Craparo  (Editor), Francesca Ortu  (Editor), Onno van der Hart  (Editor), Routledge, 2019


René Laforgue (1894-1962) (negativity vs vitality)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ren%C3%A9_Laforgue

Laforgue was born in Thann (then part of the German Empire) and died in Paris. He studied medicine in Berlin.

Nazi

His collaboration, like Georges Mauco, with the Nazis over the Aryanisation of the society in Paris during the Occupation in World War Two cast something of a shadow over his later career. He organized himself with the active Nazi Matthias Göring, cousin of Hermann Göring, who was the propagator of aryan psychotherapy and aryan psychoanalysis, Nazi-oriented.

He was convicted during a purge trial after the Second World War. René Laforgue went into exile in Morocco to be forgotten in Casablanca, where he expresses mysticism and racism.[1]

In the year of his death, 1962, he was removed from the roster of training analysts by the International Psychoanalytical Association.[2]

Psychoanalysis

In 1919 wrote a thesis on "The Affects in Schizophrenia Patients from a Psychoanalytical Point of View".[3] As his interest in psychoanalysis developed, he underwent a training analysis and began a correspondence with Sigmund Freud. In 1926, along with Marie Bonaparte and eight others, he founded the Paris Psychoanalytic Society.[4]

With his pupil G.Mauco, he meets Freud in Carlsbad, Czechoslovakia.[5] [6]

Laforgue is the author of several books on psychoanalysis, albeit more popularising than original;[7] as well as of a variety of articles on subjects ranging from the eroticization of fear in gambling,[8] through the development of the sense of reality, to such defense mechanisms as psychological repression and isolation.[9]

According to Roudinesco, intellectually however he remained as much indebted to the French tradition of Pierre Janet and Henri Claude as to Freud;[10] and the tensions implicit in his competing allegiances contributed to his debate with Freud over the French introduction of the term scotomization. Initially welcomed as a description of the blocking of unpleasant perceptions in hysteria by Freud, the latter swiftly turned against it, arguing that Laforgue himself maintained "that 'scotomization' is a term that arises from descriptions of dementia praecox, which does not arise from a carrying over of psychoanalytic concepts".[11]

Despite their theoretical disagreement, the two men remained on friendly terms, Laforgue visiting the Freuds on occasion in the 1920s: he would in the 1950s write a memoir of them, which offers a rare glimpse of Martha Freud as "a practical woman, marvellously skillful in creating an atmosphere of peace and joie de vivre".[12]


Scotomization (negativity vs vitality)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scotomization

Scotomization is a psychological term for the mental blocking of unwanted perceptions, analogous to the visual blindness of an actual scotoma.

Controversies

This term initially has used by Charcot in connection with hysteria.[1]

Psychoanalysis

Reviving in the 1920s this term, Rene Laforgue and Edouard Pinchon introduced the idea of scotomization into psychoanalysis – a move initially welcomed by Freud in 1926 as a useful description of the hysterical avoidance of distressing perceptions.[2] The following year, however, he attacked the term for suggesting that the perception was wholly blotted out (as with a retina's blind spot), whereas his clinical experience showed that on the contrary intense psychic measures had to be taken to keep the unwanted perception out of consciousness.[3] A debate followed between Freud and Laforgue, further illuminated by Pinchon's 1928 article on 'The Psychological Significance of Negation in French', where he argued that "The French language expresses the desire for scotomisation through the forclusif."[4]

Lacan

Decades later in the 1950s, the question of scotomization re-emerged in a phenomological context under the influence of Jacques Lacan.[5] Lacan used scotomization to represent the ego's relationship to the unconscious – speaking of "everything that the ego, neglects, scotomizes, misconstrues in...reality"[6] – as well as to challenge Sartre's concept of the gaze.[7] Most significantly of all, however, he developed it into his influential update of Pinchon's concept of foreclosure, thus endowing that idea with a conflation of visual and verbal elements.[8]


視而不見,


視而宣稱不見,

Édouard Pichon (1890-1940)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89douard_Pichon

My journey starts in 1928 with the collaboration between Edouard Pichon, a founding member of the Société Parisienne de Psychanalyse, formerly a pediatrician turned psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, and his uncle Jacques Damourette, a gifted linguist and philogist. Their collaboration was described in surrealist terms 'beautiful as the encounter of an umbrella and a sewing machine on a dissection table.' Together they brought out a seven volume grammar, an erudite complicated text entitled "Des Mots à la Pensée" (From Words to Thinking). In contrast to other logicians who derived the rules of grammar from modes of thinking, Pichon and Damourette proceeded in the opposite direction. They are clearly the early pioneers of structural linguistics and, of course, precursors of Lacan. In addition Pichon, who incidentally was the son-in-law of Janet, wrote a number of texts relevant to our topic. The first is entitled Grammar as a Mode of Exploration of the Unconscious(1925). The second article on which I would like to spend some time is entitled "On the Psychological Significance of Negation in French". (p. 502)

Through his mixture of linguistic and psychoanalytic thinking, Pichon was a powerful influence on Jacques Lacan (as well as a practical mentor).[5] In Écrits, Lacan paid tribute to "a divination that I can attribute only to his practise of semantics...that guided him in people's dark places".[6]

Among the psychoanalytic concepts introduced by what Élisabeth Roudinesco called Pichon's "fatalist genius",[7] were those of oblatory, scotomization, and foreclosure.

As a sequel to his work on negation and the psychosis Pichon adopted the term foreclosure. The same term will be appropriated by Lacan though without giving credit to its originator. (p. 504)

The next development in the story of the negative, is the appearance in France of Alexandre Kojève who reintroduced Hegel's phenomenology in a course in l'Ecôle Pratique des Hautes Études. (p. 504)

For Hegel, negation is rooted in the philosophical system of dialectic, in which dramatically opposed points of view are advanced—something is/something is not. The original contradiction is resolved via a synthesis. Hegel believed that thinking always proceeded according to this pattern; that is the laying down of a thesis is at once negated by its antithesis, to be resolved by a synthesis which leads, in turn, to a new antithesis and so on. Hegel believed that what drove thinking was the power of the negative and that any developmental process has two inseparable aspects —the positive aspects of growth—the emergence of something new and the negative aspect of rejection or the discarding of something old. Thinking, as Hegal sees it, is dialectical, in that it carries negation within itself. (p. 505)

The interest in negation spilled over into structuralism, deconstructionism and surrealism. (p. 505)


Negation and its Vicissitudes in the History of Psychoanalysis —Its Particular Impact on French Psychoanalysis (Francis Baudry, 1989) (negativity vs vitality)

His key statement on negation, most extensively developed in the paper by that name (1925), touches on such key issues as the problem of language, judgement, reality testing, object relations and psychosis. In that paper Freud shows how affirmation in one system—the unconscious—is allowed to reach consciousness and circumvent the censorship by adopting through language a negative form. This paper was not available in French until 1934 in a translation by Hoesri in La Revue Française de Psychoanalyse. The interest in the negative emerges again in the last phases of Freud's life in the fetichism paper, the paper on splitting and in parts of the paper on constructions in analysis. (p. 502)

空無 (SP 2023) (自體的心理學)(明心篇)

第二世初,我曾說過,多撿一點垃圾,少製造一點垃圾,回想起來,當時,我就有空無之心,但是我不知道,為什麼當時我這麼說,就像我不知道,為什麼十年前我說,救贖是不可能的,除非內化了某種超越的結構,

昨晚讀了一點,A Walk in the Park: The Life and Times of a People's Institution (Travis Elborough, 2016

Travis 說,公園和童年,作為存在,都是「被創造出來的」,

意思是說,你我眼前,所見一切,都是被創造出來的,

空無就是回到,被創造出來之前,

你要理解,所有被創造出來的物 (具體的和抽象的),都「佔據」空間 (具體的和抽象的),都質疑空無(Why is there something, rather than nothing?) ,

Yes, why? And why not?,

你要理解,這個 why not,就是佔據的源起,結果就是垃圾,就是廢墟,

Now,有趣的是,被創造出來之前,只能是一個乾淨明亮的地方,

所以,問題出在,既然空無,何來乾淨,何來明亮,

什麼是乾淨,什麼是明亮,

以上,是對福德身心診所的思考,

意思是說,那個地方,就是空無,

意思是說,這件事情,我已預見,







Herbert R. Lottman (Interviewed by Professor Gerald Earl, 2017-4-4)

https://web.archive.org/web/20170404215649/http://ns.gingkopress.net/12-int/herbert-lottman-1.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Lottman

An influential biographer, he published 17 biographies, 15 of which were related to French culture, commerce, or politics; including works on Albert Camus, Colette, Gustave Flaubert, Henri Philippe Pétain, Jules Verne, and the Rothschild banking family of France. He wrote that, just before dying, Albert Camus was pledged to marry. Camus's estate tried to block his book, partly because of this controversial statement.[2][3

Saturday, November 18, 2023

When Digestive Symptoms Signal Parkinson's Disease

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/997576?ecd=mkm_ret_231118_mscpmrk_neuro_parkinsons_etid6069399&uac=304420PJ&impID=6069399

The enteric nervous system (ENS), which is regarded as our second brain, is the part of the autonomic nervous system that controls the digestive tract. Housed along the entire length of the digestive tract, it is made up of more than 100 million neurons. It plays a central role in controlling the regulation of gastrointestinal motility, absorption of nutrients, and control of the intestinal barrier that protects the body from external pathogens.

Braak's hypothesis suggests that the digestive tract could be the starting point for Parkinson's disease. The fact that nearly all patients with Parkinson's disease experience digestive problems and have neuropathological lesions in intrinsic and extrinsic innervation of the gastrointestinal tract suggests that Parkinson's disease also has a gastrointestinal component.

Gezi Park protests (2013-5-28)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gezi_Park_protests

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taksim_Gezi_Park